Cover not available
Part of
Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts: From global to local discourses
Edited by Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 342] 2024
► pp. 39–61

Chapter 3
Self-reference as an argumentative tool

Discourse by politicians and experts during the Covid-19 pandemic

| Université catholique de Louvain
| University of Groningen
In this chapter, we analyse how politicians and experts from Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain involved in the Covid-19 crisis construct self-reference on Twitter (currently X), combining linguistic approaches to person reference and argumentation theory. On the one hand, we show that uses are fairly similar across the three countries, in spite of the considerable differences as to government measures concerning the pandemic. On the other hand, differences can be found between the different professional categories. Whereas politicians mainly use self-reference to build their ethos, the experts rather support the ethos of others. In showing how these uses contribute to building or employing ethos, we also demonstrate that these uses can ultimately be understood as having argumentative functions on Twitter.
Keywords: person reference, self-reference, Covid-19, Twitter (X), ethos, argumentation, pragmatics, discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background: Self-reference and argumentation
    • 2.1Self-reference
    • 2.2Ethos and argument
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Individual self-reference
    • 4.2Collective self-reference
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.342.03dec
References (27)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amossy, Ruth. 2001. “Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology.” Poetics Today 22: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristotle 1984. “Rhetorica” (translation: Roberts, W. Rhys). In The Works of Aristotle, ed. by Jonathan Barnes, II, 2152–2269. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Braet, Antoine C. 1992. “Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Re-Examination.” Argumentation 6: 307–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Alan. 1986. “Ēthotic Argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (3): 245–258.Google Scholar
Coesemans, Roel, and Barbara De Cock. 2017. “Self-Reference by Politicians on Twitter: Strategies to Adapt to 140 Characters.” Journal of Pragmatics 116: 37–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cougnon, Louise-Amélie, and Louis de Viron. 2021. “COVID-19 et communication de crise. Focus linguistique sur les tweets francophones de Belgique.” In La linguistique appliquée à l’ère digitale, Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, ed. by Alain Kambert, Maud Dubois, and Sara Cotelli Kureth. [URL].Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayter, Daria, 2014. “Self-Praise in Microblogging.” Journal of Pragmatics 61: 91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Barbara. 2010. “La funcionalidad discursiva del esquema construccional: Los españoles hemos hecho historia en Europa.” Lingüística Española Actual 32 (2): 173–195.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Why We Can Be You: The Use of 1st Person Plural Forms with Hearer Reference in English and Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2762–2775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Profiling Discourse Participants. Forms and Functions in Spanish Conversation and Debates (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series; 246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Barbara, and Sandrine Roginsky. 2015. “Identités discursives sur Twitter: construction de l’identité de député européen en période pré-électorale. Comparaison entre la France, l’Espagne et le Royaume-Uni.” In Communication électronique: enjeux, stratégies et opportunités, ed. by Fabien Liénard, and Sami Zlitni, 137–148. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
Deswert, Clémence. 2021. “The Praise for a ‘Caretaker’ Leader. Gendered Press Coverage of Prime Minister Sophie Wilmès in a COVID-19 Context.” Politics of the Low Countries 3 (2): 186–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nogué Serrano, Neus. 2008. La dixi de persona en català. Montserrat: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Parsons, Simon, et al. 2014. “Argument Schemes for Reasoning about Trust.” Argument and Computation 5: 160–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roginsky, Sandrine. 2015. “Les députés européens sur « Facebook » et « Twitter », une ethnographie des usages.” Communication et Langages: presse, television, radio, publicite, edition, graphisme, formation, sociologie 183: 83–109.Google Scholar
Roginsky, Sandrine, and Barbara De Cock. 2015. “Faire campagne sur Twitter. Modalités d’énonciation et mises en récit des candidats à l’élection européenne.” Les Cahiers du Numérique 11 (4): 119–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2000. Getting Acquainted in Conversation: A Study of Initial Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Laar, Jan Albert, and Barbara De Cock. 2022. “Argumentatie, zelfpromotie of beide? Een analyse van de tweets van nederlandstalige politici en experten over de covid19-pandemie.” Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 44 (3): 176–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1999. “Ethotic Arguments and Fallacies: The Credibility Function in Multi-Agent Dialogue Systems.” Pragmatics and Cognition 7: 177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Bernhard Forchtner. 2017. “Introducing the language-politics nexus.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Bernhard Forchtner, 1–14. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žmavc, Janja. 2012. “The Ethos of Classical Rhetoric: From Epieikeia to Auctoritas.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 181–191. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar