Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on grammar, interaction and culture
Edited by Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Yoshiko Matsumoto and Junko Mori
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 285] 2018
► pp. 17–48

Chapter 1
Reason-coding in Japanese

A Multiple Grammar perspective

 | University of California, Los Angeles
 | University of California, Los Angeles
This chapter examines how reasons are expressed in Japanese discourse, employing the Multiple Grammar (MG) Model proposed by Iwasaki (2015) as a theoretical foundation. It shows how the model can explain different ways in which reasons are expressed in conversation and newspaper editorials. This research is different from most previous works in that it starts with the function of reason coding rather than forms such as kara and node. In conversations, reasons are coded flexibly by employing mechanisms suited for on-line production while in editorials they are expressed using complex structures such as embedding with complement and relative clauses, made possible because there is almost no time constraint.
Keywords: reason-coding, Multiple Grammar Model, spoken grammar, written grammar, Japanese, pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Multiple Grammar model
  • 3.Grammatical resources for reason-coding
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Grammatical resources for reason-coding in conversation and editorials
    • 5.1Conversation
      • 5.1.1 Kara
      • 5.1.2 Shi
      • 5.1.3 Tame and node/nde
      • 5.1.4 Dakara
    • 5.2Editorials
      • 5.2.1 Kara
      • 5.2.2 Shi
      • 5.2.3 Tame and node
      • 5.2.4 Dakara
      • 5.2.5 Relative clause
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.285.01kaw
References (60)
References
Bender, Emily, and Andreas Kathol. 2001. “Constructional Effects of Just Because… Doesn’t Mean .” Berkeley Linguistic Society 27: 13–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. “A Typology of English Text.” Linguistics 27: 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition.” Language 82 (4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Paul Hopper. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canavan, Alexandra, and George Zipperlen. 1996. CALLHOME Japanese Speech LDC96S37. DVD. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1982. “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature.” In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 34–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Deborah Tannen. 1987. “The Relation between Written and Spoken Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia. 1982. “Written and Spoken Style in Japanese Narratives.” In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 55–75. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2014. “Recycling Utterances: A Speaker’s Guide to Sentence Processing.” Cognitive Linguistics 25 (4): 617–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger, and Michael Tomasello. 2001. “The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 97–141 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. “Competing motivations.” In Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 343–365. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. “Discourse Basis of Ergativity.” Language 63 (4): 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Junko Mori. “Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar.” Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 4.1 (1994): 31–61.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Noriko, and Tsuyoshi Ono. 2000. “The Occurrence and Non-Occurrence of the Japanese Direct Object Marker o in Conversation.” Studies in Language 24 (1):1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. The Language of Science: Collected Works of M. A. J. Halliday Vol5, ed. by Jonathan J. Webster. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2008. “Utterance-final Conjunctive Particles and Implicature in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 18 (3): 425–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1987. “Emergent Grammar.” In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis and H. Filip: 139–155.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Emergent Grammar and the A Priori Grammar.” In Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 117–134. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Emergent Grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 2001. “Grammatical constructions and their discourse origins: prototype or family resemblance.” In Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition, ed. by Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier, and René Dirven, 109–29. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 2004. “The Openness of Grammatical Constructions.” InProceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Vol. 40, 153–175. Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Horiike, Naoaki. 1999. “‘Shi’ o mochiita gen’in/riyuu hyoogen ni tsuite [On the use of shi to indicate reason/cause].” Tsukuba Nihongo Kenkyuu 4: 71–90Google Scholar
Imao, Yukiko. 1991. “Kara, node, tame.” Nihongogaku 10 (12): 78–99.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “A Multiple-Grammar Model of Speaker’s Linguistic Knowledge.” Cognitive Linguistics 26. 161–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi, and Tsuyoshi Ono. 2002. “‘Sentence’ in Spontaneous Spoken Japanese Discourse.” In Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Joan Bybee, and Michael Noonan, 175–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaneyasu, Michiko, and Iwasaki Shoichi. 2017a. Indexing ‘Entrustment’: An Analysis of the Japanese Formulaic Construction [N da yo N]. Discourse Studies. 1–20.Google Scholar
. 2017b. “Tajuu-bunpoo: Koto no bunseki o tooshite [Multiple grammars: An analysis of koto ].” In Hanashi kotoba e no apuroochi [An approach to spoken language] ed. by Ryoko Suzuki, Kaori Hata and Daisuke Yokomori. Tokyo: Hituji Syobo.Google Scholar
Karatsu, Mariko. 1995. “A Functional Analysis of DEWA, DAKARA and SHIKASHI in Conversation.” Japanese Discourse 1: 107–130.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Sachie. 1994. Setsuzokujoshi shi no bunronteki koosatsu [A discourse study of the connective particle shi ]. In Tookyoo Gaikokugo Daigaku Ryuugakusee Nihongo Kyooiku Sentaa Ronshuu 20. 15–27.Google Scholar
Kroll, Barbara. 1977. Combining Ideas in Written and Spoken English. In Discourse Across Time and Space: Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5, ed. by Elinor O. Keenan & Tina. L. Bennett, 69–108. Los Angeles, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Kurumada, Chigusa, and Shoichi Iwasaki. 2011. “Negotiating Desirability: The Acquisition of the Uses of Ii ‘Good’ in Mother-Child Interactions in Japanese.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 19, ed. by Ho-ming Sohn, Haruko Minegishi Cook, William O’Grady, Leon Serafim, and Sang Yee Cheon, 511–525. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol.1 Theoretical Preliminaries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. “A Dynamic Usage-based Model.” In Usage-Based Models of Language, ed. by Michael Barlow and Suzzanne Kemmer, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2004. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Makino, Seiichi, and Michio Tsutsui. 1986. A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1993. Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGloin, Naomi, and Yumiko Konishi. 2010. “From Connective Particle to Sentence-final Particle: A Usage-based Analysis of shi ‘and’ in Japanese.” Language Sciences 32: 563–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim, and Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru, and Mari Nakamura. 1991. “The Logic of Kara and Node in Japanese.” In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language, ed. by Carol Georgopoulos, and Roberta Ishihara, 435–448. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagano, Masaru. 1970. Dentatsuron ni motozuku Nihongo bumpoo no kenkyuu. Tokyo: Tokyodo.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1979. “Planned and Unplanned Discourse.” In Discourse and Syntax (Syntax and Semantics, Vol 12), ed. by Talmy Givon, 51–79. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1995. “Remarks on Suspended Clauses: A Contribution to Japanese Phraseology.” In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, and Sandra A. Thompson, 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi and Shoichi Iwasaki. 2002. “Toward an Understanding ‘Sentence’ in Spoken Japanese Discourse: Clause Combining and On-line Mechanisms.” In Culture, Interaction, and Language, ed. by Kuniyoshi Kataoka, and Sachiko Ide, 103–131. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1994. “Unattached NPs in English Conversation.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 20, 402–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yasuhiro Shirai. 2007. “The Consequences of Variation in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses: An Analysis of Longitudinal Production Data from Five Japanese Children.” In Diversity in Language Perspectives and Implications, ed. by Yoshiko Matsumoto, David Oshima, Robison Orrin, and Petter Sells, 243–270. Stanford: CSLIGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, and Frances H. Syder. 1983a. “Natural Selection in Syntax: Notes on Adaptive Variation and Change in Vernacular and Literary Grammar.” Journal of Pragmatics 7 (5): 551–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983b. “Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency.” In Language and communication, ed. by Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt. 191–225. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Purcell-Gates, Victoria. 2001. “Emergent Literacy Is Emerging Knowledge of Written, Not Oral Language.” In The Role of Family Literacy Environments in Promoting Young Children’s Emerging Literacy Skills, ed. by Pia Rebello Britto, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, 7–22. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Sulzby, Elizabeth. 1985. “Children’s Emergent Abilities to Read Favorite Storybooks: A Developmental Study.” Reading Research Quarterly 20: 458–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (ed.). 1982. Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Paul J. Hopper. 2001. “Transitivity, Clause Structure, and Argument Structure: Evidence from Conversation.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan L. Bybee, and Paul J. Hopper, 27–59. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Mie. 2012. “Five-level Classification of Clause Linkage in Japanese.” Studies in Language 36 (2): 382–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison, and George W. Grace. 2007. “The Consequences of Talking to Strangers: Evolutionary Corollaries of Socio-cultural Influences on Linguistic Form.” Lingua 117: 543–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar