Part of
Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 145172
References (37)
Alston, William P.
2000Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975How to Do Things with Words (2nd rev., ed. by James O. Urmson, and Marina Sbisà). Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1962]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2018 “Relational Work in Multimodal Networked Interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 134–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(4): 501–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, Caleb T., David B. Schrock, and Patricia Dauterman
2012 “Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31(2): 176–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiNucci, Darcy
1999 “Fragmented Future.” Print 53(32): 221–222.Google Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring
2010 “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20: 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Sage L.
2007 “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-Mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 742–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Relationality, Friendship, and Identity in Digital Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 305–320. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2004 “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and Jannis Androutsopoulos
2015 “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. by Deborah Tannen, Deborah S. Schiffrin, and Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton, 127–151. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà
2017 “Credibilità e disseminazione di conoscenze nei social network [Credibility and Knowledge Dissemination in Social Networks].” Iride 30: 63–86.Google Scholar
Lewis, David
1979 “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsili, Neri
2020 “Retweeting: Its Linguistic and Epistemic Value.” Synthese. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G.
2005Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, Tim
2007 “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” Communications & Strategies 65: 17–37.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
1984 “On Illocutionary Types.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “Acts of Explanation: A Speech Act Analysis.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Argumentation. Vol. 2, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles Arthur Willard, 7–17. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1989Linguaggio, ragione, interazione. Per una pragmatica degli atti linguistici [Language, Reason, Interaction. For a Pragmatic Theory of Speech Acts]. Bologna: il Mulino; reprinted as a digital edition by Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2009 [the page numbers indicated in the paper refer to the digital edition]. [URL] (accessed 10 April 2018).
1990 “Speech Acts and the Expression of Affect.” Grazer Linguistische Studien 33–34: 279–295.Google Scholar
1999 “Ideology and the Persuasive Use of Presupposition.” In Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. 1, ed. by Jef Verschueren, 492–509. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
2001 “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Communicating Citizenship in Verbal Interaction: Principles of a Speech Act Oriented Discourse Analysis.” In Analysing Citizenship Talk: Social Positioning in Political and Legal Decision-Making Processes, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, and Alfons Bora, 164–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “How to Read Austin.” Pragmatics 17: 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Uptake and Conventionality in Illocution.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Varieties of Speech Act Norms.” In Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions, ed. by Maciej Witek, and Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 23–50. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Assertion among the Speech Acts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Assertion, ed. by Sanford C. Goldberg, 159–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind and Knowledge, ed. by Keith Gunderson, 344–369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken
1985Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Thomas W.
2017 “Telepresence and Trust: A Speech-Act Theory of Mediated Communication.” Philosophy & Technology 30: 443–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1964 “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts.” The Philosophical Review 73: 439–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witek, Maciej
2013 “Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Act.” Dialogue and Universalism 23: 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “An Interactional Account of Illocutionary Practice.” Language Sciences 47: 43–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2014 “El discurso de las identidades en línea: El caso de Facebook [The Discourse of Online Identities: The Case of Facebook].” Discurso & Sociedad 8: 398–426.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by 8 other publications

Mullan, Kerry
2024. “Resident superhero”. Internet Pragmatics 7:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Virtanen, Tuija
2024. Chapter 8. Pretending to pretend. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343],  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Caponetto, Laura & Paolo Labinaz
2023. Marina Sbisà’s Deontic Approach to Speech Actions. In Sbisà on Speech as Action [Philosophers in Depth, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
McGowan, Mary Kate
2023. On Media Reports, Politicians, Indirection, and Duplicity. Topoi 42:2  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Sbisà, Marina
2023. Essays on Speech Acts and Other Topics in Pragmatics, DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Galia Hirsch
2023. What kind of laughter?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
García-Sánchez, Soraya
2021. TED talks: multimodal communicative affordances for EPS/ELF dissemination. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 10:2  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.