Chapter 1
Networking engagement in professional practices
Towards an integrative view
In this chapter I revisit the concept of metadiscursive engagement, track its major courses of research up to date, and discuss the interpersonal and discursive assumptions it entails. In light of these assumptions, I draw connections among the different contributions to this volume, present a networked picture of engagement resulting from their different understandings, and finally pinpoint challenges and emerging issues. The global and open vision of engagement offered here not only intends to bring together the three major theoretical frameworks resorted to in this volume (i.e. the Appraisal System, the Hylandian Metadiscourse Model and Multimodality), but also to suggest relating them with the idea of ‘distance’ between sender and addressee, explored by both the Appraisal System itself and the pragmatic theories of Proximisation and Politeness.
Article outline
- 1.Overview: Framing research on professional engagement
- 1.1Meaning-making resources and theoretical eclecticism
- 2.Issues arising: Research directions and challenges
- 2.1Interpersonal assumptions
- 2.2Discursive assumptions
- 3.Broadening the notion: Engagement envisaged as (di)stance
- 4.Closing reflections
-
Notes
-
References
References (96)
References
Ädel, Annelie. 2010. “
Just to Give You Kind of a Map of Where We Are Going: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 69–97.
Ädel, Annelie, and Anna Mauranen. 2010. “Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspective.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 1–40.
Artemeva, Natasha, and Aviva Freedman, eds. 2006. Rhetorical Genre Studies and Beyond. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Inkshed Publications.
Aull, Laura L., Dineth Bandarage, and Meredith R. Miller 2017. “Generality in Student and Expert Epistemic Stance: A Corpus Analysis of First-Year, Upper Level, and Published Academic Writing.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 26: 29–41. 

Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist. Ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bamford, Julia, and Marina Bondi, eds. 2006. Managing Interaction in Professional Discourse: Intercultural and Interdiscoursal Perspectives. Rome: Officina Edizioni.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1994. “Generic Integrity in Professional Discourse.” In Text and Talk in Professional Contexts, ed. by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linell, and Bengt Nordberg, 61–76. Uppsala, Sweden: ASLA, Skriftserie 6.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1995. “Genre Mixing in Professional Communication: The case of ‘private intentions’ v. ‘socially recognised purposes’.” In Explorations in English for Professional Communication, ed. by Paul Bruthiaux, Tim Boswood, and Bertha Du-Babcock, 1–19. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1997. “Genre-mixing in Academic Introductions.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (3): 181–196. 

Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Breeze, Ruth. 2012. Rethinking Academic Writinf Pedagogy for the European University. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2014. “Political Style.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by Peter Stockwell and Sara Whiteley, 536–557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cockcroft, Robert, Susan Cockcroft, Craig Hamilton, and Laura Hidalgo Downing. 2014 [1995]. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Du Bois, John. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Edmonds, Ernest, Lizzie Miller, and Matthew Connell. 2006. “On Creative Engagement.” Visual Communication 5 (3): 307–322. 

Engberg, Jan. 2012. “Specialized Communication and Culture, Practice, Competence, and Knowledge: Implications and Derived Insights.” In Applied Linguistics Today: Research and Perspectives. Angewandte Linguistik heute: Forschung und Perspektiven, ed. by Leonard Pon, Vladimir Karabalic, and Sanja Cimer, 109–130. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
Fairclough, Norman. 1993. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse and Society 4 (2): 133–168. 

Gambetti, Rossella, and Guendalina Graffigna. 2010. “The Concept of Engagement: A Systematic Analysis of the Ongoing Marketing Debate.” International Journal of Market Research 52 (6): 801–826. 

Gotti, Maurizio. 2008. Investigating Specialized Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
Green, Andrew. 2007. “Are Viewers ‘engaged’ with advertising? Does It Matter?” WARC Media FAQs, March 2007. [URL] Last accessed June 2015.
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise. 2009. Professional Discourse. London: Continuum.
Harré, Rom, and van Langenhove, Luk. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hairston, Maxine, and Michael Keene. 2003 [1981]. Successful Writing. 5th edn. New York/London: W. W. Norton.
Heath, Robert. 2007. “How Do We Predict Advertising Attention and Engagement?” University of Bath School of Management Working Paper Series. Paper 09.
Heylighen, Francis, and Jean-Marc Dewaele. 1999. Formality of Language: Definition, Measurement and Behavioral Determinants. Internal Report. Center “Leo Apostel” , Free University of Brussels. [URL]
Hinds, John 1987. “Reader versus Writer Responsibility: A New Typology.” In Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text, ed. by Ulla Connor and Robert B. Kaplan, 141–152. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hyland, Ken. 2001. “Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles.” Written Communication 18: 549–574. 

Hyland, Ken. 2003. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Hyland, Ken. 2004a [2000]. Disciplinary Discourse: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, Ken. 2004b. “Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 133–151. 

Hyland, Ken. 2005a. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
Hyland, Ken. 2005b. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7: 173–192. 

Hyland, Ken. 2008a. “Different Strokes for Different Folks: Disciplinary Variation in Academic Writing.” In Language and Discipline perspectives on Academic Discourse, ed. by Kjersti Fløttum, 89–108. Newcsatle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Hyland, Ken. 2008b. “Constraint versus Creativity: Identity and Disciplinarity in Academic Writing.” In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, 25–52. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hyland, Ken. 2009a. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.
Hyland, Ken. 2009b. “Corpus Informed Discourse Analysis: The Case of Academic Engagement.” In Academic Writing. At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, ed. by Maggie Charles, Diane Pecorari, and Susan Hunston, 110–128. London: Continuum.
Hyland, Ken. 2010. “Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 116–127. 

Hyland, Ken. 2011a. “Projecting an Academic Identity in Some reflective Genres.” Ibérica 21 (Spring): 9–30.
Hyland, Ken. 2011b. “Disciplines and Discourses: Social Interactions in the Construction of Knowledge. In Writing in the Knowledge Society, ed. by Doreen Starke-Meyerring, Anthony Paré, Natasha Artemeva, Miriam Horne, and Larissa Yousoubova, 193–214. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press
Hyland, Ken. 2012. “Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year Reports.” In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 134–150. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Hyland, Ken. 2017. “Metadiscourse: What Is It and Where Is It Going?”. Journal of Pragmatics 113: 16–29. 

Hyland, Ken. 2018. The Essential Hyland. Studies in Applied Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse. 2004. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156–177. 

Hyland, Ken, and Feng (Kevin) Jiang. 2016. “’We Must Conclude that’…: A Diachronic Study of Academic Engagement.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24: 29–42. 

Hyland, Ken, and Feng (Kevin) Jiang. 2017. “Is Academic Writing Becoming More Informal?” English for Specific Purposes 40–51. 

Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Jones, Rodney. 2014. “Advertising Culture.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by Peter Stockwell and Sara Whiteley, 520–535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Kastberg, Peter. 2007. “Knowledge Communication: “The Emergence of a Third Order Discipline.” In Kommunikation in Bewegung: Multimedialer und Multilingualer Wissenstransfer in der Experten-Laien-Kommunikation, ed. by Claudia Villiger, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 7–24. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006 [1996]. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 

Lane, Janet, and Lange, Ellen 1999. Writing Clearly. An Editing Guide. 2nd edn. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2007. “Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.” Global Environmental Change 17. 

Machin, David. 2007. Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Mauranen, Anna. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Mauranen, Anna. 2010. “Discourse Reflexivity - A Discourse Universal? The Case of ELF” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 13–40.
Molino, Alessandra. 2010. “Personal and Impersonal Authorial References: A Contrastive Study of English and Italian in Linguistics Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 86–101. 

Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction. A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge. 

O’Toole, Michael. 1994. The Language of Displayed Art. London, UK: Continuum.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2010. “The Discourse Functions of Metadiscourse in Published Academic Writing: Issues of Culture and Language.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 41–68.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2012. Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language. London: Bloomsbury.
Pinker, Steven. 2014. The Sense of Style. London: Penguin.
Ross-Larson, Bruce. 1999. Stunning Sentences. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Sales, Hazel E. 2006. Professional Communication in Engineering. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Sancho Guinda, Carmen. 2012a. “Flexibility Features in Patent Writing.” Ibérica 24: 185–210.
Sancho Guinda, Carmen. 2012b. “Proximal Positioning in Students’ Graph Commentaries.” In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 166–183. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Sancho Guinda, Carmen. 2014. “Engagement in NTSB Decisions on Aviation Case Appeals.” In Interpersonality in Legal Genres, ed. by Ruth Breeze, Maurizio Gotti, and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 181–211. Bern: Peter Lang. 

Sancho Guinda, Carmen. 2015. “Genres on the Move: Currency and Erosion of the Genre Moves Construct.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19: 73–87. 

Sancho Guinda, Carmen. 2016. “Semiotic Shortcuts: The Graphical Abstract Strategies of Engineering Students.” Hermes 55: 61–90. [URL]
Sancho Guinda, Carmen. 2017. “Transmitting Authority in Risk Communication: An Exploration of US Air-Accident Dockets Online.” InPower, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres, ed. by María Ángeles Orts, Ruth Breeze, and Maurizio Gotti, 211–336. Bern: Peter Lang.
Sancho Guinda, Carmen, and Ken Hyland. 2012. “Introduction: A Context-Sensitive Approach to Stance and Voice.” In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 1–11. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Simpson, Paul. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. 

Strunk, William Jr., and E. B. White. 1972 [1959]. The Elements of Style. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Swales, John M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak 1994. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. A Course for Non-native Speakers of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Sword, Helen. 2012. Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tichy, Henrietta J. (With Silvia Fourdrinier). 1988. Effective Writing for Engineers, Managers, Scientists. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
Trimble, John R. 2000 [1975]. Writing with Style. Conversations on the Art of Writing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Turk, Christopher, and John Kirkman. 1996 [1982]. Effective Writing. Improving Scientific, Technical and Business Communication. London: E & FN Spon.
Vassileva, Irena. 2001. “Commitment and Detachment in English and Bulgarian Academic Writing.” English for Specific Purposes 20 (1): 83–102. 

Wallwork, Adrian. 2014a. Presentations, Demos, and Training Sessions. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer. 

Wallwork, Adrian. 2014b. User Guides, Manuals and Technical Writing. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer. 

Wallwork, Adrian. 2016. English for Writing Research Papers. 2nd edn. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer. 

Wang, Alex. 2006. “Advertising Engagement: A Driver of Message Involvement in on Message Effects.” Journal of Advertising Research 46 (4): 355–368. 

Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Zinsser, William. 2006 [1976]. On Writing Well. New York: Collins.
Zwickle, Adam, and Robyn S. Wilson. 2014. “Construing Risk Implications for Risk Communication.” In Effective Risk Communication, ed. by Joseph Árvai and Louie Rivers, III, 190–203. New York/London: Routledge-Earthscan.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Alwohaibi, Hala Abdulrahman & Hesham Suleiman Alyousef
2023.
An Investigation of Engagement Resources in the World Cup 2022 Newspaper Articles in the Arab World Media.
Journal of Contemporary Language Research 2:2
► pp. 118 ff.

Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2023.
¿Idiolectos o tecnolectos? Resquicios de impronta personal en la descripción de procedimientos técnicos.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93
► pp. 17 ff.

Sánchez-Jiménez, David & Paulina Meza
2022.
Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la escritura académica y profesional.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90
► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.