Article published In:
Cognitive Perspectives on Genre
Edited by Carla Vergaro
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3] 2018
► pp. 459482
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015Constructing learning as a complex adaptive system: Psycholinguistic evidence from L2 learners of English. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986The problem of speech genre. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe & Joanna Bybee
2009Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 591. 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella
2003Cognitive complexity and the lexicon. In Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi (ed.), Complexity in language and text, 67–116. Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar
2018Irony as a complex attitude. Lingue e Linguaggi 261. 59–80.Google Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella & Alessandro Lenci
2007Lexical complexity and the texture of meaning. In Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, Gloria Cappelli & Silvia Masi (eds.), Lexical complexity: Theoretical assessment and translational perspectives, 15–33. Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27(1) 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Daniel
1997An introduction to genre theory. [URL] (28 January 2019).
Dryden, John
1693Discourse Concerning the Original and Progress of Satire. In A. B. Chambers, William Frost, and Vinton A. Dearing (eds.) 1974, The works of John Dryden, vol. 4: Poems 1693–1696, 3–90. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick & Diane Larsen-Freeman
(eds.) 2006Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the Special Issue. Applied Linguistics 27(4). 558–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fife, Jane
2016Peeling The Onion: Satire and the complexity of audience responses. Rhetoric Review 35(4). 322–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, Monika
1996Towards a natural narratology. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Genres, text types or discourse modes? Style 34(2). 274–292.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair
1982Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1989Genre. In Erik Barnouw (ed.), International encyclopedia of communications, vol. 21, 215–17. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Northorp
1957The anatomy of criticism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond & Herbert Colston
2012Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Dustin
1994Satire: A critical reintroduction. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1988Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, 155–175. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. Scott, Narayanan Srinivasan & Cees van Leeuwen
(eds.) 2015The role of complex systems theory in cognitive science. Cognitive Processing 16(4). 16–315. Special Issue on Complexity in Brain and Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J. & Richard M. Roberts
1993On satire and parody: The importance of being ironic. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 8(2). 97–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuyper, Kathleen
(ed.) 2012Prose literary terms and concepts. Britannica Guide to Literary Elements, New York: Britannica Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Koenraad
1984The nature of satire. Poetics 13(6). 459–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly
2011Genres and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1). 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
1997Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 181. 141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Complex dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching 45(2). 202–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Lynne Cameron
2008Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E.
1983The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
(ed.) 2003Complexity in language and text. Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar
Paltridge, Brian
1995Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 24(4). 393–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, Kerry L. & Raymond Gibbs
1997Authorial intentions in understanding satirical texts. Poetics 25(1). 45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, David
2005Frame shifting in humour and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 20(4). 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4(3). 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Michael & Carolyn Watters
1998The evolution of cybergenres. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 21, 97–109. Hawaii.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul
2003On the discourse of satire. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deidre Wilson
[1986]1995Relevance theory. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stam, Robert
2000Film theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard
2011Genre between the humanities and the science. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller & Astrid Lohoefer (eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive science: Examining the interdisciplinary potential of cognitive approaches in linguistics and literary studies, 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stukker, Ninke, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen
2016Genre in language, discourse and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The Onion
2006 “Poverty-stricken Africans receive desperately needed Bibles” 421:11.Google Scholar
Tsiplakou, Stavroula & Georgios Floros
2013Never mind the text type, here’s textual force: Towards a pragmatic reconceptualization of text types. Journal of Pragmatics 45(1). 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark
1994Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tunja
1992Issues of text typology. Narrative – a “basic”type of text? Text 12(2). 293–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werlich, Egon
1976A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle&Meyer.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deidre & Dan Sperber
2012Explaining irony. In Deidre Wilson and Dan Sperber (eds.), Meaning and Relevance, 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2016Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics and Cognition 23(1). 92–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar