Cover not available
Part of
Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and linguistic approaches
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 312] 2020
► pp. 1–23

Manners, norms and transgressions

Introduction

| University of Helsinki
| University of Zurich
In this volume we focus on different types of manners, norms and their transgressions. One kind of transgression can be called “blunders” and deals with violations of accepted behaviour, conduct or manners. A second kind draws more attention to language use in interpersonal communication with violations of pragmatic principles or breaking the norms of appropriate writing styles. In this introduction, we first outline the change in the appropriation of manners in different periods discussed in this book. We then proceed to the theoretical background and suggest an overall line of diachronic changes. Our approach falls at the interface between language and literature, which is discussed before the chapter summaries.
Keywords: manners, norms, transgressions, politeness, history of politeness, language history, diachrony
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Three waves of politeness theory
  • 3.The diachrony of manners and politeness
  • 4.Norms, blunders and transgressions
  • 5.Literary and linguistic approaches to data analysis
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Primary sources
  • Corpora and dictionaries
  • References
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.312.01taa
References (45)
Primary sources
Bennett, John. 1792. Letters to a young lady, on a variety of useful and interesting subjects. Calculated to improve the heart, to form the manners, and enlighten the understanding, 2nd ed., vol. 2. Printed by Hudson and Goodwin. Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO). [URL]Google Scholar
Benson, Larry D. (ed.). 1987. The Riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. See also. [URL].Google Scholar
Furnivall, Frederick J. 1969. The Babees Book. Early English Text Society O.S. 32. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Judith. 1996. Miss Manners Rescues Civilization: From Sexual Harassment, Frivolous Lawsuits, Dissing and Other Lapses in Civility. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Corpora and dictionaries
Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (CLMET3.0). [URL].
Early English Books Online (EEBO). [URL].
Helsinki Corpus. [URL].
Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary. [URL].
Oxford English Dictionary. [URL].
References
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bös, Birte, and Claudia Claridge. 2019. “Linguistic Norms and Conventions: Past and Present.” In Norms and Conventions in the History of English, ed. by Birte Bös, and Claudia Claridge, 1–6. Amsterdam:John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1989. “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies.” Language in Society 18 (2): 159–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “The Influence of Italian Manners on Politeness in England, 1550–1620.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (2): 195–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. Gisle Andersen, and Karin Aijmer2011. “Politeness and Impoliteness.” In Pragmatics of Society. Handbooks of Pragmatics 5, ed. by , 393–438. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Hardaker, Claire. 2017. “Impoliteness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Kádár, 199–225. London:Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds). 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Encounters 1. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Grainger, Karen. 2011. “‘First Order’ and ‘Second Order’ Politeness: Institutional and Intercultural Contexts.” In Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Mouton Series in Pragmatics 8, ed. by Linguistic Politeness Research Group, 167–188. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. 1979. “The Alterity and Modernity of Medieval Literature.” In New Literary History 10.2, Medieval Literature and Contemporary Theory, ed. by Hans Robert Jauss, and Timothy Bahti, 181–229.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Modernity and Literary Tradition.” Critical Inquiry 31 (2): 329–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. “‘In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’: Politeness in Middle English.” In Historical (Im)politeness. Linguistic Insights 65, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 175–200. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012. “‘These Imputations Are Too Common, Sir’: Politeness in Early Modern English Dialogues: The case of Ben Jonson’s Volpone, or The Fox ”. In Historical Perspectives on Forms of English Dialogue. Metodi e Prospettive, ed. by Gabriella Mazzon, and Luisanna Fodde, 40–58. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
2014. “Courtesy and Politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight .” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49 (3): 5–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Politeness in the History of English. From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Irma Taavitsainen, and Schneider Gerold. 2012. “Semantic Corpus Trawling: Expressions of ‘Courtesy’ and ‘Politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus .” In Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11, ed. by Carla Suhr, and Irma Taavitsainen. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Available online at. [URL].Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele. 2003. “Politeness.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–20. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, Hilary. 1998. “Adab.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature, ed. by Julie Scott Meisami, Paul Starkeyand , 54–56. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopytko, Roman. 1995. “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays.” In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 515–540. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nash, Walter. 1985. The Language of Humour: Style and Technique in Comic Discourse. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ridealgh, Kim. 2016. “Polite Like an Egyptian? Case Studies of Politeness in the Late Ramesside Letters.” Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2): 245–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert, Rik Vosters, and Wim Vandenbussche. 2014. “The Interplay of Language Norms and Usage Patterns: Comparing the History of Dutch, English, French and German.” In Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900. A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective. Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 3, ed. by Gijsbert Rutten, Rik Vosters, and Wim Vandenbussche, 1–18. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2011. “‘That’s Not Ironic, That’s Just Stupid’: Towards an Eclectic Account of the Discourse of Irony.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. “Genre Dynamics.” In Cambridge Handbook on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Merja Kytö, and Päivi Pahta, 271–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness.” In Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Language, Power and Social Process 21, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam Locher, 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011. “From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking Norms of Im/politeness Across Time and Space.” Journal of Politeness Research 7: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. “A Socio-cognitive Approach to Historical Politeness.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 104–132.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. 1992. “Introduction.” In Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werlich, Egon. 1982. A Text Grammar of English. (UTB 597) 2nd ed. (1st ed. 1974). Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jucker, Andreas H.
2024. Conduct politeness versus etiquette politeness: a terminological distinction. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Molodcha, Natalia & Asya Khilkovska
2022. Strategies of criticism and disapproval in the academic administrative discourse. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :25 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Shevchenko, Iryna, Yuliia Matiukhina & Maria Liudvika Drazdauskienė
2021. The evolution of the English small talk: a cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :23 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.