Review published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 17:2 (2009) ► pp.450457
References (26)
References
Beardsley, M. C. 1958. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York and Burlingame: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Brône, G. and Vandaele, J. (eds). 2009. Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains, and Gaps. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. and Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. 2005. The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. 2006. “The aesthetic faculty”. In M. Turner (ed), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, E. M. 1962. Aspects of the Novel. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. H. 1998. “Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a theory of cognitive poetics”. In A. Barcelona (ed), Metaphor & Metonymy at the Crossroads. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 253–281.Google Scholar
2007. “Poetic iconicity”. In W. Chłopicki, A. Pawelec, and A. Pojoska (eds), Cognition in Language: Volume in Honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska. Kraków: Tertium, 472–501.Google Scholar
2008. “Revisiting/revisioning the icon through metaphor”. Poetics Today 29(2): 353–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frijda, H. N., Manstead, A. S. R., and Bem, S. (eds). 2000. Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. and Steen, G. (eds). 2003. Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. and Keyser, S. J. 1966. “Chaucer and the study of prosody”. College English 281: 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogan, P. C. 2003. Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1993. “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. 2006. Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Semino, E. and Culpeper, J. 2002. Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, E. 1993. Gaps in Nature: Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008. “Cartographies of cognitive poetics”. Pragmatics & Cognition 16(3): 587–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. 2006. “Whose rhyme is whose reason?: Sound and sense in Cyrano de Bergerac. Language and Literature 15(1): 29–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabakowska, E. 1993. Cognitive Linguistics and Poetics of Translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Tsur, R. 1992. Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(ed). 2006. The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellek, R. and Warren, A. 1956. Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Revutskaya, Alena
2023. Review of Rasse (2022): Poetic Metaphors: Creativity and Interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Orlova, Iryna
2014. Poética Cognitiva y Traducción: análisis de las traducciones de J.L.Borges al ucraniano e inglés. Mutatis Mutandis. Revista Latinoamericana de Traducción 7:2  pp. 350 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.