Part of
Beyond Meaning
Edited by Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure and Tim Wharton
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 324] 2021
► pp. 2942
References
Ariel, Mira
1990Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001 “Accessibility Theory: An Overview.” In Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, ed. by Ted J. Sanders, Joost Schliperoord, and Wilbert Spooren, 29‒97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2000 “Indicators and Procedures: Nevertheless and but .” Journal of Linguistics 36: 463‒486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Billy
2012 “The Relevance of Tones: Prosodic Meanings in Utterance Interpretation and in Relevance Theory.” The Linguistic Review 29 (4): 643‒661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Procedures and Prosody: Weak Encoding and Weak Communication.” In Beyond Words: Content, Context, and Inference, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia Schulze, 151‒181. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein
2002 “Intonation as a Constraint on Inferential Processing.” In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, Aix-en-Provence, France, ed. by Bernard Bell, and Isabelle Marlien, 59‒64.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2004The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Alison
2007 “Do Discourse Markers Encode Concepts or Procedures?Lingua 111 (1): 149‒174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Jill
2006 “Constructing a Context with Intonation.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1542‒1558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imai, Kunihiko
1998 “Intonation and Relevance.” In Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, ed. by Robyn Carston, and Seiji Uchida, 69‒86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iten, Corinne
2005Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsui, Tomoko
2000Bridging and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sax, Daniel J
2011 “Sentence Stress and the Procedures of Comprehension.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspective, ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 349‒381. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate
2017 “Prosody, Procedures and Pragmatics.” In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line, ed. by Ilse Depraetere, and Raphael Salkie, 323‒341. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Referring Expressions, Pragmatics and Style: Reference and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Kate, and Rebecca Jackson
2020 “When Everything Stands Out, Nothing Does: Typography, Expectations and Procedures.” In Relevance Theory, Figuration and Continuity in Pragmatics, ed. by Agnieszka Piskorska, 167‒192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wells, John C
2006English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2003 “Interjections, Language, and the Showing/Saying Continuum.” Pragmatics and Cognition 11 (1): 39‒91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Pragmatics and Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2011 “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspective, ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 3‒31. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Reassessing the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction.” Lingua 175 (6): 5‒19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2019 “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-propositional Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31‒38. DOI logo.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2012Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Tim Wharton
2006 “Relevance and Prosody.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1559‒1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Helganger, Line Sjøtun & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
2023. Intonational production as a window into children’s early pragmatic competence: The case of the Norwegian polarity focus and two jo particles. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Madella, Pauline & Tim Wharton
2023. Nonverbal Communication and Context: Multimodality in Interaction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context,  pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Scott, Kate
2021. Memes as multimodal metaphors. Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.