Article published In:
Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 195221
Aijmer, Karin
2013Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2006Pragmatic markers in contrast. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2007A politeness-theoretic approach to pragmatico-semantic change. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(1). 69–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Semantic change: Evidence from false friends. Languages in Contrast 10(2). 139–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Alors/donc/then at the right periphery: Seeking confirmation of an inference. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(2). 208–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Heike
2006The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(1–3). 2–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, Anna Kisiel & Wiltrud Mihatsch
2022Type noun constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Buysse, Lieven
2020‘It was a bit stressy as well actually’: The pragmatic markers actually and in fact in spoken learner English. Journal of Pragmatics 1561. 28–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V.
2018Conversation and language acquisition: A pragmatic approach. Language Learning and Development 14(3). 170–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
2001Meaning in interaction: The case of actually . Language 77(2). 245–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine & Liesbeth Degand
2019Domains and functions: A two-dimensional account of discourse markers. Discours 241. 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Defour, Tine, Ulrique D’Hondt, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen & Dominique Willems
2010b In fact, en fait, de fait, au fait: A contrastive study of the synchronic correspondences and diachronic development of English and French cognates. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 111(4). 433–463.Google Scholar
Demuth, Katherine & Annie Tremblay
2008Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language 351. 99–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Hondt, Ulrique
Didirková, Ivana, Ludivine Crible & Anne Catherine Simon
2019Impact of prosody on the perception and interpretation of discourse relations: Studies on et and alors in spoken French. Discourse Processes 56(8). 619–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green, M.
2006Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Ted Sanders
2008The emergence of Dutch and English connectives: How cumulative complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language 361. 829–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W.
1994The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grassman, Susanne
2014The pragmatics of word learning. In Danielle Matthews (ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, 139–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul
1996Children, adolescents and language change. Language Variation and Change 8(2). 117–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinhans, Janine, Mireia Farrús, Agustín Gravano, Juan Manuel Pérez, Catherine Lai & Leo Wanner
2017Using prosody to classify discourse relations. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2017, 3201–3205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyratzis, Amy & Susan Ervin-Tripp
1999The development of discourse markers in peer interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 311. 1321–1338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Levey, Stephen
2016The role of children in the propagation of discourse-pragmatic change: Insights from the acquisition of quotative variation. In Pichler, Heike (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights, 160–180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, Elena, Dorothé Salomo & Michael Tomasello
2009Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3). 481–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, Aliyah & Christophe Parisse
2007Codage et interprétation du langage spontané d’enfants de 1 à 3 ans. Corpus 61. 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortier, Liesbeth & Liesbeth Degand
2009Adversative discourse markers in contrast: The need for a combined corpus approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 141. 338–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone
Papafragou, Anna
2018Pragmatic development. Language Learning and Development 14(3). 167–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike
(ed.) 2016Discourse-pragmatic variation and change: New methods and insights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pouscoulous, Nausicaa
2014The ‘elevator’s buttocks’: Metaphorical abilities in children. In Danielle Matthews (ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, 239–259. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. & Elizabeth Claus Traugott
2000Invoking scalarity: The development of in fact . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1). 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
2004From ontogenesis to phylogenesis: What can child language tell us about language evolution? In Sue Taylor Parker, Jonas Langer & Constance Milbrath (eds.), Biology and knowledge revisited. From neurogenesis to psychogenesis, 255–286. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sprott, Richard A.
1992Children’s use of discourse markers in disputes: Form-function relations and discourse in child language. Discourse Processes 151, 423–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Gemma & Danielle Matthews
2014The communicative infant from 0–18 months: The social-cognitive foundations of pragmatic development. In Danielle Matthews (ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, 13–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, Anna, Elena Lieven, Julian Pine & Caroline Rowland
2001The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language 281. 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Claus
1982From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winifred P. Lehmann & Yael Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uno, Mariko
2016A usage-based approach to early-discourse pragmatic functions of the Japanese subject markers wa and ga . Journal of Child Language 431. 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Veen, Rosie, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted Sanders & Huub van den Bergh
2009Parental input and connective acquisition. First Language 29(3). 266–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waters, Cathleen
2016Practical strategies for elucidating discourse-pragmatic variation. In Pichler, Heike (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights, 41–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, C. Gordon
1981Learning through interaction: The study of language development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zufferey, Sandrine
2010Lexical pragmatics and theory of mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar