Introduction
Cognitive perspectives on genre
Article outline
- 1.On genre and cognition
- 2.The contributions to this special issue
- 3.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
This article is available free of charge.
References (39)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. The problem of speech genre. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 101. 475–509. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2012. Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition, Language 82(4). 711–733. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Capra, Fritjof. 2005. Complexity and life. Theory, Culture and Society 22(5). 33–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Devitt, Amy. 2009. Re-fusing form in genre study. In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre, 27–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freadman, Aviva & Peter Medway (eds.). 1994. Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter J. Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyon, Sunny. 1996. Genre in three traditions. TESOL Quarterly 301. 693–722. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnstone, Barbara. 2018. Discourse analysis, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1984. Active Zones. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 101. 172–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 2003. Toward a theory of text complexity. In Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi (ed.), Complexity in language and text, 23–66. Pisa: Edizioni Plus.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 701. 151–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paltridge, Brian. 1995. Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 241. 393–406. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sbisà, Marina. 2006. Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. In Elvio Baccarini & Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (eds.), Rationality of belief and action, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sbisà, Marina. 2007. Detto non detto: Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2012. Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable: Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2014. Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 239–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the pragmatic and social dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 543–557. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2017. A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2018. Ein integratives soziokognitives Modell des dynamischen Lexikons. In Stefan Engelberg, Henning Lobin, Kathryn Steyer & Sascha Wolfer (eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität, 215–231. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik. 2015. Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stukker, Ninke, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen (eds.). 2016. Genre in language, discourse and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
The Five Graces Group (Clay Bleckner, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, Tom Schoenemann). 2009. Language is a complex-adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(1). 1–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toulmin, Stephen. 2003 [1958]. The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1967 [1953]. Ricerche filosofiche. Torino: Einaudi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang
2022.
Conceptual metonymy and emotive-affective meaning at the interface: Examples from online medical consultations.
Lingua 268
► pp. 103192 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Tseng, Ming-Yu
2021.
Toward a cognitive-pragmatic account of metonymic schemes of thought: Examples from online medical consultation.
Journal of Pragmatics 173
► pp. 177 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.