Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish: Explorations across genres
Edited by Carolina Figueras Bates and Adrián Cabedo
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 290] 2018
► pp. 25–48

Chapter 2
On the dynamicity of evidential scales

Pragmatic indirectness in evidentiality as a rhetorical strategy in academic and political discourse

| University of Valencia. Val.Es.Co Research Group
| University of Valencia. Val.Es.Co Research Group
Based on examples from academic papers and parliamentary debates in Spain, the present paper studies a particular phenomenon within evidentiality, which is called ‘pragmatic indirectness’ in this work. This phenomenon involves examples in which evidentiality is expressed formally in a certain way (for instance, it is presented as reporting someone else’s words), but where the meaning conveys a different kind of evidentiality (for example, it is actually obtained through a process of reasoning). The existence of this phenomenon can be explained by the facts that
a.
Evidentials are organised according to scales: some evidentials are considered more preferable than are others, as the degrees of preference are changeable and determined contextually; and
b.
Speakers accommodate their discourse to these scales (more or less) strategically, depending on their intentions and goals, as well as on the expectations raised by the context; and they do so by
i.
Choosing the evidence best ranked in a particular context and, if not available,
ii.
By concealing the (less preferable) evidence they have available in the guise of evidentials located higher in the ranking.
Special attention will be paid to the role of discursive genres in the use and values of pragmatic indirectness in evidentiality.
Keywords: evidentiality, Spanish, genres, indirectness
Article outline
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1Aims and scope
    • 1.2 Some introductory examples
  • 2.Evidentiality and pragmatics
    • 2.1How is evidentiality categorised?
    • 2.2The pragmatic dimension of evidentiality
      • 2.2.1Evidentials and scales
  • 3.Evidentials in interaction: Dynamic scales and pragmatic indirectness
    • 3.1On the dynamicity of evidential scales in context. Communicative goals
    • 3.2Mismatches between form and meaning. ‘Pragmatic indirectness’ in evidentiality
    • 3.3 On pragmatic indirectness as a cancellation of compositional meaning. Foregrounding and backgrounding information
  • 4.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.290.02est
References (74)
References
Albelda, Marta. 2016a. “La expresión de la evidencialidad en la construcción se ve (que).” Spanish in Context 13 (2): 237–262.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albelda, Marta. 2016b. “Estableciendo límites entre la evidencialidad y la atenuación en español.” In La evidencialidad en español. Teoría y descripción, ed. by Ramón González, Dámaso Izquierdo, and Óscar Loureda, 75–102. Madrid: Iberoamericana/ Vervuert.Google Scholar
. (in press 1). “Evidentials as a Mark of Genre: a Study of Four Oral and Written Genres.” Pragmatics and Society.
. (in press 2). “¿Atenuación del compromiso del hablante?:el caso de los evidenciales por lo visto y se ve que .” Rilce.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2015. “On the Mitigating Function of Modality and Evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish Medical Research Papers.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1): 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avilés Martínez, José María, and Monjas Casares, Inés. 2005. “Estudio de incidencia de la intimi-dación y el maltrato entre iguales en la educación secundaria obligatoria mediante el cuestionario CIMEI (Avilés, 1999) –Cuestionario sobre Intimidación y Maltrato Entre Iguales–.” Anales de psicología 21(1): 27–4.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, Fernando. 2005. Evidencialidad. La codificación lingüística del punto de vista. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet Institutionen för Spanska, Portugisiska Och Latinamerikastudier.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 1998. El español coloquial. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. 2010. “El registro como centro de la variedad situacional. Esbozo de la propuesta del grupo Val.Es.Co. sobre las variedades diafásicas.” In Perspectivas dialógicas en estudios del lenguaje, ed. by Irene Fonte, and Lidia Rodríguez Alfano, 21–56. Monterrey: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Evidencialidad, significados pragmáticos y partículas discursivas en español. Sobre la intensificación tácticamente evidencial.” In La evidencialidad en español: teoría y descripción, ed. by Ramón González, Dámaso Izquierdo, and Óscar Loureda, 103–127. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio, and Marta Albelda. 2013. “Una propuesta teórica y metodológica para el análisis de la atenuación lingüística en español y portugués. La base de un proyecto en común (ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN).” Onomazein 28: 288–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2010. “Evidence for what?: Evidentiality and Scope.” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 63(4): 290–307.Google Scholar
. 2012. Epistemic Meaning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carretero, Marta. 2002. “The Influence of Genre and Register on Epistemic Modality in Spoken English: a Preliminary Study.” Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 10: 11–41.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing”, In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2006. “Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5): 569–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish (semi-) Auxiliaries. A Cognitive-Functional Approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality. On the Close Relationship between Two Different Categories.” Functions of Language 16 (1):44–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Pedro Gras. 2015. “On the Interactional Dimension of Evidentials: The Case of the Spanish Evidential Discourse Markers.” Discourse Studies 17 (2):141–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 1998. The Category of Evidentiality. Unpublished manuscript. University of New Mexico. Available online at [[URL]]
. 2013. “Semantic Distinctions of Evidentiality.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Dehkordi, Mojdeh, and Hamid Allami. 2012. “Evidentiality in Academic Writing.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2 (9):1895–1904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estellés, Maria. 2015. “Expressing Evidentiality through Prosody? Prosodic Voicing in Reported Speech in Spanish Colloquial Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 85: 138–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (in press). “What Genres Tell Us about Evidentials and vice versa: A Study of al parecer in Spanish Parliamentary Debates (1979–2015).” Pragmatics and society.
Estellés, Maria, and Marta Albelda. 2014. “Evidentials, Politeness and Prosody in Spanish: A Corpus Analysis.” Journal of Politeness Research 10 (1):29–62.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Evidencialidad, atenuación y descortesía en al parecer y por lo visto. Influencias del género discursivo.” In Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by Bert Cornillie. EUNSA: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. “Remarks on Evidential Hierarchies.” In The Construction of Meaning, ed. by David Beaver, Luis Casillas Martínez, Brady Z. Clark, and Stephan Kaufmann (eds.). Stanford: CSLI Publications. Available online at [[URL] ]
Figueras Bates, C. (2017). “La relevancia de los adverbios evidenciales.” In Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by Bert Cornillie, and Dámaso Izquierdo Alegría, 129-167. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fernández Jáen, Jorge. 2015. “Diachronic Evidentiality: from the Sense of Smell to the Expression of Knowledge.” eHumanista/IVITRA 8: 402–420.Google Scholar
Fitneva, Stanka A. 2009. “Evidentiality and Trust: The Effect of Informational Goals.” In Evidentiality: A Window into Language and Cognitive Development, ed. by Stanka A. Fitneva, and Tomoko Matsui, 49–61. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara. 2001. “Evidentiality: Authority, Responsibility, and Entitlement in English Conversation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 1–29.Google Scholar
García-Ramón, Amparo. (in press). “Primacía epistémica en géneros interaccionales: atenuación, intensificación y territorio.” Rilce.
García Negroni, María Marta. 2016. “Polifonía, evidencialidad citativa y tiempos verbales. Acerca de los usos citativos del futuro morfológico y del futuro perifrástico. In La evidencialidad en español: teoría y descripción, ed. by Ramón González, Dámaso Izquierdo, and Óscar Loureda, 279–302. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givon, Talmy. 1982. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Space.” Studies in Language 6(1): 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Condom, Montserrat; Roseano, Paolo; Borràs-Comes, Joan, and Pilar Prieto. 2017. “Epistemic and evidential textures in discourse: effects of register and debatability.” Lingua 186–187: 68–87.Google Scholar
González-Ramos, Elisa. 2005. “Por lo visto y al parecer: comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicas de evidencialidad en español actual.” Interlingüística 16 (1):541–554.Google Scholar
González Ramos, Elisa. 2016. “ Por lo visto y al parecer: evidencialidad y restricción del compromiso con la verdad de un contenido enunciado.” In La evidencialidad en español:teoría y descripción, ed. by Ramón González, Dámaso Izquierdo, and Óscar Loureda, 129–152. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2003. On Language and Linguistics. Londres: Continuun International Publishing.Google Scholar
Hanks, William. 2012. “Evidentiality in Social Interaction.” Pragmatics and Society 3 (2):169–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hassler, Gerda. 2010. “Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality and their Determination on a Deictic Basis. The Case of Romance Languages.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabrielle Diewald, and Elena Smirnova, 223–247. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin-New York.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1):1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Raymond, Geoffrey. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1):15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic discourse. Londres: Continuun International Publishing.Google Scholar
Izquierdo, Dámaso. 2016. Alcance y límites de la evidencialidad. Aspectos teóricos y propuesta de análisis aplicada a un conjunto de adverbios evidencialoides del español. Doctoral Dissertation. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1994. “The Theory of Territory of Information. The case of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 21 (1):67–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotwica, Dorota. 2013. “Los valores del significado de la partícula evidencial al parecer: la atenuación y el efecto de disociación.” In Estudios de lingüística: investigaciones, propuestas y aplicaciones, ed. by Adrián Cabedo et al., 403–410. Universitat de València: Valencia.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Evidential al parecer: Between the physical and the cognitive meaning in Spanish scientific prose of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries.” Journal of Pragmatics 85: 155–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Evolución del género artículo científico en español (1799–1920) a la luz de la expresión de la evidencialidad. PhD dissertation. University of Valencia.Google Scholar
. (in press). “Does the Source Matter? Specificity in Reportative Evidentiality in Spanish Scientific Discourse (1799–1920).” Pragmatics & Society.
Kotwica, D. 2018/this volume. “Exploring Evidentiality in Spanish Biology Articles (1850–1920): Intersubjectivity and Accessibility of Evidences.” In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish. Explorations across genres, ed. by Carolina Figueras Bates, and Adrián Cabedo Nebot, 49–72. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marcos Sánchez, Mercedes. 2006. “Evidencialidad y género discursivo.” In Análisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores, vol. I, ed. by Manuel Casado Velarde, M. et al., 579–592. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Subjetividad e intersubjetividad en los marcadores evidenciales formados por el verbo de percepción visual ver en español.” In La evidencialidad en español: teoría y descripción, ed. by Ramón González, Dámaso Izquierdo, and Óscar Loureda, 153–178. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana 2016. “Epistemicidad y posicionamiento discursivo: un estudio interlinguístico de la evidencialidad en el discurso periodístico en castellano y en inglés.” In La evidencialidad en español: teoría y descripción, ed. by Ramón González, Dámaso Izquierdo, and Óscar Loureda, 329–350. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Matsui, Tomoko, Yamamoto, Taeko, and McCagg, Peter. 2006. “On the Role of Language in Children’s Early Understanding of Others as Epistemic Beings.” Cognitive Development 21: 158–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCready, Eric. 2014. Reliability in Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2012. “Notions of (Inter)subjectivity.” English Text Construction 5(1): 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L. 1986. “The Evidential System of Kashaya.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 29–45. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna Peggy Li, Youngon Choi, and Chung-hye Han. 2007. “Evidentiality in Language and Cognition.” Cognition 103 (2):253–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, Giovanni. 2010. Academic and Professional Discourse Genres in Spanish. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payrató, Lluís. 1998. “Variació funcional, llengua oral i registres.” Oralment. Estudis de variació funcional, ed. by Lluís Payrató, 9–33. Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. 2005. “Por lo visto.” In Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español, ed. by Antonio Briz, José Portolés, and Salvador Pons. Available online at [URL].
Salvador Salvador, Francisco (coord.). 2007. El habla culta de granada: Materiales para su estudio. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics 3, eds. Peter Cole, and John Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2012. ““Who Knows Best?”: Evidentiality and Epistemic Asymmetry in Conversation.” Pragmatics and Society 3 (2):294–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2008. “Lexical vs. Grammatical Evidentiality in French and Italian.” Linguistics 46 (5):917–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. (ed.) 2007. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2010. “Hearsay in European Languages: Toward an Integrative Account of Grammatical and Lexical Marking.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabrielle Diewald, and Elena Smirnova, 59–129. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Willet, Thomas. 1988. “A Cross-linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality.” Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Kotwica, Dorota & Marta Albelda Marco
2024. Degrees of disagreement and reliability of information sources in pro- and anti-vaccination comments on Facebook. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil
2021. Chapter 12. Evaluative that structures in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Estellés Arguedas, Maria
2020. The Evolution of Parliamentary Debates in Light of the Evolution of Evidentials: Al Parecer and Por lo Visto in 40 Years of Parliamentary Proceedings from Spain. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Figueras Bates, Carolina
2019. Razonamiento y Vigilancia Epistémica: Una Explicación Relevantista de los Evidencialespor lo vistoyse ve que. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Albelda Marco, Marta
2018. Evidentials as a mark of genre. Pragmatics and Society 9:3 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Cabedo Nebot, Adrián & Carolina Figueras Bates
2018. Chapter 1. Evidentiality in discourse. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.