Legal pragmatics - subject index proposal
A
- adversarial judicial systems
135, 158
- Alice Lisle
12, 65, 67, 68, 72, 76—79
B
- bijural and bilingual legal systems
15, 257
C
- Canadian legal system
14,
- context
2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 13, 17, 21—28
-
passim,
32, 34, 36, 38—40
-
passim,
43, 47, 53, 55, 61, 65, 69, 81, 82, 88, 89, 102, 108, 117, 118, 125, 128, 136, 137, 139, 140, 152, 158—160
-
passim,
167, 181, 184, 185, 187, 192—195
-
passim,
203, 204, 206, 209, 211, 222—224
-
passim,
231, 232, 234, 236, 240, 242, 252—254
-
passim,
264, 267, 270—276
- contextualism vs. textualism
14, 231, 232, 233, 256
- control
4, 13, 22, 42, 44, 133, 134, 136, 137, 140, 141
- Cooperative Principle
9, 66, 136, 140
- courtroom discourse
3, 4, 6, 11—13
-
passim,
30, 62, 66, 133, 134, 139, 140, 142
- Critical Discourse Analysis
13, 64, 133, 137, 139, 141
- Cromwell, Thomas
82, 83, 92
E
- Egyptian legal system
13, 157, 158
- European Union
15, 89, 94, 121, 128, 129, 258
- European Court of Justice
13, 119, 121, 122, 124, 125
F
- felicity conditions
2, 233
- forensic linguistics
15, 16, 115, 116, 155, 179, 226, 253, 254
G
- Golden Rule of Interpretation
82, 89, 90
I
- implicatures
5, 12, 65—79
-
passim,
82, 87, 94, 115, 122, 136, 157
- information
2—4
-
passim,
23, 47, 73, 81, 87, 93, 102, 104, 106, 109, 113, 115, 117, 119, 120, 128, 140, 141, 145—7
-
passim,
149, 160, 167, 168, 171, 173—176
-
passim,
178, 184, 186, 189, 208, 209, 211, 212, 216, 222, 231, 249
- institutional discourse
25, 43
- intellectual disability
204, 211, 216, 223—226
- interaction
35, 47, 62, 117, 119, 133, 135—138
-
passim,
140, 141, 143, 146, 147, 149, 152, 154, 157, 158, 178, 179, 182, 186, 187, 192—194
-
passim,
204, 206, 211, 213, 216, 224, 227, 232, 233, 236, 237, 246, 253, 255, 258
- interpretation legal and statutory
4, 14, 40, 88, 90, 115, 122, 125, 126, 129, 159, 219, 232—234
-
passim,
238, 240, 241, 243, 247, 249, 251—253
-
passim,
266, 267, 269, 271, 273, 275, 276
- pragmatic and linguistic
12, 13, 16, 80—83
-
passim,
85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 115, 117—122
-
passim,
124, 127, 128, 196, 198, 235—237
- interrogations
13, 135, 140, 153, 157—161
-
passim,
163, 165, 167—169
-
passim,
171, 173, 175, 177—179
- investigative interviews
159, 203, 205—207
-
passim,
209, 211, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221—225
- intertextuality
25, 28, 101, 105—108
J
- Japanese criminal investigations
14
K
- King Charles I
12, 65, 67, 68, 72, 80
- King Henry VIII
10, 12, 81—84
L
- lay person / participant
12, 101, 103, 105—108
-
passim,
110, 114, 135, 137
- legal knowledge
12, 76, 101, 106, 107, 114, 115
- legal language
2, 3, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 23, 62, 63, 94, 101—103
- legal presuppositions
5, 8, 82, 87, 88
- legal sub-language vs. plain language
10, 101—108
-
passim,
111, 114, 116, 120, 258
- linguistic vs. communicative meaning
12, 13, 81, 117, 119
M
- Miranda warning
4, 12, 65, 66, 80
- More, Sir Thomas
10, 12, 81, 82, 88—94
- Mubarak, Hosni
13, 160, 161, 164, 167, 172—177
N
- Negotiation Staircase
14, 181, 182, 184, 190, 192
- Nigerian courtroom discourse
13, 133—139
O
- Old Bailey
11, 41, 47, 62—64
P
- petition
21—23
-
passim,
25, 26, 28, 30—38
- police investigations
4, 11, 13, 14, 131
- power
4, 5, 10, 11—14
-
passim,
23, 24, 28, 66, 67, 69, 71, 73, 74, 79, 85, 86, 95, 97, 133, 135, 136—144
-
passim,
146, 147, 149, 152, 154, 155, 157—159
-
passim,
161, 167, 173, 176—179
-
passim,
186, 192, 198, 203, 206, 207, 222, 223, 225, 226, 239, 255, 265
R
- reasonable person
9, 106, 111—113
S
- Salem Witchcraft Trials (1692)
10, 11, 40
- SAFE (Substantive demands, Attunement, Face and Emotional distress)
14, 181, 182, 183—186
- silence (see also Miranda warning)
4, 10, 80, 93, 94, 148, 182, 185, 186, 194, 198, 203, 209, 211, 214—220
- speech act
2, 3, 7, 8, 21, 25, 93, 94, 129, 136
- Sugaya, Toshikazu
205, 225
T
- thought experiment
12, 107, 108, 111, 114, 115
U
- utterance meaning vs. speaker meaning
12, 66, 82, 87