Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 143–170

Chapter 5
Verb-based discourse markers in Italian

Guarda, vedi, guarda te, vedi te

ORCID logo | Ghent University
This research deals with verb-based discourse markers in the regional Italian of Veneto: guarda (te) ‘look you’, vedi (te) ‘see you’. We show that these markers differ in terms of functions and syntactic features. We argue that the functions differ depending on the discourse markers’ syntactic position: some functions can be realized only in the left periphery, while others can be realized in both peripheries. When in the left periphery, the discourse markers express the speaker’s attitude, have their own illocutionary force and are much more independent from the preceding linguistic context. Conversely, the discourse markers that can be realized in both peripheries seem to have a reinforcement and interactional role, being strictly dependent on the dialogical context.
Keywords: Italian, discourse markers, left periphery, right periphery
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Guarda, vedi, guarda te, vedi te
    • 2.1Method of data collection
      • 2.1.1Stimuli
      • 2.1.2Participants
      • 2.1.3Results
      • 2.1.4Procedure
      • 2.1.5English translations
    • 2.2The data: interpretation and syntactic distribution
      • 2.2.1Surprise
      • 2.2.2Warning
      • 2.2.3Phatic functions: To initiate and close the turn
      • 2.2.4Adversative
      • 2.2.5Obviousness
    • 2.3Interim summary
  • 3.Discourse markers and the peripheries
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.05bad
References (62)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1989. “Themes and Tails: The Discourse Functions of Dislocated Elements”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badan, Linda. 2020. “Italian Discourse Markers: The Case of guarda te .” Studia Linguistica 74 (2): 303–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Joseph, Roland Hinterhölzl, and Andreas Trotzke. 2015. “Issues in Discourse-oriented Syntax”. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, ed. by Joseph Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl, and Andreas Trotzke, 1–12. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 1990. “Phatic Connectives as Interactional Cues in Contemporary Spoken Italian”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (4): 629–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “I segnali discorsivi”. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, ed. by Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi, and Anna Cardinaletti, 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Segnali discorsivi nel parlato e nello scritto”. In Scritto e parlato. Metodi, testi e contesti. ed. by Maurizio Dardano, Adriana Pelo, and Antonella Stefinlongo, 79–97. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Segnali discorsivi e sviluppi conversazionali”. In Italiano parlato. Analisi di un dialogo, ed. by Federico Albano Leoni, and Rosa Giordano, 137–157. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla, Claudia Caffi, and Marina Sbisá. 1991. “Scalar dimensions of illocutionary force.” In Speech Acts: Fiction or Reality?, ed. by Igor Zagar, 63–76. Ljubljana: Institute for Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges. 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 1987. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, and Michelle Sheehan. 2011. “Introduction: Particles through a Modern Syntactic Lens”. The Linguistic Review (special edition on Particles in Syntax) 28: 387–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 1988. Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. “German and Italian Modal Particles and Clause Structure”. The Linguistic Review 28 (4): 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Italian Verb-based Discourse Particles in a Comparative Perspective”. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, ed. by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl, and Andreas Trotzke, 71–91. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo. 1999. “A Comparative Analysis of Left and Right Dislocation in Romance”. Studia Linguistica 53 (1): 40–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Projections: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo, and Luigi Rizzi. 2008. “The Cartography of Syntactic Structures”. Studies in Linguistics 2: 43–59.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco, and Iulia Zegrean. 2012. “Splitting up Force”. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, Lobke Aelbrecht, and Rachel Nye, 190–229. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia, and Alessandro Vietti. 2011. “Italian and Italo-Romance Dialects”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 210: 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCat, Cecile. 2007. French Dislocation. Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie Bert, and Paola Pietrandrea (eds). 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. “Mirativity: The grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information”. Linguistic Typology 1 (1): 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit. 2002. “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: A Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21 (2): 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane. 2009. “Discourse Markers and Regional Variation in French. A Lexico- Semantic Approach”. In Sociolinguistic Variation in Contemporary French, ed. by Kate Beeching, Nigel Armstrong, and Françoise Gadet, 201–214. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1991. “Four Properties of Speech-in-Interaction and the Notion of Translocutionary Act”. In Pragmatics at Issue: Selected Papers of the 1987 International Pragmatics Conference, ed. by Jeff Verschueren, 133–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durham, Mercedes. 2011. “Right Dislocation in Northern England: Frequency and Use –Perception Meets Reality”. English World-Wide 32 (3): 257–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara, and Piera Molinelli. 2019. “Italian ma ‘but’ in Deverbal Pragmatic Markers: Forms, Functions, and Productivity of a Pragma-dyad”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 26: 29–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2004. “Dislocation, Clitic Resumption and Minimality. A Comparative Analysis of Left and Right Topic Constructions in Italian”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002, ed. by Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, and Petra Sleeman, 99–118. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. “What are Discourse Markers?”. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1980. “The Study of Balkan Admirativity: Its History and Development”. Balkanistica 6: 7–30.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara. 2012. “Guarda, secondo me stai sbagliando! Marcatori interazionali da verbi di percezione in italiano contemporaneo”. In La lingua e la letteratura italiana in Europa. Atti del Convegno internazionale di studi di Craiova, ed. by Elena Pîrvu, 143–163. Craiova: Editura Universitaria Craiova.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara, and Piera Molinelli. 2014. “Italian guarda, prego, dai. Pragmatic Markers and the Left and Right Periphery”. In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 117–150. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Segnali allocutivi di richiamo: percorsi pragmatici e sviluppi diacronici tra latino e italiano”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 22: 21–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2010. About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. “West Flemish Verb-based Discourse Markers and the Articulation of the Speech Act Layer”. Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 116–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, and Virginia Hill. 2013. "The Syntacticization of Discourse". In Syntax and Its Limits, ed. by Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali, and Robert Truswell, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2010. “How to Refer to Yourself when Talking to Yourself”. New Castle Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 57–65.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter, and Wulf Oesterreicher. 2001. “Langage parlé et langage écrit”. In Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik (LRL) Vol. I/2G, ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin, and Christian Schmitt, 584–627. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. “Dislocation”. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Vol. 2, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible, 1050–1078. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ocampo, Francisco. 2009. “Mirá: From Verb to Discourse Particle in Rioplatense Spanish”. In Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Joseph Collentine Maryellen García, Barbara Lafford, and Francisco Marcos Marín, 254–267. Somerville, Ma: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler R. G. 2010. Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Gitksan at the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. PhD dissertation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 1998. “Oye y mira o los limites de la conexión”. In Los marcadores del discurso, ed. by Maria A. Martín Zorraquino, and José Portolés Lázaro, 213–288. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In Elements of Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulet, Eddy. 1984. “Speech Acts, Discourse Structure, and Pragmatic Connectives”. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 31–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. “When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-Periphery”. Lingua 116: 836–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 1989. Linguaggio, ragione, interazione. Per una teoria degli atti linguistici. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1982. “Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation”. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 28.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2000. “Invoking Scalarity: The Development of in fact ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 5: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy, and Carol L. Tenny, C. 2003. “Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles”. In Asymmetry in Grammar 1, ed. by Anna M. DiSciullo, 315–345. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Investigating “Periphery” from a Functionalist Perspective”. Linguistics Vanguard 1 (1): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Annie. 2005. Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on the Use of Grammaticality Judgment Tasks in Linguistic Theory. Second Language Studies 24 (1): 129–167.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1986 [1934]. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2002. “Imperatives, Interruption in Conversion, and the Rise of Discourse Markers: a Study of Italian guarda ”. Linguistics, 40 (5): 987–1010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina, and Johannes Heim. 2016. “The Syntax of Confirmationals. A Neo-performative Analysis”. In Outside the Clause. Form and Function of Extra-clausal Constituents, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer, and Arne Lohmann, 303–340. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winsler, Adam, Charles Fernyhough, and Ignacio Montero (eds). 2009. Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Biasio, Marco & Dario Del Fante
2024. Once known, always known. Turn-final sai in North-East regional Italian. Folia Linguistica DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2023. L’espressione dell’epistemicità e dell’evidenzialità in siciliano. Gli avverbi in -ca . Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 30 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Galiano, Liviana
2023. Pragmatic markers in English and Italian film dialogue. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Vittorio Tantucci
2022. Getting attention in different languages: A usage-based approach to parenthetical look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.