Cover not available
Part of
Fixed Expressions: Building language structure and social action
Edited by Ritva Laury and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 315] 2020
► pp. 203–236

Chapter 8
Self-addressed questions as fixed expressions for epistemic stance marking in Japanese conversation

 | The University of Tokyo
 | Kyushu University
Speakers in conversation do not always produce utterances smoothly. Among the various ways of deferring utterance production, this chapter focuses on three kinds of self-addressed questions (SAQs) in Japanese conversation: nan-daroo ‘what would it be,’ nan-te-yuu-no ‘what do you call it,’ and nan-da-kke ‘what was it again.’ Through quantitative analyses, we argue that the SAQs should be treated as fixed expressions for marking the epistemic stance of the speaker. We then qualitatively examine how these SAQs are used in conversation and discuss that the use of the different types of SAQs, each of which indicates a specific type of trouble, contributes to the management of progressivity of the interaction and intersubjectivity between participants.
Keywords: epistemic stance, uncertainty, speech disfluency, self-addressed questions, Japanese conversation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.Quantitative analysis: Collocation patterns of SAQs in casual conversation
    • 3.1Argument structure/realization
    • 3.2Final particles attached to SAQs
    • 3.3Phonetic truncation and rapid articulation
  • 4.Qualitative analysis of SAQs
    • 4.1 nan-daroo
    • 4.2 nan-te-yuu-no
    • 4.3 nan-da-kke
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 10 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.315.08end
References (49)
References
Bybee, Joan, and Joanne Scheibman. 1999. “The Effect of Usage on Degrees of Constituency: The Reduction of don’t in English.” In Linguistics 37(4): 575–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endo, Tomoko, and Daisuke Yokomori. 2018. “Interactional Functions of Verbalizing Trouble: Self-addressed Questions in Japanese Conversation.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 25, ed. by Shin Fukuda, Mary Shin Kim, and Mee-Jeong Park, 327–339. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. (1979). “On Fluency.” In Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, ed. by Charles J. Fillmore, Daniel Kempler, and William S-Y. Wang, 85–102. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. (eds.). 2002. The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1987. “Forgetfulness as an Interactive Resource.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2): 115–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2010. Soliloquy in Japanese and English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2011. “Claiming Epistemic Primacy: Yo-marked Assessments in Japanese.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Territories of Knowledge in Japanese Conversation . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Radboud University Nijmegen.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. “Projection and grammar: Notes on the ‘Action-Projecting’ Use of the Distal Demonstrative Are in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 36(8): 1337–1374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Claiming Uncertainty in Recollection: A Study of Kke-marked Utterances in Japanese Conversation.” Discourse Processes 49(5): 391–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2014. “Agreement or Crystallization: Patterns of 1st and 2nd Person Subjects and Verbs of Cognition in Finnish Conversational Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 63: 63–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2007. “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” In Person reference in interaction, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang. 2011. “Clines of Subordination – Constructions with the German ‘Complement-Taking Predicate’ Glauben .” In Subordination in Conversation, ed. by Ritva Laury, and Ryoko Suzuki, 165–190. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2002. Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Stancetaking in Conversation: From Subjectivity to Intersubjectivity.” Text & Talk 26(6): 699–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “The Roles of I guess in Conversational Stancetaking.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 183–219. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of Japanese Language. Cambridge: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Koiso, Hanae, Yayoi Tanaka, Ryoko Watanabe, and Yasuharu Den. 2016. “A Large Scale Corpus of Everyday Japanese Conversation: On Methodology for Recording Naturally Occurring Conversations.” Proceedings of LREC 2016 Workshop on Casual Talk among Humans and Machines , 9–12.
Lakoff, George. 1972. “Hedges: a Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” The 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 183–228.
MacWhinney, Brian. 2007. “The TalkBank Project.” In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora: Synchronic Databases, Vol.1. ed. by Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, and Hermann L. Moisl, 163–180. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maekawa, Kikuo. 2003. “Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese: Its Design and Evaluation.” Proceedings of The ISCA & IEEE Workshop on Spontaneous Speech Processing and Recognition (SSPR 2003) , 7–12.
Masuoka, Takashi, and Yukinori Takubo. 1992. Kiso nihongo bumpoo [Basic Japanese Grammar]. Revised Edition. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publisher.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Ikuyo. 2010. “Hanashite ni naru koto, hanashite ni naroo to shinai koto: guruupu dhisukasshon ni mirareru nagai chinmoku kara [Becoming a speaker and avoiding being a speaker: Some observations on long silences in group discussion].” In Komyunikeeshon no kyookai to setsuzoku [Boundaries and connections in interaction], ed. by Daiji Kimura, Michio Nakamura, and Katsuya Takanashi, 254–272. Kyoto: Showadoo.Google Scholar
Morita, Emi. 2005. Negotiation of Contingent Talk: The Japanese Interactional Particles Ne and Sa . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, and Frances Hodgetts Syder. 1983. “Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency.” In Language and Communciation, ed. by Jack C. Richards, and Richard W. Schmidt, 191–226. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.). 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh huh’ and Other Things that Come between Sentences.” In Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1993. “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1): 99–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “Ten Operations in Self-initiated, Same-Turn Repair.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 41–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shimotani, Maki, and Tomoko Endo. 2015. “Sequential Patterns of Storytelling using Omotte in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Japanese Linguistics 30: 33–53.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers (eds.). 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko. 1990. “The Role of Particles in Japanese Gossip.” Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS16) , 315–324.
Takubo, Yukinori, and Satoshi Kinsui. 1997. “Discourse Management in terms of Mental Spaces.” Journal of Pragmatics 28(6): 741–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanomura, Tadaharu. 1989. Gendai nihongo no yoohoo I: ‘noda’ no imi to yoohoo [Usage of Contemporary Japanese I: The Meaning and usage of noda]. Osaka: Izumi shoin.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ““Object Complements” and Conversation towards a Realistic Account.” Studies in Language 26(1): 125–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tian, Ye, Takehiko Maruyama, and Jonathan Ginzburg. 2017. “Self Addressed Questions and Filled Pauses: A Cross-linguistic Investigation.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(4): 905–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Michiko. 2009. Features and Roles of Filled Pauses in Speech Communication. Tokyo: Hituzi shobo.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Michiko, Keikichi Hirose, Yasuharu Den, and Nobuaki Minematsu. 2008. “Filled Pause as Cues to the Complexity of Upcoming Phrases for Native and Non-native Listeners.” Speech Communication 50: 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamane, Chie. 2002. Nihongo no danwa ni okeru firaa [Fillers in Japanese Discourse]. Tokyo: Kuroshio publishers.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kushida, Shuya & Makoto Hayashi
2022.  Indicating Difficulty in Describing Something in Words: The Use of Koo in Word Searches in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction . Research on Language and Social Interaction 55:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.