Chapter 1
Toward the interactional relevance of (non)referentiality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Prior research on referentiality
- 2.1The early modern work of logicians
- 2.2Reference in context
- 2.3Reference in discourse
- 2.4Interaction
- 3.Key themes emerging from investigating reference in conversation
- 4.Conclusion
-
Note
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (29)
References
Auer, Peter. 1984. “Referential
Problems in Conversation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 8 (5–6): 627–648. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie.
Die Darstellungsfunktion der
Sprache. Jena: Fischer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse,
Consciousness, and Time: The flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and
Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donnellan, Keith. 1966. “Reference
and Definite
Descriptions.” In Semantics, ed.
by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits, 100–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 1980. “Beyond Definiteness:
The Trace of Identity in Discourse.” In: The Pear Stories:
Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed.
by Wallace Chafe, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1991. Dimensions
of a Theory of Information Flow. Unpublished
Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enfield, N. J. and Tanya Stivers, eds. 2007. Person
Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social
Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Discourse Structure and
Anaphora: Written and Conversational
English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frege, Gottlieb. 1892. “Über
Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische
Kritik 100 (1892): 25–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1978. “Definiteness
and Referentiality.” In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4,
Syntax, ed. by Joseph Greenberg, 292–330. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Audience
Diversity, Participation and
Interpretation.” Text 6 (3): 283–316.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guillaume, Gustave. 1919. Le
problème de l’article et sa solution dans la langue
française. Paris: Hachette.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive
Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in
Discourse.” Language 69: 274–307. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, William. 1990. Referential
Practice: Language and Lived Space Among the
Maya. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, William. 1992. “The
Indexical Ground of Deictic Reference.” In Rethinking
Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 43–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, William. 2005. Explorations
in the Deictic Field. Current
Anthropology 46 (2): 191–220. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1928. Principes
de grammaire générale. Copenhagen: Bianco Lundo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, Gene. 1996. “On
the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: ‘Second Person’ Reference in Multi-Party
Conversation.” Pragmatics 6 (3) 281–294.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen. 1981. “Toward
a Taxonomy of Given–New Information.” In Radical
Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. “On
Denoting.” Mind 14 (56): 479–493. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russell, Bertrand. 1919. Introduction
to Mathematical Philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two
Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their
Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in
Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1958. “Proper
Names.” Mind 67: 166–173. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters,
Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning
in Anthropology, ed. by Keith Basso and Henry Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strawson, Peter F. 1950. “On
Referring.” Mind 59: 320–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)