Part of
Science Communication on the Internet: Old genres meet new genres
Edited by María José Luzón and Carmen Pérez-Llantada
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 308] 2019
► pp. 173194
References (25)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Anthony, Laurence, and Claire Hardaker. 2017. FireAnt (Version 1.1.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büchi, Moritz. 2016. “Microblogging as an Extension of Science Reporting.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (8): 953–968. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, Giuditta. 2014. “The Popularization of Science in Web-based Genres.” In The Language of Popularization: Theoretical and Descriptive Models, ed. by Giancarmine Bongo, and Giuditta Caliendo, 101–132. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, Helena, and Teun van Dijk. 2004. “Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome.” Discourse and Society 15 (4): 369–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ECDC. (2005–2019). Copyright and Limited Reproduction Notices. Retrieved 7 June 2019. [URL]
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1986. “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.” Written Communication 3 (3): 275–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2011. Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science.” English for Academic Purposes 9 (2): 116–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, Dawn. 2015. “e-Language: Communication in the Digital Age.” In Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, ed. by Paul Baker, and Tony McEnery, 20–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramarz, Piotr, Pierluigi Lopalco, Emma Huitric, and Lucia Pastore-Celentano. 2014. “Vaccine-preventable Diseases: The Role of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20 (s5): 2–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luzón, María-José. 2013. “Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience.” Written Communication 30 (4): 428–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machin, David. 2007. Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Maci, Stefania. 2014. “Institutional Popularization of Medical Knowledge: The Case of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1).” In The Language of Popularization: Theoretical and Descriptive Models, ed. by Giancarmine Bongo, and Giuditta Caliendo, 165–189. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miller, Thomas. 1998. “Visual Persuasion: A Comparison of Visuals in Academic Texts and the Popular Press.” English for Specific Purposes 17 (1): 29–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puschmann, Cornelius. 2014. “(Micro)blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communication.” In Opening Science, ed. by Sascha Friesike, and Sönke Bartling, 89–106. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scotto di Carlo, Giuseppina. 2014. “The Role of Proximity in Online Popularizations: The Case of TED Talks.” Discourse Studies 16 (5): 591–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shan, Liran, Áine Regan, Aoife De Brún, Julie Barnett, Maarten C. A. van der Sanden, Patrick Wall, and Áine McConnon. 2013. “Food Crisis Coverage by Social and Traditional Media: A Case Study of the 2008 Irish Dioxin Crisis.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (8): 911–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titak, Ashley, and Audrey Roberson. 2013. “Dimensions of Web Registers: An Exploratory Multi-dimensional Comparison.” Corpora 8 (2): 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veltri, Giuseppe A., and Dimitrinka Atanasova. 2015. “Climate Change on Twitter: Content, Media Ecology and Information Sharing Behaviour.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (6): 721–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Falconer, Matthew
2024. The Discursive Boundary Work of Recontextualizing Science for Policy: Opening the Black Box of an Organization’s Genre System and Intermediary Genre Sets. Written Communication 41:3  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Villares, Rosana
2024. Twitter conference discussion sessions: How and why researchers engage in online discussions. Research in Corpus Linguistics 13:1  pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Bocanegra-Valle, Ana
2023. Engaging in predatory practices: How editors persuade prospective authors. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2023. ‘Help us better understand our changing climate’: Exploring the discourse of Citizen Science. Discourse & Communication  pp. 175048132311589 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2024. Identity construction in digital communication for public engagement in science. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Scales, David, Lindsay Hurth, Wenna Xi, Sara Gorman, Malavika Radhakrishnan, Savannah Windham, Azubuike Akunne, Julia Florman, Lindsey Leininger & Jack Gorman
2023. Addressing Antivaccine Sentiment on Public Social Media Forums Through Web-Based Conversations Based on Motivational Interviewing Techniques: Observational Study. JMIR Infodemiology 3  pp. e50138 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.