Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics and its Interfaces
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 294] 2018
► pp. 85–119

Pragmatics vs rhetoric

Political discourse at the pragmatics-rhetoric interface

| Strömstad AcademySweden
Pragmatics and rhetoric display a range of commonalities and convergences in that both are concerned with discursive and extra-discursive strategies that enable the negotiation and re-negotiation of context-situated meaning, and the co-performance of interpersonal and institutional relationships in terms of intentions and expectations. At the same time, while pragmatics and rhetoric display differences in analytical focus, they complement each other, through specific insights into, e.g., interactive uses of addressing forms and goal-oriented speech acts (pragmatics) and figurative language use and argumentation processes (rhetoric). The aim of this chapter is to explore the interface between pragmatics and rhetoric, arguing that a pragma-rhetorical approach provides systematic tools for a multi-level analysis of discursive contextualisation of political power struggle and of metadiscursive framing of question-answer political confrontation.
Keywords: pragmatics, rhetoric, pragma-rhetoric, political discourse, metadiscourse, political interview, parliamentary debate, argumentation, contextualization, rhetorical appeal
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Target of the present study
  • 3.Pragmatics and rhetoric revisited
    • 3.1The pragmatics-rhetoric interface
    • 3.2Interfacing the pragmatics and the rhetoric of political discourse
  • 4.Pragma-rhetorical approach to political discourse
    • 4.1Contextualisation through meaning negotiation and re-negotiation in political interviews
    • 4.2Metadiscourse framing strategies in question-answer sequencing in parliamentary debates
  • 5.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.05ili
References (95)
References
Althaus, Scott L. 2012. “What’s Good and Bad in Political Communication Research? Normative Standards for Evaluating Media and Citizen Performance.” In The Sage Handbook of Political Communication, ed. by Holli A. Semetko, and Margaret Scammell, 97–112. London, UK and Thousand Oaks, US: SAGE Publications Limited.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Myron J., and Jan Kubik. 2013. Anthropology and Political Science: A Convergent Approach. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Atkins, J., Alan Finlayson, James Martin, and Nick Turnbull (eds). 2014. Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Stephen R., Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, and Liam Stanley. 2012. “Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron.” Parliamentary Affairs 2: 1–28.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Aditi. 2006. “Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Press Conferences.” Discourse & Society 17(2): 173–203.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bitzer, Lloyd. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1: 1–14Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C.. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter. 2000. “New Labour, New Rhetoric? An Analysis of the Rhetoric of Tony Blair.” In Beyond Public Speech and Symbols: Explorations in the Rhetoric of Politicians and the Media, ed. by Christ’l De Landtsheer, and Ofer Feldman, 3–16. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul A. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Covino, William A. and David A. Jolliffe. 1995. Rhetoric: Concepts, Definitions, Boundaries. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Cummings, Louise. 2005. Pragmatics: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna 1995. “Pronominal Choice, Identity and Solidarity in Political Discourse.” Text 15 (3): 379–410.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degano, Chiara. 2014. “Presidential Press Conferences: An Analysis of a Dialogic Genre.” In Genres and Genre Theory in Transition: Specialized Discourses Across Media and Modes, ed. by Giuliana Garzone, and Cornelia Ilie). Boca Raton, FA: BrownWalker Press.Google Scholar
De Landtsheer, Christ’l, and Ofer Feldman (eds). 2000. Beyond Public Speech and Symbols: Explorations in the Rhetoric of Politicians and the Media. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2018. “The Interface between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Analyses Pragmatiques. Communications 32: 11–60 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Elliott, Judy and Peter Bull. 1996. “A question of threat: face threats in questions posed during televised political interviews”. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 6: 49–72.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita (ed). 2013. The Pragmatics of Political Discourse: Explorations Across Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 33–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, Alan. 2007. “From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations 9(4): 545–563.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark, and Philip Norton (eds). 1993. Parliamentary Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2010. “Hedging in Political Discourse: The Bush 2007 Press Conferences.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Urszula Okulska, and Piotr Cap, 201–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3, Speech acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Dan F. 2003. Political Communication: Rhetoric, Government, and Citizens. 2nd edition. State College PA: Strata Publishing.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1991. “Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews.” In Broadcast talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra, Karen Grainger, and Louise Mullany. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Political Apologies.” Discourse & Society 17(6): 715–737.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrick, James A.. 2001. The History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. 1972. “On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp.269–293). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 1994. What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Question-Response Argumentation in Talk Shows”. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (8): 975–999.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Cliché-Based Metadiscursive Argumentation in the Houses of Parliament.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1): 65–84.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003a. “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 1(2): 269–291.Google Scholar
. 2003b. “Parenthetically Speaking: Parliamentary Parentheticals as Rhetorical Strategies.” In Dialogue Analysis 2000: Selected Papers from the 10th IADA Anniversary Conference, Bologna 2000, ed. by Marina Bondi, and Sorin Stati, 253–264. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Insulting as (Un)parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by P. Bayley, 45–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Towards a Pragma-Rhetorical Approach: From Rhetoric to Pragmatics and Beyond.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Ashok Thorat, 16–37. Institute of Advanced Studies in English, Aundh, Pune.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Talking the Talk, Walking the Walk: Candidate Profiles in Election Campaign Interviews”. In Giovanni Gobber, Sibilla Cantarini, Sara Cigada, Maria Cristina Gatti and Silvia Gilardoni (eds.). L’analisi linguistica e letteraria XVI, Special Issue, 2: 543–557. (Proceedings of the IADA Workshop Word Meaning in Argumentative Dialogue – Homage to Sorin Stati).Google Scholar
. 2009a. “Strategies of Refutation by Definition: A Pragma-Rhetorical Approach to Refutations in American Public Speech.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation. Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 35–51. Berlin: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. “Argumentative Functions of Parentheticals in Parliamentary Debates.” In Discourse and politics, ed. by Gloria Álvarez-Benito, Gabriela Fernández-Díaz, and Isabel Íñigo-Mora, 61–79. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2010a. “Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 885–911.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. “Identity Co-Construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, 57–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “The Gender Divide in Election Campaign Interviews: Questioning Barack Obama and Calling into Question Hillary Clinton.” Redescriptions – Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 15: 125–148.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Gendering Confrontational Rhetoric: Discursive Disorder in the British and Swedish Parliaments.” Democratization 20(3): 501–521.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. “Questions and Questioning.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, Boston: John Wiley & Sons.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. “Follow-ups as Multifunctional Questioning and Answering Strategies in Prime Minister’s Questions.” In The dynamics of political discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin. 195–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Parliamentary Discourse and Deliberative Rhetoric”. In Parliaments and parliamentarism: A Comparative History of Disputes about a European Concept, ed. by Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen,133–145. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia and Cezar Ornatowski. 2016. “Central and Eastern European Parliamentary Rhetoric since the Nineteenth Century: The Case of Romania and Poland.” In Parliaments and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History, of Disputes about a European Concept, ed. by Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, 192–215. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2017a. “Questioning the Questionable: Arguments and Counter-arguments in Political Accountability Interviews.” In Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Giuliana Garzone. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “Parliamentary Debates.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics (section “Genres for Political Action”), ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Bernhard Forchtner. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jiang, Xiangying. 2006. “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Differences in US and Chinese Press Conferences: The Case of the North Korea Nuclear Crisis.” Discourse & Society 17(2): 237–257.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 1999[1980]. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 2013. “Strategic Maneuvering in the Political Rhetoric of Barack Obama.” Journal of Language and Politics 12(3): 357–377.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Peter. 1999. “Politeness and Political Correctness: Ideological Implications.” Pragmatics 9(1): 155–161.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Elise. 2011. “The Playful is Political: The Metapragmatics of Internet Rape-joke Arguments.” Language in Society 40 (2): 137–168.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda. 2004. “Political Interviews as Hybrid Genre.” Text 24(3): 353–397.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1979. “Activity Types and Language”. Linguistics 17: 356–399.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewellen, Ted C. 2003. Political Anthropology: An Introduction, 3rd edition. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2012. “Prime Minister’s Questions as Political Ritual.” British Politics 7(4): 314–340.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James. 2014. Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, James, Judi Atkins, Alan Finlayson, and Nick Turnbull (eds.). 2014 Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michel. 2010. “The Brussels School of Rhetoric: From the New Rhetoric to Problematology.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 43(4): 403–429.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles. 1938. Foundation of the Theory of Signs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2018. “Narrative Studies versus Pragmatics (of Narrative).” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 122–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2005. “Political Communications.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. by James D. Wright. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1993. “Indexicality and Deixis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 1–43.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ornatowski, Cezar M. 2012. “The Idea of Politics in Political Rhetoric.” Forum Artis Rhetoricae 2: 7–21.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrecht-Tyteca. 2006[1969]. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson, and Purell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Reicher, Stephen, and Nicolas Hopkins. 1996. “Self-category Constructions in Political Rhetoric: An Analysis of Thatcher’s and Kinnock’s Speeches Concerning the British Miners’ Strike (1984–85).” European Journal of Social Psychology 26(3): 353–371.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard (ed). 1967. The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Ivor Armstrong. 1965. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Robert, and Rhodri Walters. 2006. How Parliament Works (6th ed.). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy. 1996. “Polyphony”. In J. Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sanders, R. E. 1978. “Utterances, Actions, and Rhetorical Inquiry.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 11(2): 114–133.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina (ed). 1997. Analyzing Political Speeches. London: Short Run Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5(1): 1–23.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. “How Performatives Work.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 535–558.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, Ajantha. 2012. “Political Anthropology.” In Anthropology, ed. by John L. Jackson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E.. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Nick. 2017. “Political Rhetoric and Its Relationship to Context: A New Theory of the Rhetorical Situation, the Rhetorical and the Political.” Critical Discourse Studies 14 (2): 115–131.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tzanne, Angeliki. 1999. Talking at Cross-Purposes: The Dynamics of Miscommunication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vincent, Joan (ed). 2002. The Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1981. “The Fallacy of Many Questions.” Logique et Analyse 95–96: 291–313.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1989. Question-Reply Argumentation. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1997. “Judging How Heavily a Question is Loaded: A Pragmatic Method.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, vol. 17, 53–71.Google Scholar
1998. “Appeal to Popular Opinion.” University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
2010. Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
2013. Methods of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, Ken. 2002. Making Sense of Humour: Some Pragmatic and Political Aspects. PhD thesis. London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Marinho, Cristina & Michael Billig
2024. Chapter 6. How can governments be prevented from manipulating statistics about Covid-19?. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Stopfner, Maria
2024. Chapter 1. Spanish influenza 1918/19. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Strukowska, Marta E.
2024. Exploring Speech Act Patterns In Anthropological Pragmatics. LINGUISTICA SILESIANA ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Botaș, Adina
2023. A dialogic speech act approach to ridiculing references in the French presidential debate of 2022. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2021. Discussion, dispute or controversy?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2021. Evasive answers vs. aggressive questions. In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2024. Chapter 3. Manipulating citizens’ beliefs and emotions. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Kuznyetsova, Ganna
2021. Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :23 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Bjaiya al-mas'ud, Hameed Hassoon & Abdullah Muhammad Naif
2020. Deception in American Propaganda: A Pragma-Rhetorical Perspective. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 27:10 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Drew, Paul
2018. The interface between pragmatics and conversation analysis. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2018. Discourse pragmatics. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane
2018. Translation studies and pragmatics. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Norrick, Neal R.
2018. Narrative studies versus pragmatics (of narrative). In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Pereira, Gerardine M.
2018. The interface between pragmatics and gesture studies. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. The interface between pragmatics and internet-mediated communication. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.