Cover not available
Part of
The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 99–132

Chapter 5
T-V address practices in Italian

Diachronic, diatopic, and diastratic analyses

| Université catholique de Louvain
| Université catholique de Louvain

The aim of this research was to examine the Italian pronouns of address by means of (1) diachronic, (2) diatopic, and (3) diastratic analyses. Drawing on corpus linguistics, we compiled a two million-word corpus made up of narrative texts written by both men and women writers from the Italian classic literature. (1) Our outcomes confirm that the most recurrent pronoun is tu, whereas Voi and Lei quantitatively come after. With respect to politeness strategies, the pronoun Voi appeared with a higher frequency during the 19th century, whereas Lei was more recurrent during the 20th and the 21st centuries. (2) Our data suggest that, unpredictably, both pronouns tu and Lei would be idiosyncratic to Southerners and Voi to Northerners in our diachronic corpus, whereas both tu and Voi appear to be typical of individuals from the South and Lei from the North in our contemporary corpus. This also confirms some tendencies: the current regional use of Voi as the V-form in the South as well as the increase in the usage of tu. (3) Men writers would tend to be more polite than women authors. Besides, women writers who supported the fascist regime tended to make use of the pronoun Voi in order to comport with its politics of pronouns. On the contrary, antifascist women had the tendency to use the pronoun Lei. Contrary to the bulk of research, the outcomes of this research emphasise men’s politeness rather than women’s while adding up crucial data on the temporal evolution of the pronouns.

Keywords: corpus, Italian, authors, literature, gender, diachronic, diatopic, diastratic, sociolinguistics, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contemporary address practises in Italian
  • 3.A historical survey
  • 4.Caveats
  • 5.Research questions and hypotheses
  • 6.Corpora
  • 7.Methodology
  • 8.Presentation of the results
    • 8.1.Diachronic analysis
    • 8.2Diatopic analysis
    • 8.3Diastratic analysis
  • 9.Men are politer than women
  • 10.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.05mae
References

Bibliography

“Allocutivi, pronomi.”
2010 Enciclopedia dell’italiano. Roma: Treccani. Retrieved March 22 from [URL]Google Scholar
Angle, John
1981 “Gender and Prestige Preference in Language”. Sex Roles 7 (4): 449–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano
1980 La variabilità sociale della lingua. Torino: Loescher.Google Scholar
Bernardini, Petra
2007 Tre romanzieri a confronto in una prospettiva femminista: Maraini, Moravia e Morante. Lunds Universitet, Lund.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert
1972 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity”. In Language and Social Context, ed. by Pier Paolo Giglioli, 253–276. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruni, Francesco
1992 L’italiano nelle regioni. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Cadioli, Alberto, Decleva, Enrico, and Spinazzola, Vittorio
1999 La Mediazione editoriale. Milano: Il saggiatore.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Munaro, Nicola
2009 Italiano, italiani regionali e dialetti. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Castellani, Arrigo
1982 “Quanti erano gli italofoni nel 1861?” Studi linguistici italiani 8: 3- 26.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, Angelo, and Mordenti, Raul
1985 I libri di famiglia in Italia. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael G., Norrby, Catrin, and Warren, Jane
2009 Language and human relations styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coletti, Vittorio
2015 Grammatica dell’italiano adulto: l’italiano di oggi per gli italiani di oggi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Comba, Eugenio
1875 Breve corso razionale di grammatica italiana corredato di esercizi d’applicazione ad uso degli alunni delle scuole tecniche, normali e magistrali. Torino: Petrini.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko. M., and Burdelski, Matthew
2017 “(Im)politeness: Language Socialization.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Z. Kádár, 255–279 Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Marcel
2004 A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguistics. Studies in Linguistic and Cultural Anthropology. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio
1976 Storia linguistica dell’Italia unita (1. ed.). Roma, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
2014 Storia linguistica dell’Italia repubblicana dal 1946 ai nostri giorni. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
2017 Storia linguistica d’Italia dall’Unità a oggi (ebook ed.). Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
De Negri, F. A.
1868 Regole pratiche di grammatica italiana per uso dei soli toscani nelle scuole serali e rurali. Firenze: Cellini.Google Scholar
Dogliani, Patrizia
2008 Il fascismo degli italiani: una storia sociale. Torino: UTET Libreria.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
2015 Umberto Eco: “Così il darci del Tu rischia di impoverire la nostra memoria e il nostro apprendimento”. La Repubblica, September 14. Retrieved 22 March 2018, from [URL]Google Scholar
Edwards, John
2011 Challenges in the Social Life of Language. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felloni, Maria Chiara
2011 Prosodia sociofonetica: l’italiano parlato e percepito a Parma. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol, and Hajek, John
2015 “Address in Italian academic interactions: the power of distance and (non)-reciprocity”. In Address practice as social action: European perspectives, ed. by Catrin Norrby and Camilla Wide, 632–652. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elisabeth
1997 “Sex, Speech, and Stereotypes: Why Women Use Prestige Speech Forms more often than Men”. Language in Society 26 (1): 47–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goudar, Luigi
1810 Nuova grammatica italiana-francese, di Lodovico Goudar… Novissima edizione… repilogata riguardo a’ dittonghi da M. P., professore di lingua francese. Torino: Botta Prato e Paravia.Google Scholar
Granati, Cesare
2014 Luigi Pirandello: vita e opere. Padova: Goodmood.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
1996 “Male-female speaking practices across cultures”. In Contrastive Sociolinguistics, ed. by Marlies Hellinger and Ulrich Ammon, 447–473. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, Larry
2003 Step-by-Step Basic Statistics Using SAS: Student Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publisher.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1994 An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1995 Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Howell, David
2016 Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, Giuseppe
1999 Il fascismo sintetico. Letteratura e ideologia negli anni Trenta. Milano: Greco e Greco.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
1998 Les interactions verbales Tome 1 Approche interactionnelle et structure des conversations. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Kertesz-Vial, Elisabeth
2014 “Luigi Pirandello dal 1929 al 1935: un improbabile esiliato volontario”. In Già troppe volte esuli. Letteratura di frontiera e di esilio, 2014, Vol. 3, ed. by Novella di Nunzio, and Francesco Ragni. Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1978 Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1975 Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Langer, Susan K.
1957 Philosophy in a new key; a study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art (3d ed.). Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Anna. L., and Lepschy, Giulio. C.
1988 The Italian language today. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Maeder, Costantino
2018  La violenza nella letteratura italiana: problemi di definizione, problemi di percezione . In Linguaggi e paradigmi di violenza, memoria culturale e transculturalità: il caso italiano (1990–2015), ed. by Dagmar Reichardt, Rotraud V. Kulessa, Nora Moll, and Franca Sinopoli. Frankfurt, Bern: Peter Lang, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Majello, Francesco
1828 Gramatica [sic] italiana dei fanciulli. Napoli: Brescia e co.Google Scholar
Mazzeo, Michele
2007 Vangelo e Lettere di Giovanni. Introduzione, esegesi e teologia. Alba: Paoline.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2012 “Rethinking Politeness, Impoliteness and Gender Identity”. In Discourse Analysis and Gender Identity, ed. by Lia Litosellitti. and Jane Sunderland, 69–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera
2002 “Lei non sa chi sono io!”: potere, solidarietà, rispetto e distanza nella comunicazione. Linguistica e filologia 14: 283–302.Google Scholar
2015 “Polite Forms and Sociolinguistic Dynamics in Contacts between Varieties of Italian.” In Contatto interlinguistico fra presente e passato, ed. By Carlo Consani, 283–313. Milano: LED.Google Scholar
Mottura, Carlo, and Parato, Giovanni
1872 Cento regole di grammatica italiana con brevi nozioni e norme intorno ai principali generi di componimento ad uso delle classi elementari superiori. Torino: Paravia.Google Scholar
Niculescu, Alessandro
1974 Strutture allocutive pronominali reverenziali in italiano. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Pascale, Céline-Marie
2013 Social Inequality and The Politics of Representation. Newcastle upon Tyne: SAGE.Google Scholar
Pasquinelli, Carla, Cenci, Cristina, Manganelli, Silvia, and Guelfi, Valeria
2005 Antropologia delle mutilazioni genitali femminili. Una ricerca in Italia. Roma: AIDOS.Google Scholar
Perrot, Michelle
2009 Donne e uomini di fronte al potere. Bari: Gius.Laterza and Figli Spa.Google Scholar
Peruzzi, Emilio
1963 Problemi di grammatica italiana. Torino: ERI.Google Scholar
Pola, Paolo
1829 Francesa da Rimini. Venezia: Casali.Google Scholar
Pierangeli, Fabio and Barbaro, Patrizio
1995 Pier Paolo Pasolini: biografia per immagini. Cavallermaggiore: Gribaudo.Google Scholar
Rebelos, Margareta, and Strambi, Antonella
2009 “Address Pronouns in Italian CMC Exchanges: A ‘Good Example’ for L2 Learners?” Italica 86 (1): 59–79.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, Lara Gocchin
2009 “Una storia approfondita: Le lettere di Maria Messina ad Alessio Di Giovanni ed Enrico Bemporad, 1910 - 1940”. Italica, 86(3), 339-391.Google Scholar
Scaglia, Claudia
2003 “Deissi e cortesia in italiano”. Linguistica e filologia 16: 109–145.Google Scholar
Serianni, Luca, and Castelvecchi, Alberto
1989 Grammatica italiana: italiano comune e lingua letteraria, suoni, forme, costrutti. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Signorini, Andrea
July 24, 2017 Elementi di grammatica del dialetto lizzanese. Retrieved March 22 from [URL]Google Scholar
Soave, Francesco
1810 Gramatica ragionata della lingua italiana. Venezia: Santini.Google Scholar
Spina, Stefania
2014 “Il Perugia Corpus: una risorsa di riferimento per l’italiano. Composizione, annotazione e valutazione.” In Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2014, Vol. 1, ed. by In Roberto Basili, Alessandro Lenci, and Bernardo Magnini, 354–359. Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter
2002 Sociolinguistics: a resource book for students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tacchi, Francesca
(2000) Storia illustrata del fascismo. Firenze: Giunti.Google Scholar
Telmon, Tullio
1993 “Varietà regionali.” In Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo, ed. by A. Sobrero, 93–149. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
1994 “Gli italiani regionali contemporanei.” In Storia della lingua italiana. Vol. 3, ed. by Luca Serianni and Pietro Trifone, 597–626. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Tosi, Arturo
2001 Language and society in a changing Italy. Clevedon; Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1972 “Sex, Covert Prestige and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich.” Language and Society 1(2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urech, Giacomo
1995 “Contributo alla conoscenza dei dialetti della Val Calanca. 5a parte.” Quaderni grigionitaliani 64 (2): 185–200.Google Scholar
Vasta, Giorgio
2010 Spaesamento. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Vincenti, Fiora
(1974) Lalla Romano. Firenze: La nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Vizmuller-Zocco, Jana
1999 “Il sostrato dialettale nella deriva dell’italiano neo-standard.” Italica, 76 (4), 469–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volpato, Chiara
2013 Psicosociologia del maschilismo. Roma, Bari:Laterza.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
1993 Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zendralli, Arnoldo Marcelliano
1952–1953 “Il dialetto di Roveredo di Mesolcina.” Quaderni grigionitaliani 22 (1): 190–200.Google Scholar
Zeno, Apostolo
1701 Griselda. Venezia: Nicolini.Google Scholar