Article published In:
New Developments in Relevance Theory
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 321346
Anderson, Michael
2010Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 331: 245–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bambini, Valentina, Chiara Bertini, Walter Schaeken, Alessandra Stella and Francesco di Russo
2016Disentangling metaphor from context: an ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon
1995Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence
1999Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (22): 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Grounded cognition: past, present and future. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (22): 577–660.Google Scholar
Bergquist, Patricia
1974Phylum porifera. In Textbook of zoology invertebrates, 7th ed., ed. by Marshall, Andrew J. and Vale William Williams, 76–103. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne
2001Metaphor and what is said: a defense of a direct expression view of metaphor, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 1: 156–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, Max
1955Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 55 (19): 273–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2011On the descriptive ineffability of expressive meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14): 3537–3550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, Ned
1983Mental pictures and cognitive science. The Philosophical Review 93, Vol. 4 1: 499–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, Jack & Sandra Vehrencamp
1998Principles of animal communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Byrne, Richard & Andrew Whiten
eds. 1988Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Elizabeth
2006Metaphor and that certain ‘je ne sais quoi’. Philosophical Studies, 129 1: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese 165 (3):321-345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Metaphor: ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1101: 295–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Figurative language, mental imagery and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol: 198–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cave, Terence & Deirdre Wilson
2018Reading beyond the code: literature and relevance theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheney, Dorothy & Robert Seyfarth
1990How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy
1999An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (9): 345–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, Robin George
1938The principles of art. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, Louis & Tim Wharton
2021Before meaning: creature construction, sea-sponges, lizards and Humean projection. In Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure & Tim Wharton (eds.) Beyond meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
1994Descartes Error. Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1978What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5 (1): 31–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel
1978Beliefs about beliefs. Behavior and Brain Sciences 4 1: 568–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981Brainstorms: philosophical aims on mind and psychology. MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deplanque, Sylvie & David Sander
2021A fascinating but risky case of reverse inference: From measures to emotions! Food Quality and Preferences. Volume 921. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe
2013Appraisal theory: old and new questions. Emotion Review: 125–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabb, Nigel
2021Experiences of ineffable significance. In Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure & Wharton (eds.) Beyond meaning, 135–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fridland, E. R.
2015Skill, non-propositional thought, and the cognitive penetrability of perception. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 461: 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genovesi, Chris
2020Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Ray
1994The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics. 341: 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam
2008How metaphors create categories – quickly. Gibbs, Raymond (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golding, Alexandra
2016Metaphor in the embodied mind: beyond the propositionality of figurative language. PhD thesis. University of Brighton.
Goleman, Daniel
1995Emotional intelligence, New York, Bantam Books Inc.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1957Meaning. Philosophical Review 661: 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975aLogic and conversation. In Cole, P. and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press: 41–58.Google Scholar
1975bMethod in philosophical psychology (from the Banal to the Bizarre). Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 481: 23–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982Meaning revisited. In Smith, Neil (ed.) Mutual knowledge. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernest-August
2013How does the affective relate to ostensive-inferential communication? Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, John Cacioppo & Richard Rapson
1994Emotional contagion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc
1996The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Nicholas
1984Consciousness regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huron, David
2006Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David
1999What is meaning? Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. Ms.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
2003Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Alan
1994ToMM, ToBY and Agency: core architecture and domain-specificity. In Hirschfeld, Lawrence & Susan Gelman. eds. Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 119–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Mark
2000Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin 1261: 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepore, Ernie & Matthew Stone
2010Against Metaphorical Meaning. Topoi 29 (2): 165–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolaiti, Patricia
2019The limits of expression: language, literature, mind. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press a. From a poetics of language to a poetics of action: literature and art as a cognitive object. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
in press b. Perceptual relevance and art: some tentative suggestions. Journal of Literary Semantics 49: 2. DOI logo
Longhitano, Sabina
2014Communicating the ineffable: A pragmatic account of literariness. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences. Vol. 1581: 187–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinich, Aloysius
1984A theory for metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics 13(1): 35–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGinn, Colin
2004Mindsight. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Michaels, Anne
1991Miner’s Pond: poems. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
1992Unseen formations. Open Letter 8.41: 96–99.Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2009Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication? Social Science Information 48(3): 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moors, Agnes, Phoebe Ellsworth, Klaus Scherer & Nico Frijda
2013Appraisal theories of emotion: state of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 51: 119–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neale, Stephen
1992Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15.51: 509–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, Andrew
1975Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory 251: 45–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2009aTowards an alternative relevance-theoretic approach to interjections. International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 182–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bMight interjections encode concepts? More questions than answers. Łodź Papers in Pragmatics 5 (2): 241–270.Google Scholar
Pignocchi, Alessandro
2012History and intentions in the experience of artworks. Topoi 331: 477–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, Adrian
2000Poetic effects: a relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piskorska, Agnieszka
2012Cognition and emotions–a joint effort at obtaining positive cognitive effects? In Relevance studies in Poland, Vol. 4. Essays on language and communication. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press: 102–111.Google Scholar
2016Perlocutionary effects and relevance theory. In Padilla Cruz, Manuel (ed.), Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions, 287–305. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
2007aThe expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33 ( 2 ): 165–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007bThe centrality of expressive indices. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 255–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proust, Marcel
1922–1931À la recherche du temps erdu. In search of lost time, translated by Scott-Moncrieff, Charles Kenneth, Terence Kilmartin & Andreas Mayor (Vol. 71). Revised by D. J. Enright. London: Chatto and Windus, New York: The Modern Library 1992 Based on the French La Pléiade edition (1987–89).Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Zenon
1973What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80 ( 1 ): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur, & William Hirstein
1999The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 61: 15–51.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
1993Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges
1981Introduction: What are mental images? In Block, Ned (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology: 117–127. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1980Functionalism and the emotions. In Rorty, Amélie (ed.) Explaining emotions, 163–198. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sander, David, Jordan Grafman & Tiziana Zalla
2003The human amygdala: an evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 14 (4): 303–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis & Peter Schulz
2009Subjectivity out of irony. Semiotica (173): 397–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis & Wharton
2020Relevance, effect and affect. International Review of Pragmatics, John Benjamin: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schooler, Jonathan & Joseph Melcher, J.
1994The ineffability of insight. In Smith, Steven, Thomas Ward, & Ronald Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 97–133.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan
1996Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Oliver Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi & Deirdre Wilson
2010Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language 251: 359–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition (1st and 2nd eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy XV (44): 117–149.Google Scholar
1998The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In Carruthers, Peter & Jill Boucher. (eds.), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, 184–200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008A deflationary account of metaphors. In Gibbs, Ray. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, p. 84–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason
2011Know how. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tendahl, Markus & Raymond Gibbs
2008Complementary perspectives on metaphor: cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1823–1864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Coupling of metaphoric cognition and communication: a reply to Deirdre Wilson. Intercultural Pragmatics 8–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo
1897What is art? (translated by Pevear, Richard & Larissa Volokhonsky 1995) Hanworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Melinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne & Henrike Moll
2005Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 281: 675 – 691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tooby, John & Leda Cosmides
2008The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Handbook of Emotions, 3rd ed., ed. by Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, and Lisa Feldman Barrett: 114–137. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael
2004On the non-conceptual content of experience. In Reicher, Marie & Johan Marek (eds.), Experience and Analysis: Papers of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium, 221–239. Vienna: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2003aInterjections, language and the ‘showing’/‘saying’ continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition. Vol. 11–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003bNatural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind and Language Volume 18, No. 5: 447–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited. Lingua. 175–176: 20–35.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim & Claudia Strey
2019Slave to the passions: making emotions relevant. In Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation, ed. by Robyn Carston, Billy Clark, and Kate Scott, 253–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Tim, Constant Bonard, Daniel Dukes, David Sander & Steve Oswald
2021Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics, 1811: 259–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2011Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Intercultural Studies. 8–21: 177–196.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
2019Pragmatics and the challenge of non-propositional effects. Journal of Pragmatics 1451: 31–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2018Relevance theory and literary interpretation. In Cave, T. & Wilson, D. (eds.) Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, 185–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco (Paco)
2016Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition 23(1): 92–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Ifantidou, Elly
2023. Newspaper headlines, relevance and emotive effects. Journal of Pragmatics 218  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Strassheim, Jan
2022. Relevance as the Moving Ground of Semiosis. Philosophies 7:5  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2023. Beyond Humour: Relevant Affective Effects. In Pragmatics of Internet Humour,  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.