Cover not available
Part of
Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse
Edited by Óscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal and Adriana Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 305] 2019
► pp. 195–228

Chapter 7
Processing patterns of focusing in Spanish

| Heidelberg University
| Heidelberg University

Different kinds of focusing relations that encode different assumptions are expected to exhibit different kinds of processing patterns (Loureda et al. 2015; Lowder and Gordon 2015; Nadal et al. 2016). In this paper, we present findings of an eye tracking study that takes under consideration two different types of focusing relations in pragmatic scales in Spanish (Rooth 1985; König 1991; Rooth 1992; Kenesei 2006; Portolés 2007, 2009): (a1) unmarked identificational foci that have primarily identificational value, (a2) unmarked restrictive foci that present a conceptual restriction, and (b) contrastive foci, marked by the focus operator incluso (‘even’) that due to its procedural meaning restricts the inferential processes in communication (Karttunen and Peters 1979; Blakemore 1987, 1992; Portolés 2007). According to the findings, this paper claims that (1) utterances with unmarked and marked focus do not present different global processing efforts (utterances with marked focus have more encoded information but the focus operator generates a control and acceleration effect), (2) utterances with unmarked and marked foci present different intern processing patterns: unmarked (conceptual) and marked (procedural) patterns and (3) that different processing patterns lead to different inferential processes.

Keywords: focusing patterns, unmarked focus, marked focus, procedural meaning, focus operator, incluso , experimental pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Different kinds of focusing
  • 2.Experimental design
    • 2.1Independent variables, areas of interest and hypotheses
    • 2.2Dependent variables
    • 2.3Participants, apparatus and procedure
    • 2.4Stimuli
    • 2.5Statistical treatment
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Global comparison
    • 3.2Comparison of focusing areas
    • 3.3The comprehension of the contrastive implicatures of unmarked and marked focus structures
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 6 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.305.07cru
References
Almela, Ramón, Pascual Cantos, Álvaro Sanchez, Ramón Sarmiento, and Moisés Almela
2005 Frecuencias del español. Diccionario y estudios léxicos y morfológicos. Madrid: Universitas.Google Scholar
Andorno, Cecilia
2000 Focalizzatori fra connessione e messa a fuoco: il punto di vista delle varietà di apprendimento. Milano: Francoangeli.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David, and Brady Clark
2008 Sense and Sensitivity. How Focus Determines Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1992 Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1997 “Non-truth conditional meaning.” Linguistische Berichte 8: 92–102.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio, Salvador Pons, and José Portolés
dirs. Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español (DPDE) Accessed October 15th, 2018 online [URL]
Carston, Robyn
2002 “Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics.” Mind & Language 17 (1–2): 127–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
2016 “The heterogeneity of procedural meaning.” Lingua 175: 154–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
2007 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clifton, Charles, Adrian Staub, and Keith Rayner
2007 “Eye movements in reading words and sentences.” In Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, ed. by Roger P. G. van Gompel, Martin H. Fischer, Wayne S. Murray, and Robin L. Hill. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruz, Adriana
Focus particles and information structure in Spanish: an experimental study on cognitive processes of pragmatic scales.” Ongoing PhD diss., University of Heidelberg.
Dik, Simon C.
1989 The Theory of Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
1998 “Identificational focus versus information focus.” Language: 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell Vidal, María Victoria
2004 Fundamentos de semántica composicional. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Escandell Vidal, María Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
1997 “Categorías funcionales y semántica procedimental.” In Actas del Congreso Internacional de Gramática, Universidad de la Laguna, 363–378. Madrid: Ed. Clásicas.Google Scholar
2009 “La expresión del verum focus en español.” Español Actual 92: 11–46.Google Scholar
2011 “On the rigidity of procedural meaning.” In Procedural Meaning, ed. by María Victoria Escandell Vidal, and Manuel Leonetti, 81–102. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Fahrmeier, Ludwig, Thomas Kneib, Stefan Lang, and Brian Marx
2013 Regression. Models, Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Flórez, Óscar
1995 “La posición del adjetivo: una perspectiva pragmática.” Dicenda: Cuadernos de filología hispánica 13: 163–174.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th.
2008 Statistik für Sprachwissenschaftler. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette
1999 “On different kind of focus.” In Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, ed. by Peter Bosch, and Rob van der Sandt, 293–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, and Thorstein Fretheim
2004 “Topic and focus.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence Horn, and Gregory Ward, 175–197. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador
2000 [1997] Temas, remas, focos, tópicos y comentarios. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilmann
1988 “Verum focus.” Sprache und Pragmatik 5: 1–7.Google Scholar
Holm, Sture
1979 “A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (2): 65–70.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Kenneth, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka, and Joost Van de Weijer
2011 Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyönä, Jukka, Robert F. Lorch, and Johanna Kaakinen
2002 “Individual Differences in Reading to Summarize Expository Text: Evidence From Eye Fixations Patterns.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (1): 44–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyönä, Jukka, Robert F. Lorch, and Mike Rinck
2003 “Eye movement measures to study global text processing.” In The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, ed. by Ralph Radach, Jukka Hyönä, Heiner Deubel, 313–334. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1983 Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Vol. 138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, Marcel, Patricia Carpenter, and Jacqueline Woolley
1982 “Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.” Journal of experimental psychology: General 111 (2): 228–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri, and Stanley Peters
1979 “Conventional implicatures.” In Syntax and Semantics II, Presupposition, ed. by Choon-Kyu Oh, and David A. Dinneen, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Gregory D.
2014 “Eye-Tracking with Text.” In Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics, ed. by Jill Jegerski, and Bill VanPatten, 69–92. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keating, Gregory D., and Jill Jegerski
2014 “Experimental Designs in Sentence Processing Research. A Methodological Review and User’s Guide.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition: 1–32.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István
1984 “On what really figures in a nonconfigurational language.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 24: 28–54.Google Scholar
1986 “On the logic of word order in Hungarian.” In Topic, Focus, and Configurationality, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Sjaak de Mey, 143–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Focus as Identification.” In The Architecture of Focus, ed. by Valéria Molnár, and Susanne Winkler, 137–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991 The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008 “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred, and Renate Musan
2012 “Information Structure: Overview and Linguistic Issues.” In The Expression of Information Structure, ed. by Manfred Krifka, and Renate Musan, 1–44. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel, and María Victoria Escandell Vidal
2004 “Semántica conceptual / Semántica procedimental.” In Actas del V Congreso de Lingüística General, vol. II, ed. by Milka Villayandre Llamazares, 1727–1738. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, Adriana Cruz, and DPKog
2013 “Aproximación experimental sobre los costes de procesamiento de las partículas focales del español también e incluso .” Cuadernos AISPI. Estudios de lenguas y literaturas ibéricas e iberoamericanas, AISPI (Associazione Ispanisti Italiani): 75–98.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, Adriana Cruz, Inés Recio, and Cristina Villalba
2014 “ Incluso en posición pre- y postfocal: un análisis experimental de los costes de procesamiento de escalas pragmáticas.” Revista Española de Lingüística 44(2): 95–130.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, Adriana Cruz, Martha Rudka, Laura Nadal, Inés Recio, and Margarita Borreguero Zuloaga
2015 “Focus Particles in Information Processing: An Experimental Study on Pragmatic Scales with Spanisch incluso .” Focus particles in the Romance and Germanic languages. Experimental and corpus-based approaches, Linguistik online 71 (2):129–151.Google Scholar
Lowder, Matthew W., and Peter C. Gordon
2015 “Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22: 1733–1738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mata, André, Elise J. Percy, and Steven J. Sherman
2014 “Adjective-noun order as representational structure: Native-language grammar influences perception of similarity and recognition memory.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21: 193–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murillo, Silvia
2010 “Los marcadores del discurso y su semántica.” In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 241–280. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Nadal, Laura, Adriana Cruz, Inés Recio, and Óscar Loureda
2016 “El significado procedimental y las partículas discursivas del español: una aproximación experimental.” Revista Signos 49 (1) (4–6): 52–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Kevin B., Simon P. Liversedge, Ruth Filik, Barbara Juhasz, Sarah White, and Keith Rayner
2007 “Focus identification during sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements.” The Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (10): 1423–1445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., Matthew J. Traxler, and Matthew J. Crocker
2000 “Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts.” Journal of Memory and Language 43 (3): 447–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portolés, José
2001 [1998] Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
2007 “Escalas informativas aditivas: pruebas del español.” Spanish in Context 4 (2): 135–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Los marcadores del discurso y la estructura informativa.” In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda and Esperanza Acín, 281–326. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2014 “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Raposo, Ana, Mafalda Mendes, and J. Frederico Marques
2012 “The Hierarchical Organization of Semantic Memory: Executive Function in the Processing of Superordinate Concepts.” Neuroimage 59: 1870–1878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, Keith
1998 “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124 (3): 372–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Eye Movements and Attention in Reading, Scene Perception, and Visual Search.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (8): 1457–1506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, Keith, Alexander Pollatsek, Jane Ashby, and Charles Clifton
2012 Psychology of Reading. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith, and Sara Sereno
1994 “Eye movements in Reading: Psycholinguistic Studies.” In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. by Morton Ann Gernsbacher, 57–81. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reichle, Erik, Keith Rayner, and Alexander Pollatsek
2003 “The E-Z Reader Model of Eye-movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to Other Models.” Behavioral and Brain Science 26 (4): 445–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Daniel, Rick Dale, and Michael Spivey
2007 “Eye Movements in Language and Cognition.” Methods in Cognitive Linguistics 18, 323–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John T. E.
1978 “Word Order and Imagery in the Recall of Adjective-noun Phrases.” International Journal of Psychology 13(3): 179–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1998 “Focus, the Flow of Information and Universal Grammar.” In Syntax and Semantics: the Limits of Syntax, ed. by Peter Culicover, and Louise McNally, 109–160. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2012 “Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics.” Semantics and Pragmatics 5(6): 1–69.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael S.
1986 Focus in Generative Grammar. Vol. 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985 Association with Focus. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
1992 “A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 “Focus.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, ed. by Shalom Lappin, 271–297. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973 “Natural Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, and Barbara Lloyd
1978 Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek
2009 “Experimentation.” In Cognition and Pragmatics, ed. by Dominiek Sandra, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 288–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, Rahel, Miranka Wirth, Walter J. Perrig, Werner Strik, and Thomas König
2009 “ERP Correlates of Superordinate Category Activation.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 72: 134–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
2002 “Additive Particles and Scalar Endpoint Marking.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16: 119–134.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1984 Phonology and Syntax. Massachussetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1985 “Intonation, Stress and Meaning.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11: 491–504.Google Scholar
2007 “Contrastive Focus, Givenness and the Unmarked Status of Discourse-New.” Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Strucutre 6: 125–145.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Kuppevelt, Jan
1996 “Inferring from Topics.” Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (4): 393–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasishth, Shravan, Daniela Mertzen, Lena A. Jäger, and Andrew Gelman
2018 “The Statistical Significance Filter Leads to Overoptimistic Expectations of Replicability.” Journal of Memory and Language 103: 151–175.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María L.
1999 “Las funciones informativas: tema y foco.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 4215–4244. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar