Commentary published In:
Pedagogical LinguisticsVol. 3:2 (2022) ► pp.174–180
Commentary
A tripod for a solid ground
A comment on Gilquin 2022
References (21)
DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
17
(3), 379–410. 
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
27
(2), 305–352.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
27
(2), 141–172.
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilquin, G. (2021). Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data-driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
31
(2), 229–247.
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,
9
(1), 97–129.
Hirata, Y., & Thompson, P. (2021). Communicative data-driven learning: a two-year pilot study. ELT Journal. ,
in press
.
,
in press
.Jäschke, K., & Plag, I. (2016). The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
38
(3), 485–521.
Jenset, G. B., McGillivray, B., & Rundell, M. (2018). The dative alternation revisited. Fresh insights from contemporary British spoken data. In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus approaches to contemporary British speech. Sociolinguistic studies of the spoken BNC2014 (pp. 185–208). Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle.
Lin, M. H. (2021). Effects of data-driven learning on college students of different grammar proficiencies: A preliminary empirical assessment in EFL classes. SAGE Open Journal, online, 1–15.
Lo, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies,
1
(1), 7–22.
Llopis-García, R. (2010). Why cognitive grammar works in the classroom. A case study of mood selection in Spanish. AILA Review,
23
(1), 72–94.
Madlener, K. (2015). Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 291. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Nassaji, H. (2017). Grammar acquisition. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed language acquisition (pp. 205–223). New York: Routledge.
Ott, G. (2017). Exploring Variation Theory in form-focused language teaching. Teaching the present perfect in upper secondary EFL. CELT Matters (Centre for English Language Teaching), 11, 9–29. [URL]
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
6
(11), 456–474.
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics,
33
(4), 829–856.
VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals,
26
(4), 435–450.
Wu, M. J., & Ionin, T. (2021). Does explicit instruction affect L2 linguistic competence? An examination with L2 acquisition of English inverse scope. Second Language Research,
1
(31), online.