Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on grammar, interaction and culture
Edited by Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Yoshiko Matsumoto and Junko Mori
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 285] 2018
► pp. 75–98

Chapter 3
The form and meaning of the dangling mitaina construction in a network of constructions

| Stanford University
In recent years the use in Japanese of the prenominal form mitaina of the evidential expression, mitaida ‘(it) look(s) like,’ has been observed at the utterance final position with no noun following it. The pragmatic function of this apparently innovative construction has been described in terms of the speakers’ distancing from a vivid and engaged description in the preceding clause. This chapter suggests as an alternative analysis of the construction, based on spoken and written data, that mitaina signals the speaker’s stance, conveying his/her impressionistic and vivid description of the situation described in the preceding component. The pairing of the form and meaning makes this construction a full-fledged grammatical construction in terms of Construction Grammar, rather than an idiosyncratic phenomenon.
Keywords: Construction Grammar, constructionalization, pragmatics, innovative, mitaina , stance, complementizer, quotative, evidential, Japanese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The structure of the dangling mitaina construction
  • 3. The meaning and pragmatics of the dangling mitaina construction
    • 3.1Effect of missing noun
    • 3.2Quotation of the original speaker’s speech/thought or the speaker’s stance?
  • 4.Summary and implications of the DMC in a network of constructions
    • 4.1 Summary
    • 4.2Constructional implications of the DMC
  • 5.Conclusion
  • List of abbreviations
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.285.03mat
References (36)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. ed. by Michael Holquist, (translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, John R. Rickford, Ellizabeth C. Traugott, Thomas Wasow, and Arnold D. Zwicky. 2010. “The Sociolinguistics of a Short-Lived Innovation: Tracing the Development of Quotative All Across Spoken and Internet Newsgroup Data.” Language Variation and Change 22(2): 191–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1982. “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature.” In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Evans, Nocholas. 2007. “Insubordination and Its Uses.” In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. by Irena Nikolaeva, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam. 2009. “Representing Contextual Factors in Language Change: Between Frames and Constructions.” In Contexts and Constructions, ed. by Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald, 63–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam and Jan-Ola Östman. 2005. “Construction Grammar and Spoken Language: The Case of Pragmatic Particles.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1752–1778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Seiko. 2006. “Quoted Thought and Speech Using the Mitai-na (‘be like’) Noun-Modifying Construction.” In Emotive Communication in Japanese, ed. by Satoko Suzuki. 53–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 1997. “An Exploration of Sentence-Final Uses of the Quotative Particle in Japanese Spoken Discourse.” In Japanese/ Korean Linguistics Vol. 6, ed. by Ho-min Sohn and John Haig, 565–581. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Horie, Kaoru. 2014. “Shusetsu to juuzokusetsu no soogokinoo kakuchoo-genshoo to tsuugengoteki hitaishoosee: Nihongo to tagengo no hikaku o tsuujite. [Mutual functional expansion between the main clause and the subordinate clause and the diachronic asymmetry: The comparison between Japanese and other languages].” In Nihongo fukubun-koobun no kenkyuu [Form and meaning in Japanese complex sentence constructions], ed. by Takashi Masuoka, Motoo Oshima, Osamu Hashimoto, Kaoru Horie, Naoko Maeda, and Takehiko Maruyama, 673–974. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Kato, Yoko. 2010. Hanashi-kotoba ni okeru inyoo-hyoogen [Quotative expressions in spoken language]. Tokyo: Kurosio Syuppan.Google Scholar
Kim, Joungmin. 2014. “Kankokugo no inyoo-shuushokusetsu no shusetsu-ka: Nihongo tono taihi o tsuujite. [Main clause phenomena of quotatitve clauses in Korean: Contrast with Japanese].” In Nihongo fukubun-koobun no kenkyuu [Form and meaning in Japanese complex sentence constructions], ed. by Takashi Masuoka, Motoo Oshima, Osamu Hashimoto, Kaoru horie, Naoko Maeda, and Takehiko Maruyama, 695–717. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. Noun-modifying Constructions in Japanese: A Frame Semantic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “The Complementizer Toyuu in Japanese.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 7, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, Hajime Hoji, Shoichi Iwasaki, Sung-Ock Sohn, and Susan Strauss, 243–255. 
Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Painful to Playful: Quotidian Frames in the Conversational Discourse of Older Japanese Women.” Language in Society 40 (05): 591–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1986. “The Particle-o and Content-oriented Indirect Speech in Japanese Written Discourse.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 179–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Another Conversation: Expressivity of Mitaina and Inserted Speech in Japanese Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 37(6): 837–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGloin, Naomi. H. 2014. “Subordination and Information Status.” In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the Understanding of Human Language, ed. by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono, 13–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1979. “Planned and Unplanned Discourse.” In Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givon, 51–80. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1995. “Remarks on Suspended Clauses: A Contribution to Japanese Phraseology.” In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani and Sandra A. Thompson, 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1997. Framing Effects in Japanese Non-final Clauses: Toward an Optimal Grammar-Pragmatics Interface” Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure: 471–480.
Ohso, Mieko. 2008. “Nichijookaiwa ni okeru ‘mitaida’ to ‘yooda’: Meidai kaiwa koopasu ni motozuku koosatsu [ Mitaida and yooda in everyday conversation: Observations from the meidai conversation corpus.]” The Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the Japanese Language Education Association, Vol. 20.
Okamoto, Shigeko, and Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2008. “Quotative tte in Japanese.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. by Ritva Laury, 205–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirakawa, Hiroyuki. 1995. “Riyuu o arawasanai kara [ Kara that does not express reason]” In Fukubun no kenkyuu [Stuides in complex sentences], ed. by Yoshio Nitta. 189–210. Tokyo: Kurosio Syuppan.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko. 2007. “(Inter)subjectification in the Quotative tte in Japanese Conversation: Local Change, Utterance-ness and Verb-ness.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 207–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko. 1995. “A Study of the Sentence-final Mitai na .” Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 29 (2): 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “ De Dicto Complementation in Japanese.” In Complementation: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives, ed. by Kaoru Horie, 31–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1982. “Oral and Literate Strategies in Spoken and Written Narratives.” Language 58: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 11–32. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teramura, Hideo. 1977. “Rentai-shuushoku no shintakusu to imi 3 [Syntax and semantics of noun modification 3].” Nihongo Nihon-bunka 6 [The Japanese language and culture 6]. Osaka, Japan: Osaka Gaikokugo Daigaku Kenkyuusee Bekka. 1–35. Reprinted in Teramura Hideo ronbun-shuu 1: Nihongo bunpoo hen [Collected works of Hideo Teramura 1: Grammar of the Japanese language]. 1992. 261–296. Tokyo: Kurosio Syuppan.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Muudo no keeshiki to hitee.” In Eego to Nihongo to [English and Japanese]. Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan.Google Scholar
. 1984. Nihongo no shintakusu to imi II [Syntax and semantics of Japanese II]. Tokyo: Kurosio Syuppan.Google Scholar
Traugott, Ellizabeth C., and Richard B Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Ellizabeth C., and Greame Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Contentful Constructionalization.” Journal of Historical Linguistics 4 (2): 256–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Arita, Yuki
2021. Temporal realization of multimodally designed enactment in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Asian Languages and Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Arita, Yuki
2022. Japanese hypothetical enactment as a response to third-party complaint. Text & Talk 42:6 ► pp. 801 ff. DOI logo
Arita, Yuki
2023. Japanese turn-finaltteyuuas a formulation device. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:2 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.