Cover not available
Part of
(Non)referentiality in Conversation
Edited by Michael C. Ewing and Ritva Laury
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 344] 2024
► pp. 1–10

Chapter 1
Toward the interactional relevance of (non)referentiality

 | University of Helsinki
 | University of Melbourne
 | University of California Santa Barbara
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prior research on referentiality
    • 2.1The early modern work of logicians
    • 2.2Reference in context
    • 2.3Reference in discourse
    • 2.4Interaction
  • 3.Key themes emerging from investigating reference in conversation
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 1 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.344.01lau
References (29)
References
Auer, Peter. 1984. “Referential Problems in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 8 (5–6): 627–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1966. “Reference and Definite Descriptions.” In Semantics, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits, 100–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1980. “Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse.” In: The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. by Wallace Chafe, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1991. Dimensions of a Theory of Information Flow. Unpublished Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. and Tanya Stivers, eds. 2007. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia and Barbara Fox. 1996. “Interactional Motivations for Reference Formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara Fox, 145–168. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1996. Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlieb. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1892): 25–50.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1978. “Definiteness and Referentiality.” In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4, Syntax, ed. by Joseph Greenberg, 292–330. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: Quantitative Cross-language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation.” Text 6 (3): 283–316.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1919. Le problème de l’article et sa solution dans la langue française. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.” Language 69: 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space Among the Maya. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. “The Indexical Ground of Deictic Reference.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 43–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Explorations in the Deictic Field. Current Anthropology 46 (2): 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1928. Principes de grammaire générale. Copenhagen: Bianco Lundo.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 1996. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: ‘Second Person’ Reference in Multi-Party Conversation.” Pragmatics 6 (3) 281–294.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. “Toward a Taxonomy of Given–New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind 14 (56): 479–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Some Practices of Referring to Persons in Talk in Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1958. “Proper Names.” Mind 67: 166–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith Basso and Henry Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. 1950. “On Referring.” Mind 59: 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar