Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 1–16

Introduction
Pragmatic markers and peripheries

An overview

ORCID logo | Lancaster University
ORCID logo | Vilnius University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Periphery
  • 3.Functions
  • 4.Diachrony
  • 5.Across languages
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.int
References (60)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds). 2006. Pragmatic Markers in Contrast. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2016a. Pragmatic Markers in British English: Meaning in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. “ Alors/donc/then at the Right Periphery: Seeking Confirmation of an Inference.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 208–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate, Liesbeth Degand, Ulrich Detges, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Richard Waltereit. 2009. “Summary of the Workshop on Meaning in Diachrony.” Paper presented at the Conference on Meaning in Interaction , Bristol, April.
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges. 2014. “Introduction.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bello, Iria, Carolina Bernales, Maria Vittoria Calvi, and Elena Landone (eds). 2019. Cognitive Insights into Discourse Markers and Second Language Acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Function. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2015. “Italian Verb-based Discourse Particles in a Comparative Perspective.” In Discourse-oriented Syntax, ed. by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl, and Andreas Trotzke, 71–91. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celle, Agnès, and Ruth Huart (eds). 2007. Connectives as Discourse Landmarks. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Defour, Tine, Ulrique D’Hondt, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, and Dominique Willems. 2010. “Degrees of Pragmaticalization: The Divergent Histories of ‘actually’ and actuellement .” Languages in Contrast 10 (2): 166–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth. 2011. “Connectieven in de rechterperiferie: Een contrastieve analyse van dus en donc in gesproken taal [Connectives in the right periphery: A contrastive analysis of dus and donc in spoken language].” Nederlandse Taalkunde 16 (3): 333–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “‘So very fast very fast then’: Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 151–178. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, and Bettina Braun. 2013. “The Prosody of Question Tags.” English Language and Linguistics 17 (1): 129–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara, and Andrea Sansò. 2017a. “Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here?” In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives, ed. by Chiara Fedriani, and Andrea Sansò, 1–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2017b. Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2009. “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Miriam, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2005. “Construction Grammar and Spoken Interaction: A Case of Pragmatic Particles.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (11): 1752–1778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems, and Freek Van de Velde. 2012. “Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification: Typology and Operationalization.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 128–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post (eds). 2015. Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-final then in Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final Particles in English.” Language & Communication 32 (3): 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Discourse Marker Sequences: Insights into the Serial Order of Communicative Tasks in Real-time Turn Production.” Journal of Pragmatics 146: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko, Noriko O. Onodera, and Sung-Ock S. Sohn (eds). 2016. Periphery: Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2).Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu, and Mitsuko Narita Izutsu. 2013. “From Discourse Markers to Modal/final Particles: What the Position Reveals about the Continuum.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, and Paola Pietrandrea, 217–235. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine, and Tania Kuteva. 2011. “On Thetical Grammar.” Studies in Language 35 (4): 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koops, Christian, and Arne Lohmann. 2015. “A Quantitative Approach to the Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers: Evidence from their Sequencing Behavior.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 232–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2007. “Interplay of (Inter)subjectivity and Social Norm.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 239–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Setting up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 92–116. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador, and Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds). 2018. Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2016. “LP and RP in the Development of Discourse Markers from “what” in Korean.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 255–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salameh Jiménez, Shima, María Estéllesa, and Salvador Pons Bordería. 2018. “Beyond the Notion of Periphery: An Account of Polyfunctional Discourse Markers within the Val.Es.Co. Model of Discourse Segmentation.” In Positioning the Self and Others: Linguistic Perspectives, ed. By Kate Beeching, Chiara Ghezzi, and Piera Molinelli, 105–125. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Ina. 2007. “Wat doet dat woord daar, zeg? Over het tussenwerpsel zeg [What is that word doing there, say? On the interjection zeg ].” Voortgang 25: 373–385.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siepmann, Dirk. 2005. Discourse Markers across Languages: A Contrastive Study of Second- level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stukker, Ninke, Ted Sanders, and Arie Verhagen. 2008. “Causality in Verbs and in Discourse Connectives: Converging Evidence of Cross-level Parallels in Dutch Linguistic Categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (7): 1296–1322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio. 2017. “From Immediate to Extended Intersubjectification: A Gradient Approach to Intersubjective Awareness and Semasiological Change.” Language and Cognition 9 (1): 88–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac. 1991. “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization: Types of Grammatical Markers, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Investigating “Periphery” from a Functionalist Perspective.” Linguistics Vanguard 1 (1): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “On the Rise of Types of Clause-final Pragmatic Markers in English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (1): 26–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizbeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Wouden, Ton, and Ad Foolen. 2015. “Dutch Particles in the Right Periphery.” In Final Particles, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post, 221–247. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1979. “Pragmatic Connectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 3 (5): 447–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël. 2010. “Imperatives of Visual versus Auditory Perception as Pragmatic Markers in English and Dutch.” English Text Construction 3 (1): 74–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The Imperative of Intentional Visual Perception as a Pragmatic Marker: A Contrastive study of Dutch, English and Romance.” In Pragmatic Markers and Pragmaticalization, ed. by Peter Lauwers, Gudrun Vanderbauwhede, and Stijn Verleyen, 95–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “The Imperative of Say as a Pragmatic Marker in English and Dutch.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25 (3): 247–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “A Diachronic Corpus Study of Prenominal zo’n ‘so a’ in Dutch: Pathways and (Inter)subjectification.” Functions of Language 26 (2): 216–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2002. “Imperatives, Interruption in Conversation, and the Rise of Discourse Markers: A Study of Italian guarda .” Linguistics 40 (5): 987–1010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Van Olmen, Daniël & Vittorio Tantucci
2022. Getting attention in different languages: A usage-based approach to parenthetical look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.