Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 109
Agha, Asif
2007Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ayoub, Millicent R.
1964 “Bi-Polarity in Arabic Kinship Terms.” Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists Cambridge, Mass., August 27–31, 1962, ed. by Horace G. Lunt, 1100–1106. London and the Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann
1966The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1990 “You Don’t Touch Lettuce with Your Fingers: Parental Politeness in Family Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 259–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike
1988Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin, New York, NY and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. New York, NY and London: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
Butler, Carly W., Susan Danby and Michael Emmison
2011 “Address Terms in Turn Beginnings: Managing Disalignment and Disaffiliation in Telephone Counselling.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44: 338–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, Asta and Anna Ekström
2019 “Emotion Socialization in Teacher-Child Interaction: Teachers’ Responses to Children’s Negative Emotions.” Frontiers in Psychology 10, article 1546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2010 “Address Terms in the Service of Other Actions: The Case of News Interview Talk.” Discourse & Communication 4 (2): 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Agency in Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 57: 290–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra and Jonathan Potter
2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12: 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by R. Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
2010 “Husserl, Intersubjectivity and Anthropology.” Anthropological Theory 10 (1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1972 “Sociolinguistic Rules: Alteration and Co-Occurrence.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by J. Gumperez and D. Hymes, 213–250. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja
2016 “Introduction: Discourse, Grammar and Intersubjectivity.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39 (2): 101–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1980 “Conversational Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galeano, Giorgia and Alessandro Fasulo
2009 “Sequenze direttive tra genitori e figli.” Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa 2/2009: 261–278.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F.
1990Referential Practice, Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
1992 “Deictic Categories as Mitigating Devices.” Pragmatics 2 (4): 505–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B.
1996 “Projections, Transpositions, and Relativity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John Gumperz and Stephen Levinson, 271–323. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK and Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009 “Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance.” In Stance, Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1995 “Gestures as Illocutionary and Discourse Structure Markers in Southern Italian Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 247–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
2006 “Agent, Person, Subject, Self.” Semiotica 162: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
2003 “Selecting Next Speaker: The Context-Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free Organization.” Language in Society 32: 177–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn-constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond and Jack Sidnell, 95–134. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2009Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mead, George H.
1934Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1979Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin and Camilla Wide
2015 “Introduction: Address as Social Action across Cultures and Contexts.” In Address Practice as Social Action: European Perspectives, ed. by Catrin Norrby and Camilla Wide, 1–12. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, Dilworth B.
1985Constructing the Social Context of Communication: Terms of Address in Egyptian Arabic. Berlin, New York, NY and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauletto, Franco, Karin Aronsson and Giorgia Galeano
2017 “Endearment and Address Terms in Family Life: Children’s and Parents’ Requests in Italian and Swedish Dinnertime Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 109: 82–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piippo, Irina
2012 “Viewing Norms Dialogically: An Action-Oriented Approach to Sociolinguistic Metatheory.” PhD dissertation. University of Helsinki.
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2007 “ ‘Catherine, You’re Wasting Your Time’: Address Terms within the Australian Political Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1503–1525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “ ‘Mate’ as a Term of Address in Ordinary Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1201–1218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar
1976 “On the Architecture of Intersubjectivity.” In Social Psychology in Transition, ed. by Lloyd H. Strickland, Frances J. Aboud and Kenneth J. Gergen, 163–175. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1992 “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred
1982Collected Papers. Vol. 1, The Problem of Social Reality, ed. by Maurice Natanson and H. L. van Breda. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2014 “The Architecture of Intersubjectivity Revisited.” In Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Nick. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman and Jack Sidnell, 364–399. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visakko, Tomi
2015Self-Promotion as Semiotic Behavior: The Mediation of Personhood in Light of Finnish Online Dating Advertisements. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Wilson, Nick
2019 “When We Means You: The Social Meaning of English Pseudo-Inclusive Personal Pronouns.” In The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A Comparative Approach, ed. by Paul Bouissac, 35–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yassin, Mahmoud Aziz. F.
1975 “A Linguistic Study of Forms of Address in Kuwaiti Colloquial Arabic.” PhD dissertation. Leeds University.
Yassin, Mahmoud Aziz. F.
1977 “Bi-Polar Terms of Address in Kuwaiti Arabic.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 40 (2): 297–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar