Introduction published In:
Cognitive Perspectives on Genre
Edited by Carla Vergaro
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3] 2018
► pp. 417429
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986The problem of speech genre. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer
(eds.) 2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin
1993Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 101. 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
2012Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition, Language 82(4). 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Paul J. Hopper
(eds.) 2001Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capra, Fritjof
2005Complexity and life. Theory, Culture and Society 22(5). 33–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Amy
2009Re-fusing form in genre study. In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre, 27–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1982Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Freadman, Aviva & Peter Medway
(eds.) 1994Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H.
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter J. Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harder, Peter
2010Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1987Emergent grammar. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyon, Sunny
1996Genre in three traditions. TESOL Quarterly 301. 693–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
2018Discourse analysis, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1984Active Zones. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 101. 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2000A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2001Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
2003Toward a theory of text complexity. In Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi (ed.), Complexity in language and text, 23–66. Pisa: Edizioni Plus.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn
1984Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 701. 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian
1995Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 241. 393–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2006Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. In Elvio Baccarini & Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (eds.), Rationality of belief and action, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.Google Scholar
2007Detto non detto: Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2012Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable: Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 239–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the pragmatic and social dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 543–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Ein integratives soziokognitives Modell des dynamischen Lexikons. In Stefan Engelberg, Henning Lobin, Kathryn Steyer & Sascha Wolfer (eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität, 215–231. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik
2015Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard
2011Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller & Astrid Lohöfer (eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences, 24–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stukker, Ninke, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen
(eds.) 2016Genre in language, discourse and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Five Graces Group
(Clay Bleckner, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, Tom Schoenemann) 2009Language is a complex-adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(1). 1–26.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
2003 [1958]The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1967 [1953]Ricerche filosofiche. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Tseng, Ming-Yu
2021. Toward a cognitive-pragmatic account of metonymic schemes of thought: Examples from online medical consultation. Journal of Pragmatics 173  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang
2022. Conceptual metonymy and emotive-affective meaning at the interface: Examples from online medical consultations. Lingua 268  pp. 103192 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.