Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 31:1 (2021) ► pp.62–86

Alternative questions and their responses in English interaction

ORCID logo | Saginaw Valley State University
This conversation analytic study investigates the sequential organization and question constraints of alternative questions in English with a focus on response formats. Building on research on polar and wh-questions (among others, Enfield, Stivers and Levinson 2010; Raymond 2003; Thompson, Fox and Couper-Kuhlen 2015), this article shows that responses to alternative questions that include a repeat of one of the alternatives are type-conforming, those that do not are nonconforming. Additionally, even though the concept of contiguity (Sacks 1973/1987) might suggest that the second alternative be confirmed, participants confirm either alternative unproblematically. Finally, my work shows that alternative questions can create difficulties for action ascription, because as they are being produced, they often resemble polar questions. My study adds to our understanding of question-answer sequences in English by providing an overview of an understudied question type in English. The data are in American English.
Keywords: alternative questions, type-conformity, question constraints, grammar in interaction, action ascription
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prior work on question-answer sequences
  • 3.Prior Research on alternative questions
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Response type 1: Repeat responses
    • 5.2Response type 2: Third alternative responses
    • 5.3AQs and action ascription
  • 6.Concluding discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 6 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19011.dra
References (94)
References
Alvanoudi, Angeliki. 2019. “‘May I tell you Something?’: When Questions do not Anticipate Responses.” Text and Talk 39 (4): 563–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, and Michelle O’Reilly. 2014. “Either/or Questions in Child Psychiatric Assessments: The Effect of the Seriousness and Order of the Alternatives.” Discourse Studies 16 (3): 327–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne A. 1993. “Transitional Regularities for ‘Casual’ “Okay” Usages.” Journal of Pragmatics 19 (4): 325–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. “Preserving and Constraining Alternatives: ‘Okays’ and ‘Official’ Priorities in Medical Interviews.” In The Talk of the Clinic: Explorations in the Analysis of Medical and Therapeutic Discourse, ed. by George H. Morris, and Ronald J. Chenail, 259–289. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Betz, Emma, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2018. “Indexing Priority of Position: Eben as Response Particle in German.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51 (2): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Blöndal, Þórunn. 2008. “Turn-final eða (‘or’) in Spoken Icelandic.” In Språk och Interaction 1, ed. by Jan Lindström, 151–168. Institutionen för nordiska språk och nordisk litteratus vid Helsingfors universitet.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina B. 2009. “Beyond Answering: Repeat-prefaced Responses in Conversation.” Communication Monographs 76 (2): 121–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “A Simple da?: Affirming Responses to Polar Questions in Russian Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 1001: 40–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. “Yes-no Questions Are not Alternative Questions.” In Questions, ed. by Henry Hiz, 87–110. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1996. “The Prosody of Repetition: On Quoting and Mimicry.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margaret Selting, 366–405. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Some Truths and Untruths about Final Intonation in Conversational Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 123–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margaret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curl, Tracy S. 2005. “Practices in Other-initiated Repair Resolution: The Phonetic Differentiation of ‘Repetitions’.” Discourse Processes 39 (1): 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Tracy S., John Local, and Gareth Walker. 2006. “Repetition and the Prosody-pragmatics Interface.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1721–1751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, Jan P. 2012. Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drake, Veronika. 2015. “Indexing Uncertainty: The Case of Turn-final or ”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (3): 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “German Questions and Turn-final oder.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 171: 168–195.Google Scholar
Drake, Veronika, Andrea Golato, and Peter Golato. 2019. Or not-questions in German, French, and English. Paper presented at the National Communication Association annual conference. Baltimore.
Egbert, Maria, and Monika Vöge. 2008. “ Wh-interrogative Formats used for Questioning and beyond: German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English why .” Discourse Studies 10 (1): 17–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Maria, Andrea Golato, and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2009. “Repairing Reference.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 104–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., and Jack Sidnell. 2015. “Language Structure and Social Agency: Confirming Polar Questions in Conversation.” Linguistics Vanguard 1 (1): 131–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question–response Sequences in Conversation across ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2615–2619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson. 2010. “Responses to Wh-questions in English Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (10): 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2012. “Question Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Andriela Rääbis, and Kirsi Laanesoo. 2017. “Polar Questions, Social Actions and Epistemic Stance.” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70 (3): 523–545.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Questioning in Medicine.” In “Why do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012a. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Well-prefaced Turns in English Conversation: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 881: 88–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and J. Maxwell Atkinson. 1984. “Introduction.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 1–15. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. De Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Sally. 2016. “Answering Questions instead of Telling Stories: Everyday Breaching in a Family Meal.” Journal of Pragmatics 1021: 54–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984a. “Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset.” In Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. by Valentina D’Urso, 11–38. Padua, Cleup.Google Scholar
. 1984b. “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. “Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset.” Human Studies 9 (2): 153–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2018. “Language and Bodily Resources: ‘Response Packages’ in Response to Polar Questions in English.” Journal of Pragmatics 1231: 220–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2009. “The Grammar-Interaction Interface of Negative Questions in Estonian.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 221: 139–173.Google Scholar
Kim, Stephanie Hyeri. 2015. “Resisting the Terms of Polar Questions Through Ani (‘No’)-Prefacing in Korean Conversation.” Discourse Processes 52 (4): 311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2017. “On-line Emergence of Alternative Questions in Finnish with the Conjunction/Particle vai ‘or’.” In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, ed. by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 131–152. Helsinki, Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene. 2005a. “Alternative Questions Used in Conversational Repair.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Responses to Wh-question Challenges.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 81–103. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Katharina. 2017. “Question Tags als Diskursmarker? – Ansätze zu einer systematischen Beschreibung von ne im gesprochenen Deutsch.” In Diskursmarker im Deutschen. Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Arnulf Deppermann, Henrike Helmer, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 233–258. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hee. 2012. “Response Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers. 415–432. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Two Forms of Affirmative Responses to Polar Questions.” Discourse Processes 52 (1): 21–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Information and Affiliation: Disconfirming Responses to Polar Questions and What Follows in Third Position.” Journal of Pragmatics 1001: 59–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2012. “Action Formation and Ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna. 1997. Designing Social Actions: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish conversation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2007. “The TalkBank Project.” In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora: Synchronic Databases (Vol. 11), ed. by Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, and Hermann L. Moisl. Houndsmills, England: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie. 2012. “Grammar in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 475–491. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, Piia, and Esa Lehtinen. 2019. “Drawing Conclusions about What Co-participants Know: Knowledge-probing Question-Answer Sequences in New Employee Orientation Lectures.” Discourse and Communication 13 (5): 516–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2006. “Phonetics and Social Action in Agreements and Disagreements.” Journal of Pragmatics 101: 1752–1775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Innhwa. 2015. “Or-prefaced Third Turn Self-repairs in Student Questions.” Linguistics and Education 311: 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Persson, Rasmus. 2015. “Indexing One’s Own Previous Action as Inadequat: On ah-prefaced Repeats as Receipt Tokens in French Talk-in-Interaction.” Language in Society 44 (4): 497–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features Found in Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy.” Communication Monographs 55 (4): 360–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Fragen mit Antwortangebot, soziales Handeln und moralische Ordnung (Candidate Answer Queries, Actions, and the Moral Order).” In Sozialität in Slow Motion: Theoretische und Empirische Perspektiven Festschrift für Jörg Bergmann (Sociality in Slow Motion: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Festschrift for Jörg Bergmann), ed. by Ruth Ayass and Christian Meyer, 333–352. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Inferring the Purpose of a Prior Query and Responding Accordingly.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 61–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2012. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 681: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2015. “Questions and Responses in Spanish Monolingual and Spanish–English Bilingual Conversation.” Language and Communication 421: 50–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riccioni, Ilaria, Ramona Bongelli, Philip Gill, and Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2018. “Dubitative Questions and Epistemic Stance.” Lingua 2071: 71–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2020. “Revisiting Preference Organization in Context: A Qualitative and Quantitative Examination of Responses to Information Seeking.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 53 (2): 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press. Polar, Information-Seeking Questions and their Stance of Expectation for Affirmation: Implications for Preference Organization. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
Romaniuk, Tanya. 2013. “Pursuing Answers to Questions in Broadcast Journalism.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (2): 144–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossano, Federico. 2010. “Questioning and Responding in Italian.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2756–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1973/1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerry. 2012. “Formal Features of Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 103–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 531: 361–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gene H. Lerner. 2009. “Beginning to Respond: Well-prefaced Responses to Wh-questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 91–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 81: 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret. 1991. “W-Fragen in konversationellen Frage-Antwort-Sequenzen.” In Fragesätze und Fragen, ed. by Marga Reis, and Inger Rosengren, 263–288. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Arnulf Deppermann, Peter Gilles, Susanne Günthner, Martin Hartung, Friederike Kern, Christine Mertzlufft, Christian Meyer, Miriam Morek, Frank Oberzaucher, Jörg Peters, Uta Quasthoff, Wilfried Schütte, Anja Stukenbrock, and Susanne Uhmann. 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2) [Conversation analytic transcription system (GAT 2)].” Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion 101: 353–402.Google Scholar
Seuren, Lucas M. 2019. “Questioning in Court: The Construction of Direct Examinations.” Discourse Studies 21 (3): 340–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester, U.K.; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001a. Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. “Simple Answers to Polar Questions.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 405–431. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, and Trine Heinemann. 2013. “When ‘Yes’ is not Enough – as an Answer to a Yes/No Question.” In Units of Talk – Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed, and Geoffrey Raymond, 207–242. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2): 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “An Overview of the Question-Response System in American English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2772–2781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan Peter De Ruiter, Kyung Eun Yoon, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1061: 10587–10592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints.” Language in Society 39 (1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2006. “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Jack Sidnell, and Clara Bergen. 2018. “Children’s Responses to Questions in Peer Interaction: A Window into the Ontogenesis of Interactional Competence.” Journal of Pragmatics 1241: 14–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2012. “Reformulation of Questions with Candidate Answers.” The International Journal of Bilingualism 17 (2): 189–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. “Responses in Information-Seeking Sequences with ‘Question-Word Interrogatives.’” In Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions, 16–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2019. “Problematizing Information-seeking Wh-questions.” Language and Communication 641: 81–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, Candace. 1983. “‘Ask Me no Questions…’ An Analysis of Queries and Replies in Physician-Patient Dialogues.” In The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication, ed. by In Sue Fisher, and Alexandra D. Todd, 75–106. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Korpela, Rosa, Salla Kurhila & Melisa Stevanovic
2022. Apologizing in Elementary School Peer Conflict Mediation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 55:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.