Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on grammar, interaction and culture
Edited by Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Yoshiko Matsumoto and Junko Mori
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 285] 2018
► pp. 149–172

Chapter 6
Negotiating entitlement in Japanese

The case of requesting forms

 | University of Wisconsin-Madison
This study investigates how speakers construct their entitlement (the speaker’s right and/or capacity to perform certain actions) in requests observed in Japanese workplace discourse. It shows that the -te kudasai format frequently appears in requests originally issued by an outside entity and whose content had already been agreed upon. Other forms of request appear when issuers framed their request as their own, and these requests tend to include mitigation elements (e.g., qualification of requested actions and apologies). The study concludes that the speaker’s strong or weak entitlement to issue a request is related to the discourse participants’ understanding of institutional procedures (knowledge of duties, channels of agreement) and institutional identity (their connection to the original issuer of requests).
Keywords: requests, directives, Japanese, workplace discourse, politeness, face-work, entitlement, pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Past studies on request and politeness
    • 2.1Requests and politeness
    • 2.2Politeness and face-work
    • 2.3Request, identity and entitlement in workplace discourse
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1General tendencies
    • 4.2 Different formats and degrees of entitlement
      • 4.2.1Display of strong and weak entitlement
      • 4.2.2 Confirmatory (already-agreed-upon) requests
      • 4.2.3Whose request is it?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.285.06gey
References (34)
References
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe (eds). 1998. Identities in Talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Asmuß, Birte. 2007. “What Do People Expect from Public Services? Requests in Public Service Encounters.” Journal of Language and Communication Studies 38: 65–83.Google Scholar
Asmuß, Birte, and Sae Oshima. 2012. “Negotiation of Entitlement in Proposal Sequences.” Discourse Studies 14 (1): 68–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Dale H. Schunk. 1980. “Polite Responses to Polite Requests.” Cognition 8: 111–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2011. “Are Honorifics Polite? Uses of Referent Honorifics in a Japanese Committee Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3655–3642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Cynthia. D. 2011. “Formal Forms or Verbal Strategies? Politeness Theory and Japanese Business Etiquette Training.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3643–3654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francik, Ellen P., and Herbert H Clark. 1985. “How to Make Requests that Overcome Obstacles to Compliance.” Journal of Memory and Language 24: 560–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagne, Nana Okura. 2010. “Reexamining the Notion of Negative Face in the Japanese Sociolinguistic Politeness of Request.” Language and Communication 30: 123–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geyer, Naomi. 2008. Discourse and Politeness: Ambivalent Face in Japanese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. “Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences.” Text and Talk 26: 515–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Trine. 2006. “‘Will You or Can’t You?’: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1081–1104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Mutsuko Endo. 2011. “Student Honorifics Usage in Conversations with Professors.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3689–3706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makino, Seiichi, and Michio Tsutsui. 1986. A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel. E. 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niyekawa, Agnes. 1991. Minimum Essential Politeness: A Guide to the Japanese Honorific Language. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Ohashi, Jun. 2003. “Japanese Culture Specific Face and Politeness Orientation: A Pragmatic Investigation of Yoroshiku Onegaishimasu .” Multilingua 22: 257–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okada, Misao. 2008. “When the Coach is a Woman: The Situated Meaning of So-Called Masculine Directives in a Japanese Boxing Gym” In Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives, ed. by Junko Mori, and Amy Snyder Ohta, 160–187. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko. 2011. “The Use and Interpretation of Addressee Honorifics and Plain Forms in Japanese: Diversity, Multiplicity, and Ambiguity.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3673–3688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rinnert, Carol, and Hiroe Kobayashi. 1999. “Requestive Hints in Japanese and English.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1173–1201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, Junko. 2011. “Managing Confrontational Situations: Japanese Male Superiors’ Interactional Styles in Directive Discourse in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1689–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibamoto-Smith, Janet. S. 2011. “Honorifics, ‘Politeness,’ and Power in Japanese Political Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3707–3719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Janet S. 1992. “Women in Charge: Politeness and Directives in the Speech of Japanese Women.” Language in Society 21(1), 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunaoshi, Yukako. 1994. “Mild Directives Work Effectively: Japanese Women in Command.” Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 679–690.Google Scholar
Takano, Shoji. 2005. “Re-examining Linguistic Power: Strategic Use of Directives by Professional Japanese Women in Position of Authority and Leadership.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 633–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Diegoli, Eugenia
2022. “Sorry for your consideration”: The (in)adequacy of English speech act labels in describing ‘apologies’ and ‘thanks’ in Japanese. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:5 ► pp. 621 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.