Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 31:4 (2021) ► pp.560588
References (36)
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2013. “A Quechuan Mirative?” In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Anne Storch, 95–109. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. “The Essence of Mirativity.” Linguistic Typology 16(3), 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian. 1970. Aspects of the Grammar of Focus in English. MIT Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea, and Emily A. Hanink. 2019. “Marking Imprecision, Conveying Surprise: Like Between Hedging and Mirativity.” Journal of Linguistics 55(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 1994. “Information Status and Word Order: An Analysis of English Inversion.” Language 70(2), 233–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. The Discourse Function of Inversion in English. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1952. “Linear Modification.” PMLA 67(7), 1117–1144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1969. Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, and Wout Van Praet. 2019. “Rethinking Predicative Clauses with Indefinite Predicate and Specificational Clauses with Indefinite Variable: A Cognitive-Functional Account.” Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 381: 1–36.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1988. Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts, and Pseudo-Clefts. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delancey, Scott. 1997. “Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information.” Linguistic Typology 1(1), 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline. 2016. The Factive–Reported Distinction in English: Representational and Interpersonal Semantics. KU Leuven Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2.” Journal of Linguistics 3(2), 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 1st ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2012. “Specification, Equation, and Agreement in Copular Sentences.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 57(2), 209–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Francis R. 1979. The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2005. “ It-Extraposition in English: A Functional View.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(2), 119–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2008. “Information Structure and Grammaticalization.” In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, ed. by Elena Seoane and María José López-Couso, 207–229. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, Line. 2005. Copular Clauses: Specification, Predication and Equation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, Amanda L. 2012. The English It-Cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. “Towards a Taxonomy of Given–New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 281–297. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992. “The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness and Information Status.” In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, ed. by William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson, 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4), 447–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vallduvi, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York/London: Garland.Google Scholar
Van Praet, Wout. 2019. “Focus Assignment in English Specificational and Predicative Clauses: Intonation as a Cue to Information Structure?Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51(2): 222–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. English Specificational and Predicative Clauses: A Functional-Cognitive Account of their Representational and Textual Organisation. KU Leuven and UNamur Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Van Praet, Wout, and Gerard O’Grady. 2018. “The Prosody of Specification: Discourse Intonational Cues to Setting up a Variable.” Journal of Pragmatics 1351: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2006. “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar