Didn’t she say to you, “Oh my God! In Pafos?”
Hypothetical quotations in everyday conversation
This study examines the linguistic and discursive format as well as the functions of hypothetical quotations in
everyday, informal conversations amongst Greek Cypriot friends. Drawing from a dataset of 270 minutes of naturally-occurring
conversations, this study documents the linguistic format of sixty-one hypothetical quotations and examines why speakers resort to
formulating such quotations to begin with. To do so,
Goffman’s (1981) work on footing
and participation framework is employed along with an analysis of these quotations in interaction following the work of
Goodwin (2007). This study shows that most instances of hypothetical quotations are
formulated as direct quotations. There can be both self- and other-quotations, and the quotative can take various forms.
Hypothetical quotations serve an array of discursive functions, such as showing the listener’s involvement in an interaction,
creating humour, supporting one’s argument or refuting the argument of the other, in line with other studies in the
literature.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Materials and methods
- 3.Hypothetical quotations in informal Greek Cypriot interactions
- 3.1The linguistic format of hypothetical quotations
- 3.2The discursive forms and functions of hypothetical quotations
- 3.2.1Acting as an argumentative device
- 3.2.2Making an assessment and showing involvement
- 3.2.3Enacting stereotypical characters
- 4.Discussion and concluding remarks
- Transcript conventions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (57)
References
Acuña, Virginia. 2020. “Staging
Mental Discursive Processes and Reactions: The Construction of Direct Reported Thought (DRT) in Conversational
Storytelling”. Language in
Society 50 (2): 235–57.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Acuña, Virginia. 2021. “The
Construction of Future and Hypothetical Dialogues in Third-party Complaints as Enactments of a Subsequent Direct
Complaint”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1811: 68–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Antaki, Charles. 2003. “The
Uses of Absurdity”. In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary
Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 85–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar. 1990. “Claim-backing
and Other Explanatory Genres in Talk”. Journal of Language and Social
Psychology 91: 279–292. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Archakis, Argiris, and Dimitris Papazachariou. 2008. “Prosodic
Cues of Identity Construction: Intensity in Greek Young Women’s Conversational
Narratives”. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 12 (5): 627–647. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four
Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing
Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-communicative Act”. In The Pragmatics of
Quoting Now and Then, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. “Localized
Globalization: A Multi-local, Multivariate Investigation of Quotative Be Like”. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 13 (3): 291–331. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. “Quotations
as
Demonstrations”. Language 66 (4): 764–805. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clift, Rebecca. 2007. “Getting
There First: Non-narrative Reported Speech in
Interaction”. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in
Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 120–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita. 2020. “‘And
I Quote’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1571: 89–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita, and Daniel Weiss. 2020. “Doing
Things with Quotes: Introduction”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1571: 84–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina. 2015. “An
Empirical Study of English in Cypriot Greek Conversations and Print Media”. PhD
diss. University of Essex![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina. 2017a. “English–Greek
Code-switching in Greek Cypriot Magazines and Newspapers – An Analysis of Its Textual Forms and
Functions”. Journal of World
Languages 4 (1): 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina. 2017b. “English
Discourse Markers in Cypriot Greek”. In Researchers in Progress II.
Languages in Contact: Languages with History. Proceedings of the 2nd UCY-LC International Forum of Young
Researchers, ed. by Pedro J. Molina Muñoz, 103–116. Nicosia: Language Centre – University of Cyprus.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina. 2018. “A
Linguistic Analysis of Cypriot Greek–English Compound
Verbs.” Lingua 2151: 1–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina. 2019. “Debunking
a Myth: The Greek Language in Cyprus Is Not Being Destroyed. A Linguistic Analysis of Cypriot Greek–English
Codeswitching”. International Journal of
Bilingualism 23 (6): 1358–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina. 2020. ““Θέλεις huge sample για να φκάλεις valid statistical results [You want a huge sample to generate valid statistical results]”: A Conversational Analysis of
Cypriot Greek – English Codeswitching”. In Proceedings of the 13th
International Conference on Greek Linguistics, ed. by Maria Chondrogianni, Simon Courtenage, Geoffrey Horrocks, Amalia Arvaniti, and Ianthi Tsimpli. London: Westminster Computation and Linguistics Group, pp. 93–105.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina. 2022. “English
in Cyprus: The Now and Then of English in a Former British Colony”. English
Today: 1–7. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina, and Ioli Ayiomamitou. 2021. ““We
Are in Cyprus, We Have to Use Our Language, Don’t We?” Pupils’ and Their Parents’ Attitudes towards Two Proximal Linguistic
Varieties”. Linguistics and
Education 631: 100931. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fotiou, Constantina, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann. 2022. “A
Small Island with Big Differences? Folk Perceptions in the Context of Dialect Levelling and
Koineization”. Frontiers in Communication 61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame
Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of
Experience. Lebanon: University Press of New England.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms
of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990a. He-said-she-said: Talk as Social
Organization among Black Children. Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990b. “Retellings, Pretellings and
Hypothetical Stories”. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 24 (1–4): 263–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golato, Andrea. 2012. “Impersonal
Quotation and Hypothetical Discourse”. In Quotatives:
Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 3–36. Amsterdam, Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Interactive
Footing”. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in
Interaction ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haakana, Markku. 2007. “Reported
Thought in Complaint Stories”. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in
Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 150–78. Studies
in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haberland, Hartmut. 1986. “Reported
Speech in Danish”. In Direct and Indirect
Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 219–253. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 1984. “A
Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential
Placement”. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holt, Elizabeth. 2000. “Reporting
and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech”. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 33 (4): 425–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holt, Elizabeth. 2007. “‘I’m
Eyeing Your Chop Up Mind’: Reporting and Enacting”. In Reporting
Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irvine, Judith Temkin. 1996. “Shadow Conversations: The
Indeterminacy of Participant Roles”. In Natural Histories of
Discourse, ed. by Michael Silverstein, and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koester, Almut, and Michael Handford. 2018. “It’s
Not Good Saying: ‘Well It Might Do That or It Might Not’: Hypothetical Reported Speech in Business
Meetings”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1301: 67–80. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 1972. Language
in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English
Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehner, Adrienne. 1989. “Remembering
and Representing Prose: Quoted Speech as a Data Source”. Discourse
Processes 121: 105–125. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mohammad, Abeer, and Camilla Vásquez. 2015. “‘Rachel’s
Not Here’: Constructed Dialogue in Gossip”. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 19 (3): 351–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, Greg. 1999. “Functions
of Reported Speech in Group Discussions”. Applied
Linguistics 20 (3): 376–401. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Park, Innhwa. 2018. “Reported
Thought as (Hypothetical) Assessment”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1291: 1–12. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pascual, Esther, and Todd Oakley. 2017. “Fictive
Interaction”. In Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, 347–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme
Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims”. Human
Studies 91: 219–229. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pujolar, Joan. 2001. Gender,
Heteroglossia and Power: A Sociolinguistic Study of Youth Culture. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandlund, Erica. 2014. “Prescribing
Conduct: Enactments of Talk or Thought in Advice-Giving Sequences”. Discourse
Studies 16 (5): 645–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sams, Jessie. 2010. “Quoting
the Unspoken: An Analysis of Quotations in Spoken Discourse”. Journal of
Pragmatics 421: 3147–3160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse
Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simmons, Katie, and Amanda LeCouteur. 2011. “‘Hypothetical
Active-voicing’: Therapists ‘Modelling’ of Clients’ Future Conversations in CBT
Interactions”. Journal of
Pragmatics 431: 3177–3192. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. “Introducing
Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary
Narratives”. In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed.
by Florian Coulmas, 311–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking
Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational
Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trester, Anna Marie. 2009. “Discourse Marker ‘Oh’ as a
Means for Realizing the Identity Potential of Constructed Dialogue in Interaction”. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 13 (2): 147–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiss, Daniel. 2020. “Analogical
Reasoning with Quotations? A Spotlight on Russian Parliamentary Discourse”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1551: 101–110. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winchatz, Michaela R., and Alexander Kozin. 2008. “Comical
Hypothetical: Arguing for a Conversational Phenomenon”. Discourse
Studies 10 (3): 383–405. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.