Cover not available
Part of
Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts: From global to local discourses
Edited by Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 342] 2024
► pp. 1–13

Chapter 1
Self- and other-reference in social contexts

From global to local discourses

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
This introductory chapter sets the scene for the contributions to this volume which are all focused on the analysis of self- and other-reference in social contexts. In this chapter, we provide an overview of previous approaches to reference and context, offering a foundation on which the following studies will build. The focus is on the study of self- and other-reference that is constructed or represented in various social contexts through specific markers, such as personal pronouns, or other referential expressions. This chapter also provides an introduction to the theoretical and methodological approaches of the chapters.
Keywords: self-reference, other-reference, social context, identification, group membership
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Reference to self and others
  • 3.Contexts in discourses
  • 4.Chapters in the volume
  • References
Published online: 14 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.342.01pal
References (36)
References
Abbott, Barbara. 2010. Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn. 2017. “Context and Historical (Socio-)Pragmatics Twenty Years on.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (2): 315–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate, Chiara Ghezzi, and Piera Molinelli. 2018. “Introduction.” In Positioning the self and Others: Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Kate Beeching, Chiara Ghezzi, and Piera Molinelli, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society 13 (2): 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4/5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Firth, John R. 1950. “Personality and Language in Society.” The Sociological Review 42 (1): 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, and Barbara Abbott. 2019. “Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reference, ed. by Jeanette Gundel, and Barbara Abbott, 1–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, Paul. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2013. “First-Person Reference in Discourse: Aims and Strategies.” Journal of Pragmatics 48: 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Siegfried. 2001. Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung, 3rd ed. Duisburg: DISS.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2014. “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions.” In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker, and Jukka Tuominen, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Janus, and Nikolas Coupland. 2018. “Style and Styling.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, 21st Annual Installment, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 201–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2010. Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2011. “Altering Distance and Defining Authority: Person Reference in Late Modern English.” In Historical Sociopragmatics, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2014. “Constructing Collectivity with ‘we’: An Introduction.” In Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2014. Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Robert Bailey et al., 67–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisig, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul. 2013. “Conversation Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Robert Bailey et al., 91–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanja, N. J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2007. “Person Reference in Interaction.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri (ed.). 1982. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
2001a. “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
2001b. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse.” In Identity, Belonging and Migration, ed. by Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones, 54–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar