Cover not available
Part of
Emotion in Discourse
Edited by J. Lachlan Mackenzie and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 302] 2019
► pp. 213–244

Chapter 9
My anger was justified surely?

Epistemic markers across British English and German Emotion Events

| University of Augsburg (Germany)
In this chapter, I explore the role of epistemic markers as sub-units of analysis in Emotion Events, in particular ANGER events, from a cross-linguistic perspective. The corpus study extends the Emotion Event Model and reports on findings based on 248 written narratives experimentally elicited from British English and German university students. Overall, German writers displayed more ANGER events than the British and males used more epistemic markers than females. In the British Emotion Events, more markers of ‘low’ certainty were used in contrast to more markers of ‘high’ certainty in the German ones. The findings underline the importance of epistemic markers for the modeling of emotion discourse.
Keywords: Emotion Event, epistemic markers, intersubjective positioning, contrastive discourse analysis, corpus linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Un-/certainty
    • 2.2A contrastive perspective – EM in (British) English and German
    • 2.3Emotion Events
      • 2.3.1A cognitive semantic model
      • 2.3.2Epistemic markers in emotion events – an extended model
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
    • 3.1The AWE corpus
    • 3.2Coding and analysis
  • 4.Contrastive findings
    • 4.1Emotion Events and ANGER events across British English and German
    • 4.2EM + [ANGER] – qualitative analysis
    • 4.3EM + [EMOTION]/ [ANGER] – forms and functions
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1EM in British and German Emotion Events Differ
    • 5.2Revisiting models on emotion discourse
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 27 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.09fro
References (70)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura. 2018. “Emotion and Appraisal Processes in Language: How Are They Related?” In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction, ed. by María de los Ángeles Gómez González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie, 227‒250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1935 [1981]. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist, tr. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1‒48. DOI logo.
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Angel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio. This volume. “Rethinking Martin & White’s Affect Taxonomy: A Psychologically-Inspired Approach to the Linguistic Expression of Emotion.”
Becker, Anette. 2009. “Modality and Engagement in British and German Political Interviews.” Languages in Contrast 9 (1): 5‒22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion Talk across Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. “Indirectness or Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131‒146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & Elite Olshtain. 1989. “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech-Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics 5 (3): 196‒213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bognelli, Ramona & Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2008. Indicatori linguistici percettivi e cognitivi. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Burnham, Kenneth P. & David R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 1998. Contrastive Functional Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 1991. “The Sociocultural Dimension: The Dilemma of the German-Speaking Scholar.” In Subject-Oriented Texts, ed. by Hartmut Schröder, 49‒68. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1995. “The Expression of Root and Epistemic Possibility in English.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Joan J. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & D. Allan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Angela. 2001. “‘Surely You Knew!’: Surely as a Marker of Evidentiality and Stance.” Functions of Language 8 (2): 251‒282.Google Scholar
Dziwirek, Katarzyna & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk. 2010. Complex Emotions and Grammatical Mismatches: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 16. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Eckart de Castilho, Richard, Éva Mújdricza-Maydt, Seid M. Yimam, Silvana Hartmann, Iryna Gurevych, Anette Frank & Chris Biemann. 2016. “A Web-Based Tool for the Integrated Annotation of Semantic and Syntactic Structures.” Proceedings of the LT4DH Workshop at COLING. Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 1998. “Conceptual Integration Networks.” Cognitive Science 22: 133–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2009. “Challenges in Contrast: A Function-To-Form Approach.” Languages in Contrast 9: 73‒97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “I think this is I mean perhaps this is too erm too tough a view of the world but I often think … Redundancy as Contextualization Device.” Language Sciences 33: 255‒267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “ I think, I mean and I believe in Political Discourse: Collocates, Functions and Distribution.” Functions of Language 21: 67‒94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita & Marjut Johansson. 2010. “Cognitive Verbs in Context: A Contrastive Analysis of English and French Argumentative Discourse.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15: 240‒266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fronhofer, Nina-Maria. 2015. “Nearly a Bit Angry or Just So Happy – Intensifiers as Contextualization Cues.” Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée. Volume 2: 29‒49.Google Scholar
. Accepted. “So Angry or Slightly Irritated of Sorts – ANGER Events in British English and German.” In Proceedings of “Emotion Concepts in Use”, Workshop at Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
. In preparation. Emotion Concepts in Context. A Contrastive Analysis of British English and German Discourse.
Givón, Talmy. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. 2 Volumes. Amsterdam/Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. John. 1992a. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin, 229‒252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992b. “Contextualization Revisited.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio, 39‒53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York: Arnold.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2006. “Communicative Styles in English and German.” European Journal of English Studies 10: 249‒267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Using a Corpus to Investigate Stance Quantitatively and Qualitatively.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 27–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Phil & Keith Oatley. 1989. “The Language of Emotions: An Analysis of a Semantic Field.” Cognition and Emotion 3: 81‒123.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja. 2016. Contrastive Pragmatics and Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krawczak, Karolina & Dylan Glynn. 2015. “Operationalizing Mirativity: A Usage-Based Quantitative Study of Constructional Construal in English.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13 (2): 353‒382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz. 1989. “Towards a Typology of Contrastive Studies.” Contrastive Pragmatics, ed. by Wiesław Oleksy, 55‒72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1990. Contrasting Languages: The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampropoulou, Martha. 2014. “The Expression of Emotions in Conditionals: A Study of Modern Greek Political Speech.” In Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context, ed. by Fabienne Baider & Georgeta Cislaru, 138‒157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987, 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (vols. 1 & 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (ed.). 1998. Lexical Semantics, Cognition and Philosophy. Łódź: Łódź University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Events as They Are.” In Turning Points in the Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Piotr Stalmaszczyk, 35‒63. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara & Katarzyna Dziwirek (eds.). 2009. Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara & Paul Wilson. 2010. “A Contrastive Perspective on Emotions: Surprise.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 8: 321‒350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “English fear and Polish strach in Contrast: GRID Approach and Cognitive Corpus Linguistic Methodology.” In Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook, ed. by Johnny J. R. Fontaine, Klaus R. Scherer & Cristina Soriano, 425‒436. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa. 2012. “Current Emotion Research in the Language Sciences.” Emotion Review 4 (4): 432‒443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markkanen, Raija & Hartmut Schröder. 1989. “Hedging as a Translation Problem in Scientific Texts.” In Special Languages: From Human Thinking to Thinking Machines, ed. by Christer Laurén & Marianne Nordman, 171‒179. London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2004. “Mourning: How We Get Aligned.” Discourse & Society 15: 321‒344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, Keith, Dacher Keltner & Jennifer M. Jenkins. 2006. Understanding Emotions. Oxford/Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parrot, Gerrod W. 2001. Emotions in Social Psychology. Philadelphia PA/Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2008. “Emotion and Emotion-Laden Words in the Bilingual Lexicon.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11: 147‒164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Planalp, Sally. 1999. Communicating Emotion: Social, Moral, and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL: [URL].
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika. 2015. “Language and Emotion: The Cognitive Linguistic Perspective.” In Emotion in Language, ed. by Ulrike M. Lüdtke, 157‒174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer. 2007. The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite, Marta Carretero & Jennifer Hinnell. 2014. “Loving and Hating the Movies in English, German and Spanish.” Contrastive Linguistics 14 (1): 127‒161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Mary. 2010. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich. 1988. Syntax der englischen Adverbialien. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin N. 1995. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, tr. by Ladislav Matjka & Irwin R. Titunik. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet B. Bavelas & Don D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
White, Peter R.R. 2003. “Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance.” Text 23 (2): 259‒284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilce, James M. 2009. Language and Emotion. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yimam, Seid M., Richard Eckart de Castilho, Iryna Gurevych & Chris Biemann. 2014. “Automatic Annotation Suggestions and Custom Annotation Layers in WebAnno.” In Proceedings of ACL, demo session. Baltimore, MD, USA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
2022. I wanted to honour your journal, and you spat in my face: emotive (im)politeness and face in the English and Russian blind peer review. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.