Cover not available
Part of
Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and linguistic approaches
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 312] 2020
► pp. 213–246

Impoliteness in Blunderland

Carroll’s Alice books and the manners in which manners fail

 | Universidade do Minho
Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865) and Through the Looking-Glass (1871), two linguistic treatises in disguise, create ingenious fantasy worlds where the rules of language and the conventions of communication are turned upside down. What is (semantically) illogical or (pragmatically) inappropriate confounds Alice, who struggles to make sense of nonsense and to keep the order of a polite, rational world in place. In her dialogues with anthropomorphic animals and objects, ambiguity and fallacy coexist with interactive manipulation, while her communicative expectations crumble and comic misunderstandings arise.
This article looks into the construction of linguistic and pragmatic transgressions in Carroll’s acclaimed books with a view to unveiling their contribution to impoliteness. On the one hand, the paper analyses the structural mechanisms of wordplay vis-à-vis phonetic, morpho-syntactic and lexical ambiguity. On the other, it examines the pragmatic strategies whereby speech-act infelicities, conversational maxim violations, and bald-on-record clashes contribute to reversing the established conventions of (polite) social interaction. The premise guiding the analysis is that the pervasive existence of double meaning and incongruity in the Alice books underlies not only linguistic phenomena such as punning, neologism, and relexicalisation, but also interactive patterns, in which the expected norms of courteous conduct in social exchanges do not obtain. The antithetical and script-oppositional (hence, humorous) nature of this process defrauds outsider Alice – the victim, but at times the happy recipient, of the uncooperative challenges of this inverted, refracted, teasingly nonsensical world.
Keywords: impoliteness, face, manners, incongruity, ambiguity, wordplay, infelicity, speech act, nonsense, humour
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Victorian manners
  • 3.From politeness to impoliteness
  • 4.Transgressions in Carroll’s Alice books
    • 4.1Linguistic transgressions
      • 4.1.1Punning
      • 4.1.2Neologism
      • 4.1.3Relexicalisation
    • 4.2Pragmatic transgressions
      • 4.2.1Conversational maxim violations
      • 4.2.2Infelicitous speech acts
      • 4.2.3Bald-on-record impoliteness
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.312.10erm
References (87)
Sources
Carroll, Lewis. 1855. “Stanza of Anglo-Saxon Poetry.” In Mischmasch, Facsimile edition. British Museum, 1932.Google Scholar
. 1865. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. With Forty-Two Illustrations by John Tenniel. Chicago: VolumeOne Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
. 1871. Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There. With the original illustrations by Sir John Tenniel. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1999.Google Scholar
References
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 1993. “Violation of Conversational Maxims and Cooperation: The Case of Jokes.” Journal of Pragmatics 19 (6): 537–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do Things with Words, 2nd ed. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beattie, James. 1764. “An Essay on Laughter and Ludicrous Composition.” Essays. New York: Garland Publishing, 1971.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. 2016. Alice in Space: The Sideways Victorian World of Lewis Carroll. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1900. Le Rire, Essai sur la Signification du Comique. Paris: PUF, 1978.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Politeness: Universals in Language Usage.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 56–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cashman, Holly R. 2006. “Impoliteness in Children’s Interactions in a Spanish/English Bilingual Community of Practice.” Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2): 217–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards and Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: the Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. 1649. Les Passions de l’Âme. Paris: Flammarion, 1998.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Paul. 1997. “Humpty Dumpty Meets Mikhail Bakhtin.” Journal of Pragmatics 27 (4): 527–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolitsky, Marlene. 1984. Under the Tumtum Tree: From Nonsense to Sense, A Study in Nonautomatic Comprehension. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Ermida, Isabel. 2006. “Linguistic Mechanisms of Power in Nineteen Eighty-Four: Applying Politeness Theory to Orwell’s World.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (6): 842–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The Language of Comic Narratives. Humour Construction in Short Stories. Berlin / New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Get the Snip – and a Job! Disagreement, Impoliteness, and Conflicting Identities on the Internet.” Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 6: 205–247.Google Scholar
Fischer, Roswitha. 1998. A Corpus-based Study of the Motivation, Institutionalization, and Productivity of Creative Neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “Perspectives on Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1905. Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious. English translation from the German original by James Strachey, 1976. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar
Frost, Ginger S. 2009. Victorian Childhoods. Westport / London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2013. “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: from Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 (Speech Acts), Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), 41–59. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael. 1980. “How to Play Games with Words: Speech-act Jokes.” Journal of Literary Semantics 9 (1): 20–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2013. “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Abraham. 1837. “Codes of Manners and Etiquette.” Quarterly Review 59 (October 1837): 395–439.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. London: Dent, 1973.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2005. “Politeness in Germany – Politeness in Germany?” In Politeness in Europe, ed. by Leo Hickey, and Miranda Stewart, 13–29. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Kathryn. 1993. The Victorian Governess. London and New York: Hambledon.Google Scholar
Jordan, Thomas Edward. 1987. Victorian Childhood: Themes and Variations. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Larssyn Rüegg. 2017. “(Im)politeness and Developments in Methodology.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Kádár, 403–429. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Miriam A. Locher. 2017. “Introducing Pragmatics of Fiction: Approaches, Trends and Developments.” In Pragmatics of Fiction, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Andreas H. Jucker, 1–21. Berlin/New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred, 1997. “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances.” Functions of Language 4: 251–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, 2008. “Impoliteness and emotional arguments.” Journal of Politeness Research 4 (2): 243–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Nora C. 1899. Victorian Etiquette, Manners, and Customs: Practical Etiquette of the Victorian Era. Kindle Edition, 2015.Google Scholar
Lachenicht, Lance G. 1980. “Aggravating Language: a Study of Abusive and Insulting Language.” International Journal of Human Communication 13 (4): 607–687.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “The Logic of Politeness; or Minding Your P’s and Q’s.” Chicago Linguistic Society 9: 292–305.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London / New York: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2008. “Relational Work, Politeness and Identity Construction.” In Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Vol. 2, ed. by G. Antos, E. Ventola, T. Weber, 509–540. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015. “Interpersonal Pragmatics and Its Link to (Im)politeness Research.” Journal of Pragmatics 86: 5–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Andreas Langlotz. 2008. “Relational Work: At the Intersection of Cognition, Interaction and Emotion.” Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée (VALS-ASLA) 88: 165–191.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Peter J. 1997. “Jabberwocky Back to Old English: Nonsense, Anglo-Saxon and Oxford.” In Language History and Linguistic Modelling, ed. by Raymond Hickey, and Stanislav Puppel, 503–520. Berlin and Boston: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maunder, Andrew. 2000. “‘Alone Into the Wide, Wide World’: Trollope’s Miss Mackenzie and the Mid-Victorian Etiquette Manual.” Victorian Review 26-2 (2000): 48–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, John. 1844. “The Sliding Scale of Manners.” Fraser’s Magazine 19 (1844): 580–97.Google Scholar
Montabrut, Maurice. 1994. “Courtly Manners in a Victorian Home: Patmore’s The Angel in the House.” In The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900, ed. by Jacques Carré, 145–156. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, Rosamund. 1998. Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mulken, Margot van, Renske van Enscho, Hans Hoeken. 2005. “Puns, Relevance and Appreciation in Advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 707–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, K. S. 2008. The Evolution of the Private Language Argument. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 2017. “Language Play in Conversation”. In Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, Nancy Bell (ed.), 11–46. Boston and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. [URL].
Partington, Alan. 2006. The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 1977. Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Redfern, Walter. 1984. Puns. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reichertz, Ronald. 2000. The Making of the Alice Books: Lewis Carroll’s Uses of Earlier Children’s Literature. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, David. 1978. “The Paterfamilias of the Victorian Governing Classes.” In The Victorian Family: Structures and Stresses, ed. by Anthony S. Wohl, 59–81. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Robinson-Tomsett, Emma. 2013. Women, Travel and Identity: Journeys by Rail and Sea, 1870–1940. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sala, G.A. 1864. “Manners to Mend.” Temple Bar 12 (August 1864): 91–97.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Course in General Linguistics, ed. by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Translated from French by Wade Baskin. New York/Toronto/London: McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1818. The World as Will and Representation. New York: Dover Publications. Trans. E.F.J. Payne. Rev. edn. 1966.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Scollon, Suzanne W. 2001. Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger. 1991. “The Politeness of Literary Texts.” In Literary Pragmatics, Roger Selled. by , 208–259. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sherzer, J. 1985. “Puns and Jokes.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 78–92. London, England: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 1989. “Politeness Phenomena in Ionescu’s The Lesson.” In Language, Discourse and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Discourse Stylistics, ed. by R. Carter, and P. Simpson, 171–193. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2007. “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 639–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies in Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Robert D. 1970. Language and Lewis Carroll. Berlin and New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 45–74. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Unknown Authors. 1991. The Merriam-Webster New Book of Word Histories. Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster Inc. Publishers.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard, Sahiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. 1992. “Introduction”. In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Richard Watts, ed. by Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westacott, Emrys. (2018, June 27). “Humpty Dumpty’s Philosophy of Language.” ThoughtCo. [URL]Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, 3rd ed., Oxford: Blackwell, 1967.Google Scholar