Evidentials and Relevance

ORCID logoElly Ifantidou | Athens University of Economics & Business
ISBN 9789027251053 (Eur) | EUR 105.00
ISBN 9781588110329 (USA) | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027297433 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
Google Play logo
This book uses Sperber and Wilson’s Relevance Theory to show how evidential expressions can be analysed in a unified semantic/pragmatic framework. The first part surveys general linguistic work on evidentials, presents speech-act theory and examines Grice’s theory of meaning and communication with emphasis on three main issues: for linguistically encoded evidentials, are they truth-conditional or non-truth-conditional, and do they contribute to explicit or implicit communication? For pragmatically inferred evidentials, is there a pragmatic framework in which they can be adequately accounted for? The second part examines those assumptions of Relevance theory that bear on the study of evidentials, offers an account of pragmatically inferred evidentials and introduces three distinctions relevant to the issues discussed in this book: between explicit and implicit communication, truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional meaning, and conceptual and procedural meaning. These distinctions are applied to a variety of linguistically encoded evidentials, including sentence adverbials, parenthetical constructions and hearsay particles. This book offers convincing evidence that not all evidentials behave similarly with respect to the above distinctions and offers an explanation for why this is so.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 86] 2001.  xii, 225 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 98 other publications

Abbas, Ali Haif
2019. Super-Hyperbolic Man: Hyperbole as an Ideological Discourse Strategy in Trump’s Speeches. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 32:2  pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Ahern, Aoife K., José Amenós-Pons & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2015. Metarepresentation and evidentiality in Spanish tense and mood. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Allott, Nicholas
2013. Relevance Theory. In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 2],  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Alonso Almeida, Francisco & Heather Adams
2012. SENTENTIAL EVIDENTIALS IN ENGLIHS MEDICAL RESEARCH PAPERS. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 7:1 DOI logo
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Mª Isabel González-Cruz
2012. Exploring Male and Female Voices through Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Some Modern English Travel Texts on the Canaries. Research in Language 10:3  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Andrus, Jennifer
2012. Language ideology, fractal recursivity, and discursive agency in the legal construction of linguistic evidence. Language in Society 41:5  pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Angelopoulos, Nikos, Dafni-Vaia Bagioka & Arhonto Terzi
2023. Exploring syntactically encoded evidentiality. Language Acquisition 30:1  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Bardière, Yves
2016. L’étrange cas de can épistémique. Lidil :53  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Bardzokas, Valandis
2019. Poly-procedural meaning and rhetoric. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:2-3  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Belyaeva-Standen, Yelena
2003. The functional–pragmatic field of possibility in Russian: meaning and structure. Language Sciences 25:3  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Blakemore, Diane
2007. Constraints, Concepts and Procedural Encoding. In Pragmatics,  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni & Andrzej Zuczkowski
2013. Certain-Uncertain, True-False, Good-Evil in Italian Political Speeches. In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688],  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Boulat, Kira
2015. Hearer-oriented processes of strength assignment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Boulat, Kira & Didier Maillat
2017. She Said You Said I Saw It with My Own Eyes: A Pragmatic Account of Commitment. In Formal Models in the Study of Language,  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Boulat, Kira & Didier Maillat
2023. Strength is relevant: experimental evidence of strength as a marker of commitment. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Bu, Jiemin
2014. Towards a pragmatic analysis of metadiscourse in academic lectures: From relevance to adaptation. Discourse Studies 16:4  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Cabedo Nebot, Adrián & Carolina Figueras Bates
2018. Chapter 1. Evidentiality in discourse. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Carston, Robyn
2010. Explicit Communication and ‘Free’ Pragmatic Enrichment. In Explicit Communication,  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Clift, Rebecca
2006. Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:5  pp. 569 ff. DOI logo
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
2014. Evidential and epistemic strategies in Romanian parliamentary debates. Language and Dialogue 4:1  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Cruz, Manuel Padilla
2019. Qualifying insults, offensive epithets, slurs and expressive expletives. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:2  pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2016. Three decades of relevance theory. In Relevance Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 268],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2018. Pragmatic Competence Injustice. Social Epistemology 32:3  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2020. Chapter 3. Evidential participles and epistemic vigilance. In Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8],  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2022. Ad hoc concepts, affective attitude and epistemic stance. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2024. Attacking epistemic personhood on Twitter/X. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2024. Irina T. Pandarova, Revisiting sentence adverbials and relevance (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 334). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2021. Pp. ix + 254. ISBN 9789027213730.. English Language and Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dendale, Patrick & Julie Van Bogaert
2012. Réflexions sur les critères de définition et les problèmes d'identification des marqueurs évidentiels en français. Langue française n°173:1  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Diaz, Maria Angela, Ken Lau & Chia-Yen Lin
2020. Pragmatic functions of I think in computer-mediated, cross-cultural communication between Taiwanese and Japanese undergraduate students. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:4  pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Dijk, Teun A. Van
2009. Texte, Contexte et Connaissance. Semen :27 DOI logo
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2009. Texte, Contexte et Connaissance. Semen :27  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Etter-Lewis, Gwendolyn
2006. The Sky is Falling. Journal of Black Studies 36:5  pp. 720 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2014. I think,I meanandI believein political discourse. Functions of Language 21:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Figueras Bates, Carolina
2019. Razonamiento y Vigilancia Epistémica: Una Explicación Relevantista de los Evidencialespor lo vistoyse ve que. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:1  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Frápolli, María José & Neftalí Villanueva
2012. Minimal Expressivism. Dialectica 66:4  pp. 471 ff. DOI logo
Furko, Peter
2017. Manipulative uses of pragmatic markers in political discourse. Palgrave Communications 3:1 DOI logo
Furkó, Bálint Péter
2015. From mediatized political discourse toThe Hobbit. Language and Dialogue 5:2  pp. 264 ff. DOI logo
Furkó, Péter B.
2020. Discourse Markers and Their Translation in Literary Discourse: A Case Study of Discourse-Pragmatic Devices in The Hobbit. In Discourse Markers and Beyond,  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Furkó, Péter B.
2020. Discourse Markers from a Critical Perspective: A Case Study of Discourse Markers in Parliamentary Speeches. In Discourse Markers and Beyond,  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Furkó, Péter B.
2020. Discourse Markers from a Critical Perspective: Some Theoretical Issues. In Discourse Markers and Beyond,  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
González, Montserrat, Paolo Roseano, Joan Borràs-Comes & Pilar Prieto
2017. Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua 186-187  pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Haßler, Gerda
2015. Evidentiality and the expression of speaker’s stance in Romance languages and German. Discourse Studies 17:2  pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
Holvoet, Axel & Jelena Konickaja
2011. Interpretive deontics: A definition and a semantic map based mainly on Slavonic and Baltic data. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 43:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hsieh, Chia-Ling
2008. Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports: subjectivity/objectivity as a factor. Discourse Studies 10:2  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Ifantidou, Elly & Lemonia Tsavdaridou
2023. Mirative evidentials, relevance and non‑propositional meaning. Pragmatics & Cognition 30:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Ionescu-Ruxandoiu, Liliana
2014. Strategic uses of certainty and uncertainty in a political debate. Language and Dialogue 4:1  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Jodłowiec, Maria
2021. Explicit Import Revisited: A Critical Appraisal of Explicatures. Studies in Polish Linguistics 16:6  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Kaili, Hasan, Aytac Celtek & Despina Papadopoulou
2016. The acquisition of TAM markers in L2 Turkish. In Second Language Acquisition of Turkish [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 59],  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Karmakar, Samir
2013. Contextualizing Time in Linguistic Discourse: Cues to Individuate and to Order Events. In Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8284],  pp. 806 ff. DOI logo
Keizer, Evelien
2020. Chapter 6. The semantics, syntax and prosody of adverbs in English. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70],  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Kostrova, Olga A
2014. Kinds of evidentiality in German complement clauses. In On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia [Studies in Language Companion Series, 164],  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Lubberger, Beate
2020. Chapter 5. Metarepresentation markers in Indus Kohistani. In Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Macagno, Fabrizio & Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto
2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Macagno, Fabrizio & Alessandro Capone
2016. Interpretative Disputes, Explicatures, and Argumentative Reasoning. Argumentation 30:4  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
2017. Communicative Intentions and Commitments. In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Maillat, Didier
2023. On the manifestness of assumptions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3  pp. 460 ff. DOI logo
McGregor, William B.
2008. Complementation as interpersonal grammar. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Philosophical Considerations. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa & Seyyed Ali Ostovar-Namaghi
2022. Metapragmatics in indirect reports. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:3  pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Morante, Roser & Caroline Sporleder
2012. Modality and Negation: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Computational Linguistics 38:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Murray, Sarah E.
2020. Evidentials. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nes, Anders
2016. Assertion, belief, and ‘I believe’-guarded affirmation. Linguistics and Philosophy 39:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Ozturk, Ozge & Anna Papafragou
2016. The Acquisition of Evidentiality and Source Monitoring. Language Learning and Development 12:2  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Piskorska, Agnieszka
2020. Introduction. In Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Reda, Ghsoon
2023. Evidential propositions as situational scenarios. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Sabet, Peyman G.P. & Grace Q. Zhang
2018. The Pragmatic Functions of ‘I Don't Think’ and ‘I Think + Not’. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:3  pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Kate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston
2019. Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, DOI logo
2010. Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language 25:4  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Sperber, Dan & Ira A. Noveck
2004. Introduction. In Experimental Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
2011. A Research on the Text Reliability Based on Evidentiality. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages 23:02  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Yi Xin & Qing You Yan
2014. The Application Mode of Energy Big Data and its Enlightenment for Power Grid Enterprises. Advanced Materials Research 1008-1009  pp. 1452 ff. DOI logo
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Jennifer Smith
2021. Obviously undergoing change: Adverbs of evidentiality across time and space. Language Variation and Change 33:1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
2016. Making a story make sense: Does evidentiality matter in discourse coherence?. Applied Psycholinguistics 37:6  pp. 1337 ff. DOI logo
Tseronis, Assimakis
2022. Use and abuse of the strategic function ofin factandfranklywhen qualifying a standpoint. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
2005. Underdeterminacy in Language (R. Carston, Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 22:2  pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Uchida, Seiji
2023. Metarepresentational phenomena in Japanese and English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3  pp. 436 ff. DOI logo
2010. A constructional taxonomy ofI thinkand related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14:3  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Van Bogaert, Julie & Torsten Leuschner
2015. Dutch ('t) schijnt and german scheint(')s: on the grammaticalization of evidential particles. Studia Linguistica 69:1  pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2004. Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. Journal of Pragmatics 36:3  pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Vanderbiesen, Jeroen
Walton, Douglas & Fabrizio Macagno
2019. Diagnosing Misattribution of Commitments: A Normative and Pragmatic Model of for Assessing Straw Man. In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Qian
2020. A corpus-based contrastive analysis ofI thinkin spoken Hong Kong English: Research from the International Corpus of English (ICE). Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Jingjing & Le Cheng
2020. Evidentiality of court judgments in the People’s Republic of China: A semiotic perspective. Semiotica 2020:236-237  pp. 477 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2003. Review of Noh (2000): Metarepresentation. A Relevance-theory Approach. Studies in Language 27:1  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Linxiu & Yu Tian
2015. A Cross-Disciplinary Study of Evidentiality in Abstracts of English Research Articles. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:04  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Yildiz, Mustafa & Ümit Deniz Turan
Zhang, Dian
2020. 2020 International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management (ICMEIM),  pp. 366 ff. DOI logo
Zubeldia, Larraitz
2013. (Non-)Determining the Original Speaker: Reportative Particles versus Verbs. Research in Language 11:2  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Zuczkowski, Andrzej
2014. Preface. Language and Dialogue 4:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2002. References. In Thoughts and Utterances,  pp. 384 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2006. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 742 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.




Main BIC Subject

CF: Linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2001035507 | Marc record