Re-evaluating the importance of discourse-embedding for specificational and predicative clauses
This paper studies the discourse-embedding of specificational clauses, in contrast with predicative ones. Specificational
clauses – which express a variable – value relation – are assumed to have a ‘fixed’ information structure. This follows from the widespread
definition of information structure in terms of a presupposition – focus contrast, which is often conflated with the variable – value
contrast, on the one hand, and with a given – new contrast, on the other. Against these conflations, this study demonstrates that the
specification is a separate layer of meaning, which not only shows variation in terms of focus-marking (
Van Praet and O’Grady 2018), but also in terms of its embedding in specific contexts of use. These findings urge us to revisit not
only the basis for distinguishing specificational clauses from predicative ones, but also to separate out the different layers of coded and
pragmatic meaning that have been conflated under the header of ‘information structure’.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A taxonomy of discourse-familiarity
- 3.Method
- 4.Quantitative and qualitative analysis
- 4.1The embedding of predicative and non-reversed specificational clauses
- 4.2The embedding of indefinite vs definite variable subjects
- 4.3The embedding of non-reversed vs reversed specificationals with indefinite variable NP
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (36)
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2013. “A Quechuan Mirative?” In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Anne Storch, 95–109. Leiden: Brill.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. “The Essence of Mirativity.” Linguistic Typology 16(3), 435–485.
Akmajian, Adrian. 1970. Aspects of the Grammar of Focus in English. MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
Beltrama, Andrea, and Emily A. Hanink. 2019. “Marking Imprecision, Conveying Surprise: Like Between Hedging and Mirativity.” Journal of Linguistics 55(1), 1–34.
Birner, Betty J. 1994. “Information Status and Word Order: An Analysis of English Inversion.” Language 70(2), 233–259.
Birner, Betty J. 1996. The Discourse Function of Inversion in English. New York, NY: Garland.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1952. “Linear Modification.” PMLA 67(7), 1117–1144.
Chomsky, Noam. 1969. Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Davidse, Kristin, and Wout Van Praet. 2019. “Rethinking Predicative Clauses with Indefinite Predicate and Specificational Clauses with Indefinite Variable: A Cognitive-Functional Account.” Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 381: 1–36.
Declerck, Renaat. 1988. Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts, and Pseudo-Clefts. Dordrecht: Foris.
Delancey, Scott. 1997. “Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information.” Linguistic Typology 1(1), 33–52.
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: CUP.
Gentens, Caroline. 2016. The Factive–Reported Distinction in English: Representational and Interpersonal Semantics. KU Leuven Ph.D. dissertation.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2.” Journal of Linguistics 3(2), 199–244.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: OUP.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 1st ed. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.
Heycock, Caroline. 2012. “Specification, Equation, and Agreement in Copular Sentences.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 57(2), 209–240.
Higgins, Francis R. 1979. The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. London: Routledge.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lehmann, Christian. 2008. “Information Structure and Grammaticalization.” In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, ed. by Elena Seoane and María José López-Couso, 207–229. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: CUP.
Patten, Amanda L. 2012. The English It-Cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. “Towards a Taxonomy of Given–New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 281–297. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4), 447–457.
Vallduvi, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York/London: Garland.
Van Praet, Wout. 2019. “Focus Assignment in English Specificational and Predicative Clauses: Intonation as a Cue to Information Structure?” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51(2): 222–241.
Van Praet, Wout. 2020. English Specificational and Predicative Clauses: A Functional-Cognitive Account of their Representational and Textual Organisation. KU Leuven and UNamur Ph.D. dissertation.
Van Praet, Wout, and Gerard O’Grady. 2018. “The Prosody of Specification: Discourse Intonational Cues to Setting up a Variable.” Journal of Pragmatics 1351: 87–100.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2006. “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Malden, MA: Blackwell.