Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of Text and Framing Phenomena: Historical approaches to paratext and metadiscourse in English
Edited by Matti Peikola and Birte Bös
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 317] 2020
► pp. 91–114

Chapter 4
Threshold-switching

Paratextual functions of scribal colophons in Old and Middle English manuscripts

| University of Birmingham
This chapter offers a new, material analysis of medieval scribal colophons, the brief writings that scribes added to manuscript texts. Gérard Genette saw the scribal colophon as the ancestor of ‘paratext’, the ‘threshold’ (‘seuil’) to the printed text. Contributing to current modification of paratext theory, this chapter considers what Genette’s model reveals about manuscript culture. It proposes that the scribal colophon turns the spotlight on the graphic properties of the scribe’s work rather than simply or predominantly serving as a threshold to reading the text. The chapter proposes that threshold-switching, a term in digital electronics for a process that causes oscillation between one state and another, may be a more appropriate metaphor than the threshold for this important function of the medieval scribal colophon. The colophon is evidence that, as in digital media today, in manuscript culture writing was not regarded simply as a transparent medium that one looked through to access the meaning beyond.
Keywords: colophon, scribe, medieval, manuscript, paratext
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Approaches to paratexts in medieval manuscripts
  • 3. Genette’s framework: Applications and adaptations
  • 4.Genette’s model and medieval scribal colophons
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Primary sources
  • Secondary sources
Published online: 18 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317.04sca
References (43)
Primary sources
Manuscripts
Aberystwyth
National Library of Wales, MS Peniarth 356B
Cambridge
Corpus Christi College, MS 41
Corpus Christi College, MS 140
St John’s College, MS E.34 (137)
Trinity College, MS B.14.39
University Library, MS Ff.1.5
Glasgow
University Library, Hunter MS 197
London
British Library, Additional MS 29729
British Library, Arundel MS 57
British Library, Cotton Nero MS D. iv
British Library, Cotton Otho MS C.i(1)
British Library, Cotton Vitellius MS E.xviii
British Library, Harley MS 1205
British Library, Lansdowne MS 348
British Library, Royal MS 17 A.xxvii
Wellcome Collection, MS 405
Manchester
John Rylands Library, MS Eng. 51
New York
Pierpont Morgan Library, Glazier MS 39
Oxford
Bodleian Library, MS Arch. Selden. B.10
Bodleian Library, MS Fairfax 16
Bodleian Library, MS. Gough Liturg. 19
Bodleian Library, MS Junius 121
Bodleian Library, MS Rawl. Poet. 138
Philadelphia
University of Pennsylvania Library, MS Codex 196
Editions, catalogues and indexes
Arngart, Olof (ed). 1968. The Middle English Genesis and Exodus: Re-edited from MS CCCC 444 with introduction, notes and glossary. Leeds Studies in English, 36.Google Scholar
Bénédictins du Bouveret. 1965–1982. Colophons de Manuscrits Occidentaux des Origines au XVIe Siècle. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires.Google Scholar
DIMEV: Mooney, Linne R., Daniel W. Mosser, and Elizabeth Solopova, with Deborah Thorpe and Daniel Hill Radcliffe. (n. d.). The DIMEV: An Open-Access, Digital Edition of the ‘Index of Middle English Verse’. [URL]
EM 1060–1220: Da Rold, Orietta, Takako Kato, Mary Swan, and Elaine Treharne (eds). 2018. The Production and Use of English Manuscripts 1060 to 1220 (Stanford: Stanford University). [URL]
LAEME: Laing, Margaret. 2008, 2013. A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325, Version 3.2. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. [URL]
LALME: Benskin, Michael, Margaret Laing, Vasilos Karaiskos, and Keith Williamson. 2013. An Electronic Version of A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. [URL], revised online edition of McIntosh, Angus, Michael L. Samuels, and Michael Benskin. 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Mediaeval English, 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Lewis, Robert E., and Angus McIntosh. 1982. A Descriptive Guide to the Manuscripts of the Prick of Conscience. Oxford: Society for the Study of Mediaeval Languages and Literature.Google Scholar
Lydgate, John. (c. 1521). The prouerbes of Lydgate. London: Wynkyn de Worde. (STC 17026).Google Scholar
MWM: Scase, Wendy (ed). 2009. Manuscripts of the West Midlands: A Catalogue of Vernacular Manuscript Books of the English West Midlands c. 1300 – c. 1475, revised edn. Sheffield: University of Sheffield. [URL]
STC: The English Short Title Catalogue. [URL]
Secondary sources
Birke, Dorothee, and Birte Christ. 2013. “Paratext and Digitized Narrative: Mapping the Field.” Narrative 21 (1): 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michelle. 2016. “Aspects of Aldred’s Agenda in Glossing the Lindisfarne Gospels.” In The Old English Gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, Author and Context, ed. by Julia Fernández Cuesta, and Sara M. Pons-Sanz, 13–36. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Curt F. 1964. “Prayers and Charms in Certain Middle English Scrolls.” Speculum, 39 (2): 270–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ciotti, Giovanni, and Marco Franceschini. 2016. “Certain Times and Uncertain Places: A Study on Scribal Colophons of Manuscripts written in Tamil and Tamilian Scripts.” In Tracing Manuscripts in Time and Space through Paratexts, ed. by Giovanni Ciotti, and Hang Lin, 59–130, Studies in Manuscript Cultures 7. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ciotti, Giovanni, and Hang Lin. 2016. “Preface.” In Tracing Manuscripts in Time and Space through Paratexts, ed. by Giovanni Ciotti, and Hang Lin, vii–xii, Studies in Manuscript Cultures 7. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Margaret. 1998. John Shirley: Book Production and the Noble Household in Fifteenth-Century England. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Ira. 2014. “The Margins of Bookishness: Paratexts in Digital Culture.” In Examining Paratextual Theory and its Applications in Digital Culture, ed. by Nadine Desrochers, and Daniel Apollon, 24–45. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, an imprint of IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fein, Susanna. 2014. “The Contents of Robert Thornton’s Manuscripts.” In Robert Thornton and his Books, ed. by Susanna Fein. Woodbridge: York Medieval Press with Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar
Friedman, John B. 1995. Northern English Books, Owners, and Makers in the Late Middle Ages. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Gameson, Richard. 2002. The Scribe Speaks? Colophons in Early English Manuscripts, H. M. Chadwick Memorial Lectures 12. Cambridge: Dept of Anglo-Saxon Norse and Celtic, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1987. Seuils. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
, trans. Jane E. Lewin. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Literature, Culture, Theory 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra. 2003. “‘These proverbes yet do last’: Lydgate, the Fifth Earl of Northumberland, and Tudor Miscellanies from Print to Manuscript.” The Yearbook of English Studies, 33: 215–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glorieux-De Gand, Thérèse, and Ann Kelders. 1991. Formules de Copiste: Les Colophons des manuscrits datés. Brussels: Bibliothèque Royale.Google Scholar
Görke, Andreas, and Konrad Hirschler (eds). 2011. Manuscript Notes as Documentary Sources. Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan. 2010. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Heather L., and Jen L. Pecoskie. 2014. “Iterations and Evolutions: Paratext and Intertext in Fanfiction.” In Examining Paratextual Theory and its Applications in Digital Culture, ed. by Nadine Desrochers, and Daniel Apollon, 143–158. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, an imprint of IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanham, Richard. 1993. The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leopold, David A., and Nikos K. Logothetis. 1999. “Multistable Phenomena: Changing Views in Perception.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (7): 254–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liira, Aino. 2020. Paratextuality in Manuscript and Print: Verbal and Visual Presentation of the Middle English Polychronicon. Doctoral dissertation. Turku: University of Turku. [URL]:ISBN:978-951-29-8058-1
McCracken, Ellen. 2013. “Expanding Genette’s Epitext/Peritext Model for Transitional Electronic Literature: Centrifugal and Centripetal Vectors on Kindles and iPads.” Narrative, 21 (1): 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muzerelle, Denis. 2002–2003 [1985]. Vocabulaire codicologique: Répertoire méthodique des termes français relatifs aux manuscrits avec leurs équivalents en anglais, italien, espagnol, version 1.1. Paris: Institut de Recherche et d’Histoire des Textes. [URL]
Nees, Lawrence. 2003. “Reading Aldred’s Colophon for the Lindisfarne Gospels.” Speculum, 78 (2): 333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED: Oxford English Dictionary. [URL]
Pecoskie, Jen L., and Nadine Desrochers. 2013. “Hiding in Plain Sight: Paratextual Utterances as Tools for Information-related Research and Practice.” Library and Information Science Research, 35 (3): 232–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynhout, Lucien. 2006. Formules latines de colophons, 2 vols. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Scase, Wendy. forthc. “John Benet, Scribe and Compiler, and Dublin, Trinity College, MS 516.” In Scribal Cultures in Late Medieval England: Essays in Honour of Linne R. Mooney, ed. by Margaret Connolly, Holly James-Maddocks, and Derek Pearsall. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Scattergood, John. 2006. “The Copying of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts.” In Manuscripts and Ghosts: Essays on the Transmission of Medieval and Early Renaissance Literature, by John Scattergood, 21–82. Dublin: Four Courts.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. 2011. “The Beginning of ‘The End’: Terminal Paratext and the Birth of Print Culture.” In Renaissance Paratexts, ed. by Helen Smith, and Louise Wilson, 65-88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Techasiriwan, Apiradee. 2016. “Locating Tai Lü and Tai Khün Manuscripts in Space and Time through Colophons.” In Tracing Manuscripts in Time and Space through Paratexts, Studies in Manuscript Cultures 7, ed. by Giovanni Ciotti, and Hang Lin, 35–58. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, David (ed). 1984. An Edition of the Middle English Grammatical Texts. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. 1937. “Copyists’ Final Jingles in Medieval Manuscripts.” Speculum 12 (2): 268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1956. “More Copyists’ Final Jingles.” Speculum 31 (2): 321–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar