Cover not available
Part of
Language and Violence: Pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Daniel N. Silva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 279] 2017
► pp. 107–124

Chapter 4
The circulation of violence in discourse

This paper examines two hypotheses concerning the relationship between language and violence. (1) Language does not merely represent violence, but enacts its own type of violence. (2) The use of violent language participates in the demarcation of political and subjective viability in the public sphere. I argue that these hypotheses are true to the extent that discourse circulates. I elaborate on two models of discourse circulation: iterability, a concept that Jacques Derrida proposed and that Judith Butler borrows in her understanding of the performativity of hate speech, and communicability, an anthropological concept devised by Charles Briggs to envision the complex infectious character of modern discourses. This paper also looks at the communicability of violent discourse in Brazilian contemporary political life.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Violent language and iterability
  • 3.Violent language and communicability
  • 4.Using language to wound
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.279.05sil
References (31)
References
Agha, Asif. 2011. “Meet mediatization.” Language and Communication 31:163–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 127–86. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs. 2003. Voices of Modernity. Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles. 2005. “Communicability, Racial Discourse, and Disease.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 269–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. “Anthropology, Interviewing, and Communicability in Contemporary Social Life.” Current Anthropology 48 (4): 551–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. “Mediating infanticide: Theorizing relations between narrative and violence.” Cultural Anthropology 22 (3): 315–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “On Virtual Epidemics and the Mediatization of Public Health.” Language and Communication 31:217–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa. 2000. City of Walls. Crime, segregation and citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1977. “Signature Event Context.” Glyph 1: 172–197.Google Scholar
Feldman, Allen. 2000. Formations of Violence. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana. 1980. Le Scandale du corps parlant. Don Juan avec Austin ou la seduction en deux langues [The Scandal of the Speaking Body. Don Juan and Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1952. “On Sense and Reference.” In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. by Peter Geach and Max Black, 56–78. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gamboggi, Ana Laura. 2010. Lo que no se puede llevar en la maleta: Mudanza, memoria y museo en el nordeste brasileño [What Could Not Be Taken in the Suitcase: Change, Memory, and Museum in the Brazilian Northeast]. México, DF: Universidad Antónoma Metropolitana.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1959 [1690]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Malkki, Liisa. 1995. Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology Among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil. 2000. “On Searle (on Austin) on Language.” Language and Communication 20: 347–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1983 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. Transl. Roy Harris. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. “Reiterating the Differences: a Reply to Derrida.” Glyph 1: 198–208.Google Scholar
Silva, Daniel. 2012. Pragmática da violência: O Nordeste na mídia brasileira [Pragmatics of Violence: The Northeast of Brazil in the Media]. Rio de Janeiro: 7 Letras/Faperj.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology.” In The Elements, a Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Paul Clyne, William Hanks, and Carol Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.
2023. Representation of gender violence in appeal proceedings in Spain. Revista de Llengua i Dret :79 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Silva, Daniel do Nascimento e
2022. No movimento do caleidoscópio: Escalas sociolinguísticas e o ajuste de foco na pesquisa aplicada em linguagem. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 38:4 DOI logo
French, Brigittine M.
2020. Maledictive Language: Arguments and Conflict. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.