Cover not available
Part of
Legal Pragmatics
Edited by Dennis Kurzon and Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 288] 2018
► pp. 231–256

Chapter 11
On the balance between invariance and context-dependence

Legal concepts and their environments

| University of Turku

The central question asked in this chapter is how to reconcile the well-known conundrum of legal language being at the same time decontextualized yet influenced by context. This paradox is addressed here by reviewing the meaning of currently topical legal notions in environments where there are two or more valid jurisdictions – the national and the supranational or transnational – simultaneously present. Textualism and contextualism need not be conflicting paradigms in finding a solution between competing meanings. Rather, a balance could be struck through linguistic explanation. The paradox of competing interpretations is discussed here from the point of view of both law-givers and law-takers.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Legal pragmatics and legal pragmatism
  • 3. Context
  • 4. Invariance
  • 5. Disconcerting notions
    • 5.1Multilingual context I – supranational v national
      • 5.1.1Case 1 – catch as catch can
      • 5.1.2Case 2 – Family is best but what is a family?
    • 5.2Multilingual context II – Transnational
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • List of official documents
  • List of cases
Published online: 26 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.288.11sal
References
Auer, Peter
, and Aldo Di Luzio (eds) 1992 The Contextualisation of Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Context and Contextualisation.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. by Jeff Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman, 86–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, George
1972 Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt
1993 Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann
1991 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1983 “Simplification v. Easification – The Case of Legal Texts”. Applied Linguistics Vol. 4, No. 1. 42–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, John H.
2014 “The Contextual Component within a Dynamic Implementation of the FDG Model: Structure and Interaction.” Pragmatics 24:2. 229–248.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, Alice Johnson, and David Wright
2016 An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo and Jerzy Wróblewski
1991 “The Rational Law-Maker and the Pragmatics of Legal Interpretation”. Journal of Pragmatics. Volume 15, No. 5, May 1991 421–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endicott, Timothy A. O.
2015 “Legal Interpretation”. In Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. ed. by A. Marmor, 109–123. London: Routledge. Available at: [URL]
Engberg, Jan
2004 “Statutory Texts as Instances of Language(s): Consequences and Limitations on Interpretation.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law Vol. 29, No. 3. 1135–1166.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard
2005 “Wealth of Terms – Scarcity of Justice? Term Formation in Statutory Definitions.” In Contemporary Issues of the Semiotics of Law. Cultural and Symbolic Analyses of Law in Global Context, ed. by Anne Wagner, Tracey Summerfield, Farid Benevides Vanegas. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Frawley, William, and Roberta Golinkoff
1995 Linguistic Explanation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garre, Marianne
1999 Human Rights in Translation. Legal Concepts in Different Languages. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, John P.
2003 Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Glennon, Michael J.
2010 The Fog of Law: Pragmatism, Security and International Law, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1972 Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Alessandro Duranti
1992 “Rethinking Context: An Introduction.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas C.
1989/2014 “Holmes and Legal Pragmatism.” Reprinted In Formalism and Pragmatism in American Law. Brill Online Books. Available at: [URL] (Accessed June 30, 2016). DOI logo
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3. Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John
1992 “Contextualization Revisited.” In The Contextualisation of Language, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo Di Luzio, 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.
1961 The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hviid Jacobsen, Michael and Søren Kristiansen
2015 The Social Thought of Erving Goffman. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. DOI logo
Johnson-Laird, Philip
1983 Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Koenigswarter, Julia
2013 “A Comparative Study of Categorization and Avoidance Phenomena of Semantic Universes in Matters of Abortion in France and Ireland.” Unpublished seminar paper, Introduction to Legal Linguistics Workshop, University of Turku, Faculty of Law, spring term 2013.
Kolehmainen, Antti
2014 “Syntynyt tai siitetty – Keinohedelmöitetyn lapsen oikeudesta perintöön.” [Born or conceived – The inheritance rights of an artificially inseminated child] In Oikeustiede – Jurisprudentia XLVII:2014, 61–112. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola
2004 A Life of H.L.A. Hart. The Nightmare and the Noble Dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lainé, Marie
2013 “The Notion of Parents: A Concept of Family Law Subject to Societal Changes.” Unpublished seminar paper, Introduction to Legal Linguistics Workshop, University of Turku, Faculty of Law, spring term 2013.
Lakoff, Robin T.
1993 “Lewis Carroll: Subversive Pragmaticist.” A plenary address at the 4th International Pragmatics Association Conference, Kobe, Japan, July 25–30, 1993. Published In Pragmatics Vol. 3, No. 4. December 1993.
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1975 Semantics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lind, Craig, and Tom Hewitt
2009 “Law and the Complexities of Parenting: Parental Status and Parental Function.” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 31:4, 391–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil
1981 H.L.A. Hart: Jurist Profiles in Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miettinen, Timo
2013 The Idea of Europe in Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Study in Generativity and Historicity. Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki. No. 36. Helsinki. Available at: [URL] (Accessed June 30, 2016).
Morawetz, Thomas
1990 “Epistemology of Judging: Wittgenstein and Deliberative Practices”, Faculty Articles and Papers, 203. 35–59. [URL] (Accessed September 25, 2017)
Noortmann, Math and Cedric Ryngaert
(eds) 2013 Non-State Actor Dynamics in International Law – From Law-takers to Law-makers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1979 Developmental Pragmatics. Vancouver: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1935 Collected papers. Vol. 5. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.
1990 “What Has Pragmatism to Offer Law?” Southern California Law Review Vol. 63. 1653–1670.Google Scholar
1995 Overcoming Law. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert
1949 The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salmi-Tolonen, Tarja
2008 Language and the Functions of Law: A Legal Linguistic Study. Turku: Painosalama.Google Scholar
2014 “Interpersonality and Fundamental Rights.” In Interpersonality in Legal Genres, ed. by Ruth Breeze, Maurizio Gotti, and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 63–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017 “Matkaava filosofia” (Travelling philosophy; A review of J.L. Austin’s How to Do Things with Words translation into Finnish), Oikeus 1/2017 148–157.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy Of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkälä, Toni
2014 “But in this Twilight our Choices Seal our Fate: The Interplay of Autonomy and Dignity in Defining Interaction of Legal Response to the Beginning of Human Life.” In Oikeustiede – Jurisprudentia XLVII:2014, 253–333. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing.Google Scholar
Siltala, Raimo
2000 A Theory of Precedent. From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence
2001 “Ordinary Meaning and Legal Interpretation.” In Proceedings from the Conference of Law and Language – Prospect and Retrospect, ed. by Tarja Salmi-Tolonen, Richard Foley, and Iris Tukiainen. CD-ROM, University of Lapland.Google Scholar
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 30, 2016).
Sullivan, Ruth
2001 “Some Implications of Plain Language Drafting”, 22:3 Statute Law Review, 145–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
1995 Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter
1999 Legal Language, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001 “A Message in a Bottle: Text, Autonomy, and Statutory Interpretation”. Tulane Law Review. Vol. 76: 431. Available at SSRN: [URL] (Accessed September 25, 2017)
Tolonen, Hannu
1997 ”Mitä oikeus on?” (What is Law?) Oikeus 2/1997, 109–123.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo
1997 Law, Power and Critique, In Tuori, Kaarlo, Zenon Bankowski, Jyrki Uusitalo (eds) Law and Power: Critical and Socio-Legal Essays. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications. 7–29.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

List of official documents

Code civil des français
Available at: [URL] (Accessed on 30 June, 2016).
The Constitution of Ireland
1999 Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 19, 2016).
Constitution Review Group
1996 Report of the Constitution Review Group. Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 19, 2016).
Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000
Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 19, 2016).
European Convention on Human Rights
1950 Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 23, 2016).
Execution Act
15.6.2007/705
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
1966 Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 23, 2016).
Regulation No 1/58 EEC Council: Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community
Available at: [URL]
Regulation No 802/68 of the Council of 27 June 1968 on the common definition of the concept of the origin of goods
Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 19, 2016).

List of cases

Bestuur der Sociale Verzkeringsbank v J.H. van der Vecht
(19–67 1996, ECR 345)Google Scholar
Case 100/84 Commission v the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Available at: [URL] (Accessed on June 19, 2016).
Cour de cassation, Assemblée plénière, Audience publique du vendredi 29 juin 2001, N° de pourvoi: 99–85973, Publié au bulletin Rejet
Available at: [URL] (Accessed June 19, 2016).
Defrenne v SA Belge de Navigation Aérienne (SABENA)
(43/75 1976, ECR 455)Google Scholar
Evans v United Kingdom
GC no. 6339/05§ ECHR 2007–3.Google Scholar
KKO
2001:100.Google Scholar
Régina v Pierre Boucherau
C 30–77 1977, ECR 1999.Google Scholar
Roche v Roche and ors
[2009] IESC 82 Supreme Court Record Number: 469/06 and 59/07.Google Scholar
VO v France GC no 53924/00
ECHR 2004–VIII.Google Scholar
Wood v Capita Insurance Services Limited
[2017] UKSC 24 [URL] comments at >[URL] (Accessed September 25, 2017)