Article published In:
Cognitive Perspectives on Genre
Edited by Carla Vergaro
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3] 2018
► pp. 602630
Amossy, Ruth
2005The argumentative dimension of discourse. In Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (eds.), Practices of argumentation, 87–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic 29(3). 252–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antelmi, Donatella & Francesca Santulli
2012Arbitration awards in Italy: Some argumentative features in the discourse analytical perspective. In Vijay Bhatia, Giulia Garzone & Chiara Degano (eds.), Arbitration awards: Generic features and textual realisations, 91–108. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Beaugrande, Robert de & Wolfgang U. Dressler
1981Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay
1987Textual-mapping in British legislative writing. World Englishes. 6(1). 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Analysing genre-language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay, Giulia Garzone & Chiara Degano
(eds.) 2012Arbitration awards: Generic features and textual realisations. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1989A typology of English texts. Linguistics. 27(1). 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Robert Grootendorst
1984Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Eric C. W. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. Wagemans
2014Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Robert Grootendorst & Tjark Kruiger
1984The study of argumentation. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Freeman, James B.
2001Argument structure and disciplinary perspective. Argumentation. 15(14). 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Argument structure: Representation and theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas & Joseph Courtés
1979Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la theorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H.
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter J. Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 31, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in P. Grice 1989 Studies in the ways of words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1991The conception of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil & Ian Mason
1990Discourse and the translator. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, David
2017On reasoning and argument: Essays in informal logic and critical thinking. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Ralph H.
2000Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercier, Hugo & Dan Sperber
2011Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 34(22). 57–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn
1984Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 70(2). 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santulli, Francesca
2008La sentenza come genere testuale: Narrazione, argomentazione, performatività. In Giuliana Garzone & Francesca Santulli (eds.), Il linguaggio giuridico: prospettive interdisciplinari, 207–238. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
1989Linguaggio, ragione, interazione: Per una pragmatica degli atti linguistici. Bologna: Il Mulino; second digital edition by Edizioni Università di Trieste 2009.Google Scholar
2002Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences. In Anita Fetzer & Christiane Meierkord (eds.), Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. In Elvio Baccarini & Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (eds.), Rationality of belief and action, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.Google Scholar
2007aOn argumentative rationality. Anthropology & Philosophy. 8(1/2). 89–99.Google Scholar
2007bDetto non detto: Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
2018Philosophical pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker, ‎Klaus P. Schneider & ‎Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Methods in pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 10), 133–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
2003The uses of argument. Updated edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First edition 1958 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna
(ed.) 1997Text typology: Register, genre and text type. In Anna Trosborg (ed.), Text Typology and Translation, 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas
1998The New Dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werlich, Egon
1983A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Caponetto, Laura & Paolo Labinaz
2023. Marina Sbisà’s Deontic Approach to Speech Actions. In Sbisà on Speech as Action [Philosophers in Depth, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cimmino, Doriana & Federica Cominetti
2023. Italian davvero (‘really’) as a trigger of implicit contents in persuasive discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 211  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Sbisà, Marina
2021. Presupposition and implicature: Varieties of implicit meaning in explicitation practices. Journal of Pragmatics 182  pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Secades Gómez, Alejandro
2022. Modal Qualification and the Speech-Act of Arguing in LNMA: Practical Aspects and a Theoretical Issue. Argumentation 36:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.