Chapter 2
At the frontlines of the online scientific article
Inaugurated in 1665, the scientific journal article slowly evolved an elaborate set of discourse norms related to style, presentation features like references and figures, and argument. With the recent “webification” of the scientific literature, these norms have remained in place while the digital opportunities afforded by webification have supplemented and enhanced some of them. Leading the way on these fronts has been a set of digital-only scientific journals published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) – founded in 2000 and now one of the major digital innovators in scientific publishing. This chapter focuses on the substantive changes PLOS and a few other publishers have brought to the genre of both the scientific article and journal, and speculates on what additional changes in the genre might be expected in the coming decades.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Origin and evolution of the print scientific article
- 3.Current state of the digital scientific article
- 4.Future of the digital scientific article
- 4.1State-of-the-art PLOS article
- 4.1.1Front matter
- 4.1.2Main text
- 4.1.3Supporting information
- 4.2Enhanced PLOS articles
- 5.Other innovations possible for the future scientific article
- 6.Concluding remarks
-
References
References
Aalbersberg, IJsbrand J., Sophia Atzeni, Hylke Koers, Beate Specker, and Elena Zudilova-Seinstra
2014 “
Bringing Digital Science Deep Inside the Scientific Article: the Elsevier Article of the Future Project.”
LIBER Quarterly 23(4): 274–299.
Atkinson, Dwight
1999 Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1675 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Banks, David
2008 The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context. Oakville, CT: Equinox Publishing.
Barber, Charles
1962 “
Some Measurable Characteristics of Modern Scientific Prose.” In
Contributions to English Syntax and Philology, ed. by
John Swales, 1–23. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
Bazerman, Charles
1988 Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Beal, Jeffrey
2018 “
Beal’s List of Predatory Journals and Publishers.” Last accessed July 4, 2018.
[URL]
Biber, Douglas, and James K. Jones
2005 “
Merging Corpus Linguistic and Discourse Analytic Research Goals: Discourse Units in Biology Research Articles.”
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1–2: 151–182.
Buehl, Jonathan
2016 “
Revolution or Evolution? Casing the Impact of Digital Media on the Rhetoric of Science.” In
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by
Alan G. Gross and
Jonathan Buehl, 1–9. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Casper, Christian F.
2016 “
The Online Research Article and the Ecological Basis of New Digital Genres.” In
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by
Alan G. Gross and
Jonathan Buehl, 77–98. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Fahnestock, Jeanne
2016 “
Controversies on the Web: The Case of Adult Human Neurogenesis.” In
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by
Alan G. Gross and
Jonathan Buehl, 117–141. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Giltrow, Janet
2011 “
‘Curious Gentlemen’: The Hudson’s Bay Company and the Royal Society, Business and Science in the Eighteen Century.” In
Writing in Knowledge Societies, ed. by
Doreen Starke-Meyerring,
Anthony Paré,
Natasha Artemeva,
Miriam Horne, and
Larissa Yousoubova, 53–74. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.
Giltrow, Janet, and Dieter Stein
Gross, Alan
2016 “
Revolution or Evolution? Casing the Impact of Digital Media on the Rhetoric of Science.” In
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by
Alan G. Gross and
Jonathan Buehl, 59–76. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing..
Gross, Alan G., and Joseph E. Harmon
2013 Science from Sight to Insight: How Scientists Illustrate Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gross, Alan G., and Joseph E. Harmon
2016 The Internet Revolution in the Sciences and Humanities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gross, Alan G., Joseph E. Harmon, and Michael Reidy
2002 Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gross, Alan G., and Jonathan Buehl
(eds.) 2016 Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Harmon, Joseph
2016 “
The Scientific Journal: Making it New?” In
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by
Alan G. Gross, and
Jonathan Buehl, 33–58. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Hobaiter, Catherine, Timothée Poisot, Klaus Zuberbühler, William Hoppitt, and Thibaud Gruber
2014 “
Social Network Analysis Shows Direct Evidence for Social Transmission of Tool Use in Wild Chimpanzees.”
PLOS Biology 12(9): e1001960.
Jones, Benjamin F., Stefan Wuchty, and Brian Uzzi
2008 “
Multi-university Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science.”
Science 322: 1259–1262.
Karlberg, Tobias, Susanne van den Berg, Martin Hammarström, Johanna Sagemark, Ida Johansson, Lovisa Holmberg-Schiavone, and Herwig Schüler
2009 “
Crystal Structure of the ATPase Domain of the Human AAA+ Protein Paraplegin/SPG7.”
PLOS One 4(10): e6975.
. See also video at
[URL]
Klinkhamer, Ada J., D. Ray Wilhite, Matt A. White, and Stephen Wroe
2017 “
Digital Dissection and Three-Dimensional Interactive Models of Limb Musculature in the Australian Estuarine Crocodile (Crocodylus porosus).”
PLOS One 12(4): e0175079.
Mehlenbacher, Ashley R.
2019 “
Registered Reports: Genre Evolution and the Research Article.”
Written Communication 36 (1): 38–67.
Miller, Carolyn R.
1984 “
Genre as Social Action.”
Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
Owen, John M.
2007 The Scientific Article in the Age of Digitization. The Netherlands: Springer.
Reis, Renato B., Guilherme S. Ribeiro, Ridalva D. M. Felzemburgh, Francisco S. Santana, Sharif Mohr, Astrid X. T. O. Melendez, Adriano Queiroz, Andréia C. Santos, Romy R. Ravines, Wagner S. Tassinari, Marília S. Carvalho, Mitermayer G. Reis, and Albert I. Ko
2008 “
Impact of Environment and Social Gradient on Leptospira Infection in Urban Slums.”
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2(4): e228.
Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer
1985 Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shotton, David, Katie Portwin, Graham Klyne, and Alistair Miles
2009 “
Adventures in Semantic Publishing: Exemplar Semantic Enhancements of a Research Article.”
PLOS Computational Biology 5(4): e1000361.
Sidler, Michelle
2016 “
The Chemistry Liveblogging Event: The Web Refigures Peer Review.” In
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by
Alan G. Gross, and
Jonathan Buehl, 99–116. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Swales, John M.
1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weinberger, David
2012 Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren’t the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room. New York: Basic Books.
Wickman, Chad
2016 “
Learning to “Share your Science”: The Open Notebook as Textual Object and Dynamic Rhetorical Space.” In
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by
Alan G. Gross, and
Jonathan Buehl, 11–22. London: Routledge.
Wuchty, Stefan, Benjamins F. Jones, and Brian Uzzi
2007 “
The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.”
Science 316: 1036–1039.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Herman, Eti, John Akeroyd, Gaelle Bequet, David Nicholas & Anthony Watkinson
2020.
The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models.
Learned Publishing 33:3
► pp. 213 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.