This study investigates a recent web-enabled feature, the use of brief audio/video recordings for the communication of scientific research findings to a non-specialized audience, and discusses the implications of these “scholarly soundbites” for genre evolution in the digital environment and for the mediatization of science. We focus on four types of audiovisual material, all characterized by their brevity: Three-Minute Thesis presentations, author videos, and podcasts on a popular science and a research journal website. An analysis of the moves and of the recontextualization strategies used to manage the knowledge asymmetry between scientists and audience highlights differences between the four types of soundbites as well as with the corresponding written genres (research articles, PhD dissertations).
Bhatia, Vijay K.2005. “Generic Patterns in Promotional Discourse.” In Persuasion across Genres: A Linguistic Approach, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 213–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Campagna, Sandra, Giuliana Garzone, Cornelia Ilie, and Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet (eds). 2012. Evolving Genres in Web-mediated Communication. Bern: Peter Lang.
Carter-Thomas, Shirley, and Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet. 2017. “Open Science Notebooks: New Insights, New Affordances.” Journal of Pragmatics 116: 64–76.
Ciapuscio, Guiomar E.2003. “Formulation and Reformulation Procedures in Verbal Interactions between Experts and (semi-)Laypersons.” Discourse Studies 5: 207–233.
Cislaru, Georgeta. 2015. “Emotions in Tweets: From Instantaneity to Preconstruction.” Social Science Information 54(4): 455–469.
Garland, Ruth, Damian Tambini, and Nick Couldry. 2018. “Has Government been Mediatized? A UK Perspective.” Media, Culture & Society 40(4): 496–513.
Gilbert, G. Nigel, and Michael Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. London: Cambridge University Press.
Gülich, Elisabeth. 2003. “Conversational Techniques Used in Transferring Knowledge between Medical Experts and Non-experts.” Discourse Studies 5: 235–263.
Hammarfelt, Björn, Sarah de Rijcke, and Alexander D. Rushforth. 2016. “Quantified Academic Selves: The Gamification of Science through Social Networking Services.” Information Research 21(2): eSM1.
Herring, Susan, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen (eds). 2013. Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hu, Guangwei, and Yanhua Liu. 2018. “Three Minute Thesis Presentations as an Academic Genre: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Genre Moves.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 35: 16–30.
Jacobi, Daniel. 1999. La communication scientifique: Discours, figures, modèles. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D.[1981] 2013. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Myers, Greg. 2003. “Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries.” Discourse Studies 5: 265–279.
Myers, Greg. 2010. The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.
Pallas, Josef, and Linda Wedlin. 2013. “Governance of Science in Mediatized Society: Media Rankings and the Translation of Global Governance Models for Universities.” In Global Themes and Local Variations in Organization and Management: Perspectives on Glocalization, ed. by Gili S. Drori, Markus H. Llerer, and Peter Walgenbach, 295–308. New York: Routledge.
Pennec, Blandine. 2006. La reformulation en anglais contemporain: indices linguistiques et constructions discursives. PhD Dissertation, Université Rennes 2.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2013. “The Article of the Future: Strategies for Genre Stability and Change.” English for Specific Purposes 32: 221–235.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2016. “How Is the Digital Medium Shaping Research Genres? Some Cross-disciplinary Trends.” ESP Today 4 (1): 22–42.
Rödder, Simone, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2010. “Repercussion and Resistance. An Empirical Study on the Interrelation between Science and Mass Media.” Communications 35 (3): 249–267.
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth, and Shirley Carter-Thomas. 2016. “La vraie histoire de la recherche expérimentale? Comparaison entre la narration de la recherche dans les cahiers de laboratoire et dans les articles de recherche.” In La mise en récit dans les discours spécialisés, ed. by Catherine Resche, 97–120. Bern: Peter Lang.
Swales, John M.1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, John M.2004. Research Genres. Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Susan. 1998. “Why Ask Questions in Monologue? Language Choice at Work in Scientific and Linguistic Talk.” Language at Work 13: 137–150.
Ventola, Eija, Celia Shalom, and Susan Thompson (eds.). 2002. The Language of Conferencing. Bern: Peter Lang.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Hafner, Christoph A., Sylvia Jaworska & Tongle Sun
2024. Disciplinary tribes and the discourse of mainstream media expert opinion articles: evidencing COVID-19 knowledge claims for a public audience. Applied Linguistics Review
Sanchez, Ana & António Granado
2024. Telling Science/Health Stories in Audio. In Palgrave Handbook of Science and Health Journalism, ► pp. 197 ff.
Beltrán-Palanques, Vicent
2023. Three-Minute Thesis Presentations: Engaging the Audience Through Multimodal Resources. In Digital Scientific Communication, ► pp. 223 ff.
Bernad-Mechó, Edgar & Carolina Girón-García
2023. multimodal analysis of humour as an engagement strategy in YouTube research dissemination videos. The European Journal of Humour Research 11:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
Falconer, Matthew A.
2023. Transforming Data on the Boundaries of Science and Policy: The Council of Canadian Academies’ Rhetorical Repertoire. In Applied Data Science [Studies in Big Data, 125], ► pp. 147 ff.
Humbley, John
2023. Domenec, Fanny and Resche, Catherine, eds. (2020): Stratégies et techniques rhétoriques dans les discours spécialisés. Berlin/Bern: Peter Lang, 248 p.. Meta 67:3 ► pp. 692 ff.
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A.
2023. A Missing Link?. In Translaboration in Analogue and Digital Practice [Transkulturalität – Translation – Transfer, 57], ► pp. 25 ff.
Palmer-Silveira, Juan C. & Miguel F. Ruiz-Garrido
2023. Introducing Science to the Public in 3-Minute Talks: Verbal and Non-verbal Engagement Strategies. In Digital Scientific Communication, ► pp. 251 ff.
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth & Shirley Carter-Thomas
2023. Research Visibility and Speaker Ethos: A Comparative Study of Researcher Identity in 3MT Presentations and Research Group Videos. In Digital Scientific Communication, ► pp. 279 ff.
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth & Shirley Carter-Thomas
2023. Research goes digital: A challenge for genre analysis?. ASp 84 ► pp. 15 ff.
Ruiz-Madrid, Noelia & Julia Valeiras-Jurado
2023. Reconceptualisation of Genre(s) in Scholarly and Scientific Digital Practices: A Look at Multimodal Online Genres for the Dissemination of Science. In Digital Scientific Communication, ► pp. 193 ff.
(Kevin) Jiang, Feng & Xuyan Qiu
2022. Communicating disciplinary knowledge to a wide audience in 3MT presentations: How students engage with popularization of science. Discourse Studies 24:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2022. Online Data Articles: The Language of Intersubjective Stance in a Rhetorical Hybrid. Written Communication 39:3 ► pp. 400 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.