Cover not available
Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan K. Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 279–302

Achieving the intersubjectivity of sensorial practices

Body, language, and the senses in tasting activities

 | University of Helsinki | University of Basel
Intersubjectivity is a crucial issue not only for how participants in social interaction communicate and coordinate shared projects, but also for how they engage in sensing the material world around them while they are jointly acting in that world. This paper offers an ethnomethodological and conversation analytic study of sensoriality that provides for a multimodal interactional analysis of sensory practices. On the basis of a video-recorded beer tasting session, I show how, far from being limited to individual and neuro-physiological processes, situated activities of sensing are a collective accomplishment here and now, emerging within joint activities of searching, finding, and sharing relevant features of taste, building agreements, and overcoming divergent views.
Keywords: conversation analysis, ethnomethodology, multimodality, social interaction, sensoriality, body, language, sensing, tasting, intersubjectivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.From individual experiences to public evidences of sensorial qualities: Sharing sensations
    • 2.1The evidence of ‘smoke’ (Group 1)
    • 2.2The evidence of ‘smoky’ (Group 2)
  • 3.Searching for what it tastes: Building intersubjectivity
    • 3.1Searching for taste: From the glass to the aroma wheel
    • 3.2Finding taste descriptors: Overhearing from one table to another
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Transcription conventions
  • References
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.13mon
References (29)
References
Backhouse, Anthony E. 2005 [1994]. The Lexical Field of Taste: A Semantic Study of Japanese Taste Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barretto, Robert P. J., Sarah Gillis-Smith, Jayaram Chandrashekar, David A. Yarmolinsky, Mark J. Schnitzer, Nicholas J.P. Ryba, and Charles S. Zuker. 2015. “The Neural Representation of Taste Quality at the Periphery.” Nature 517: 373–376.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. 1993. Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Croijmans Ilja, and Majid Asifa. 2016. “Not All Flavor Expertise Is Equal: The Language of Wine and Coffee Experts.” PLoS ONE 11 (6): e0155845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fele, Giolo. 2016. “Il paradosso del gusto.” Società Mutamento Politica 7 (14): 151–174.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1978. “Response Cries.” Language 54 (4): 787–815.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Footing.” Semiotica25: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2017. Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile (eds). 2013. Interaction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Harry T. 1984. “Flavor Description of White Wine by ‘Expert’ and Nonexpert Wine Consumers.” Journal of Food Science 49 (1): 120–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Ariane. 1983. Wine and Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liberman Ken. 2013. “The Phenomenology of Coffee Tasting: Lessons in Practical Objectivity.” More Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (2): 2–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018a. “Visual Practices: Video Studies, Multimodality and Multisensoriality. In Co-Operative Engagements in Intertwined Semiosis: Essays in Honour of Charles Goodwin, ed. by Donald Favareau, 304–325. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
2021. “The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops.” Discourse Studies 20 (6): 743–769.Google Scholar
2018c. “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” ROLSI 51 (1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Contemporary Issues in Conversation Analysis: Embodiment and Materiality, Multimodality and Multisensoriality in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 47–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. “Audible Sniffs: Smelling-in-Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53 (1): 140–163.Google Scholar
In press. Sensing in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2015. “The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction.” ROLSI 48 (2): 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa (eds.). 2015. Interacting with Objects. Language, Materiality and Social Activity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Alessandra Fasulo. 1996. “Socializing Taste.” Ethnos 61 (1–2): 7–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steve. 2011. “Changing Tastes: How Foods Tasted in the Early Modern Period and How They Taste Now.” In The Hans Rausing Lecture. Salvia Småskrifter 14. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. Collected Papers. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2011. “The Changing Meanings of Things: Found Objects and Inscriptions in Social Interaction.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 67–78. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. Goodwin Charles and Curtis LeBaron (eds.). 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Sally. 2002. “Talking with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure.”  Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35 (3), 311–336.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Barnes, Scott & Francesco Possemato
2024. Multimodal Analysis of Interaction. In The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, Second Edition, ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.