Part of
Science Communication on the Internet: Old genres meet new genres
Edited by María José Luzón and Carmen Pérez-Llantada
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 308] 2019
► pp. 195218
References (39)
References
Aristotle. 1960. The Rhetoric of Aristotle. (L. Cooper, trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Austriaco, Nicanor P. G. 2015. “The Relationship between Science and Religion according to ‘Laudato Si’.” BioLogos. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Bauer, Martin W., and George Gaskell. 1999. “Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations.” Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (2): 163–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 1994. “Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. by Aviva Freedman, and Peter Medway, 79–101. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2016. “Genre as Interdiscursive Performance in Public Space.” In Genre and the Performance of Publics, ed. by Mary Jo Reiff, and Anis Bawarshi, 25–42. Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1988. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crowston, Kevin, and Marie Williams. 2000. “Reproduced and Emergent Genres of Communication on the World Wide Web.” Information Society 16 (3): 201–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Amy. 1991. “Intertextuality in Tax Accounting: Generic, Referential, and Functional.” In Textual Dynamics for the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, ed. by Charles Bazerman, and James Paradis, 335–57. Madison, WN: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Freadman, Anne. 2002. “Uptake.” In The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre, ed. by Richard Coe, Lorelei Lingard, and Tatiana Teslenko, 39–5. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Scott, and Brandon Whelan. 2008. “Mode, Medium, and Genre: A Case Study of Decisions in New-media Design.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22 (1): 65–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grim, John. 2015. “President’s Corner.” Teilhard Perspective 48 (1): 1–5. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Hajer, Marteen. 2006. “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” In Words Matter in Policy and Planning, ed. by Margo van den Brink, and Tamara Metze, 65–74. Utretch, The Netherlands: Kovvinkliijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Culture Representation and Signifying Practices. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. 2013. “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured and Emergent.” In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Trester, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene, and Patricia Leavy. 2008. Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hulme, Mike. 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen M. 1975. “Antecedent Genre as Rhetorical Constraint.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 61: 406–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. “Discourse across Boundaries: On Recontextualizations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse.” Texts 18 (2): 143–157.Google Scholar
Luzón, María-José. 2013. “Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience.” Written Communication 30 (4): 428–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehlenbacher, Ashley R. 2019. “Registered Reports: Genre Evolution and the Research Article.” Written Communication 36 (1): 38–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Genre Innovation: Evolution, Emergence, or Something Else?The Journal of Media Innovations 3 (2): 4–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, Serge. 1963. “Attitudes and Opinions.” Annual Review of Psychology 14: 231–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosher, Steven. 2015. “Do the Pope and I Live on the Same Planet?New York Post. July 05. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Potter, John. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London, UK: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smart, Graham. 2011. “Argumentation across Web-based Organizational Discourses: The Case of Climate Change.” In Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Christopher Candlin, 363–386. Berlin, DE: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smart, Graham, and Matthew Falconer. forthcoming. “The Uptake and Recontextualization of Climate-change Science within ‘Denialist’ Cultural Communities.” In Genres of the Climate Debate, ed. by Christel Sunesen, H. Bildsøe, and Sune Auken. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
The Catholic Encyclopaedia, 2017. “Encyclicals.” N.p.n. Nashville: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Appendix: Corpus of analysis
Pope Benedict XVI. 2006, November 06. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
. 2010, October 28. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
. 2012, November 08. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Pope Francis. 2015. Laudato Si’, on Care for our Common Home. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor.Google Scholar
Pope John Paul II. 1979, November 10. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
. 1990, October 29. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
. 1992, October 31. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Pope Paul VI. 1964, October 03. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
. 1966, April 23. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Falconer, Matthew
2024. The Discursive Boundary Work of Recontextualizing Science for Policy: Opening the Black Box of an Organization’s Genre System and Intermediary Genre Sets. Written Communication 41:3  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Falconer, Matthew A.
2023. Transforming Data on the Boundaries of Science and Policy: The Council of Canadian Academies’ Rhetorical Repertoire. In Applied Data Science [Studies in Big Data, 125],  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.