The aim of this paper is to explore the status of argumentative discourse. We argue that argumentation can contribute to instances of different discourse genres, regardless of whether it is functional to their purposes. By analyzing examples from the daily press in the light of an approach to discourse analysis inspired by pragmatics, we show that also texts that are not expected to be argumentative have underlying argumentative structures and that a text’s being argumentative is a matter of degree: the understanding of underlying argumentative structures contributes to a varying extent to the understanding of what a text as a whole means and of its point in the speech situation. This role of argumentative structures in text understanding suggests considering argumentation as a cognitively-based dimension of discourse, connected to human rationality.
2009Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic 29(3). 252–267.
Antelmi, Donatella & Francesca Santulli
2012Arbitration awards in Italy: Some argumentative features in the discourse analytical perspective. In Vijay Bhatia, Giulia Garzone & Chiara Degano (eds.), Arbitration awards: Generic features and textual realisations, 91–108. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Beaugrande, Robert de & Wolfgang U. Dressler
1981Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
Bhatia, Vijay
1987Textual-mapping in British legislative writing. World Englishes. 6(1). 1–10.
Bhatia, Vijay
1993Analysing genre-language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, Vijay
2004Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Bhatia, Vijay, Giulia Garzone & Chiara Degano
(eds.)2012Arbitration awards: Generic features and textual realisations. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Biber, Douglas
1989A typology of English texts. Linguistics. 27(1). 3–43.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Robert Grootendorst
1984Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Robert Grootendorst
2004A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Eric C. W. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. Wagemans
2014Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Robert Grootendorst & Tjark Kruiger
1984The study of argumentation. New York: Irvington.
Freeman, James B.
2001Argument structure and disciplinary perspective. Argumentation. 15(14). 397–423.
Freeman, James B.
2011Argument structure: Representation and theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
Greimas, Algirdas & Joseph Courtés
1979Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la theorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.
Grice, Paul H.
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter J. Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 31, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in P. Grice 1989 Studies in the ways of words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, Paul H.
1991The conception of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hatim, Basil & Ian Mason
1990Discourse and the translator. London: Longman.
Hitchcock, David
2017On reasoning and argument: Essays in informal logic and critical thinking. Dordrecht: Springer.
Johnson, Ralph H.
2000Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mercier, Hugo & Dan Sperber
2011Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 34(22). 57–74.
Miller, Carolyn
1984Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 70(2). 151–167.
Santulli, Francesca
2008La sentenza come genere testuale: Narrazione, argomentazione, performatività. In Giuliana Garzone & Francesca Santulli (eds.), Il linguaggio giuridico: prospettive interdisciplinari, 207–238. Milano: Giuffrè.
Sbisà, Marina
1989Linguaggio, ragione, interazione: Per una pragmatica degli atti linguistici. Bologna: Il Mulino; second digital edition by Edizioni Università di Trieste 2009.
Sbisà, Marina
2002Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences. In Anita Fetzer & Christiane Meierkord (eds.), Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sbisà, Marina
2006Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. In Elvio Baccarini & Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (eds.), Rationality of belief and action, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
2007bDetto non detto: Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Sbisà, Marina
2018Philosophical pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Methods in pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 10), 133–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Toulmin, Stephen
2003The uses of argument. Updated edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First edition 1958
1998The New Dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Werlich, Egon
1983A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Caponetto, Laura & Paolo Labinaz
2023. Marina Sbisà’s Deontic Approach to Speech Actions. In Sbisà on Speech as Action [Philosophers in Depth, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Cimmino, Doriana & Federica Cominetti
2023. Italian davvero (‘really’) as a trigger of implicit contents in persuasive discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 211 ► pp. 84 ff.
Sbisà, Marina
2021. Presupposition and implicature: Varieties of implicit meaning in explicitation practices. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 176 ff.
Secades Gómez, Alejandro
2022. Modal Qualification and the Speech-Act of Arguing in LNMA: Practical Aspects and a Theoretical Issue. Argumentation 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.