Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 32:4 (2022) ► pp.562–587

Picking fights with politicians

Categories, partitioning and the achievement of antagonism

ORCID logo | Ulster University
ORCID logo | Leeds Trinity University
In 2016 the UK held a divisive referendum on its membership of the European Union. In the aftermath, difference and division were rife in politics and in everyday life. This article explores how such difference and division play out in and through interaction through examining a citizen ‘picking a fight’ with a politician over how Brexit has been handled. Drawing on membership categorisation analysis we show how antagonism is interactionally accomplished. The analysis focuses on three categorial strategies which interlocutors use to achieve antagonism: establishing omnirelevant devices, categories and their predicates; explicitly challenging category membership; and partitioning a population. Beyond offering insights into moments of social life that are not easily captured, the findings contribute to an empirical conceptualisation of antagonism and illustrate how membership categorisation analysis can shed light on its interactional achievement.
Keywords: antagonism, membership categorisation analysis, conflict, Brexit, social interaction, political discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Contesting Brexit in language
    • 2.2Membership categorisation analysis
    • 2.3Categories in political encounters
    • 2.4Antagonism
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Establishing omnirelevant devices, categories and their predicates
    • 4.2Challenging category membership
    • 4.3Creating ingroup and outgroup through partitioning
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 14 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21028.joy
References (50)
References
Abrams, Dominic, and Giovanni A. Travaglino. 2018. “Immigration, Political Trust, and Brexit-Testing an Aversion Amplification Hypothesis.” British Journal of Social Psychology 57 (2): 310–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Jonathan W. P., and Keon West. 2020. “Brexit: The Influence of Motivation to Respond without Prejudice, Willingness to Disagree, and Attitudes to Immigration.” British Journal of Social Psychology 60 (1): 222–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Will Strawson. 2019. “Can’t Answer? Won’t Answer? An Analysis of Equivocal Responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Parliamentary Affairs 73 (2): 429–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Carly W., Richard Fitzgerald, and Rod Gardner. 2009. “Branching Out: Ethnomethodological Approaches to Communication.” Australian Journal of Communication 36 (3): 1–14.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Matthew Goodwin, and Paul Whiteley. 2017. Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, John, and Janet Newman. 2019. “What’s the Subject? Brexit and Politics as Articulation.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 29 (1): 67–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca, and Marco Pino. 2020. “Turning the Tables: Objecting to Conduct in Conflict Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 53 (4): 463–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifton, Jonathan. 2009. “A Membership Categorization Analysis of the Waco Siege: Perpetrator-Victim Identity as a Moral Discrepancy Device for ‘Doing’ Subversion.” Sociological Research Online 14 (5): 38–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2003. “Sociolinguistic Authenticities.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (3): 417–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cromdal, Jakob. 2004. “Building Bilingual Oppositions: Code-Switching in Children’s Disputes.” Language in Society 33 (1): 33–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demasi, Mirko A. 2019. “Facts as Social Action in Political Debates about the European Union.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dersley, Ian, and Anthony Wootton. 2000. “Complaint Sequences within Antagonistic Argument.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 375–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eglin, Peter, and and Stephen Hester. 1992. “Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action.” Semiotica 88 (3–4): 243–268.Google Scholar
Eglin, Peter, and Stephen Hester. 1999. ““You’re All a Bunch of Feminists”: Categorization and the Politics of Terror in the Montreal Massacre.” Human Studies 22 (2–4): 253–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorization Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley, and Carly W. Butler. 2009. “Omnirelevance and Interactional Context.” Australian Journal of Communication 36 (3): 45–64.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, and Joanna Thornborrow. 2017. “‘I’m a Scouser’: Membership Categories and Political Geography in the 2016 UK Election Call Phone-in”. Journal of Language and Politics 16 (1): 40–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, David, and Sally Hester. 2017. “Stephen Hester on the Problem of Culturalism.” Journal of Pragmatics 1181: 56–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-face Behaviour. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Hänska-Ahy, Max, and Stefan Bauchowitz. 2017. Tweeting for Brexit: How Social Media Influenced the Referendum. In Brexit, Trump and the Media, ed. by J. Mair, T. Clark, N. Fowler, R. Snoddy, and R. Tait. 31–35. Suffolk: Abramis Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire. 2010. “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (2): 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin. 1997a. Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.Google Scholar
. 1997b. “Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester, and Peter Eglin. 1–23. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hofstetter, Emily, and Elizabeth H. Stokoe. 2015. “Offers of Assistance in Politician-Constituent Interaction.” Discourse Studies 17 (6): 724–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Getting Service at the Constituency Office: Analyzing Citizens’ Encounters with their Member of Parliament.” Text & Talk 38 (5): 551–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2002. “The Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorization Analysis.” Qualitative Research 2 (1): 59–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housley, William. 2002. “Moral Discrepancy and ‘Fudging the Issue’ in a Radio News Interview.” Sociology 36 (1): 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2003. “Moral Discrepancy and Political Discourse: Accountability and the Allocation of Blame in a Political News Interview.” Sociological Research Online 8 (2): 18–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housley, William, Helena Webb, Adam Edwards, Rob Procter, and Marina Jirotka. 2017. “Digitizing Sacks? Approaching Social Media as Data.” Qualitative Research 17 (6): 627–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena. 1984. Categorization and the Moral Order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Joyce, Jack B., Bogdana Humă, Hanna-Leena Ristimäki, Fabio Ferraz de Almeida, and Ann Doehring. 2021. “Speaking out Against Everyday Sexism: Gender and Epistemics in Accusations of “Mansplaining”.” Feminism & Psychology 30 (4): 502–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Jack B., and Linda Walz. 2021. Picking Fights with Politicians Dataset. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jirí Nekvapil. 2004. “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’, and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 15 (2–3): 243–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meredith, Joanne, and Emma Richardson. 2019. “The Use of the Political Categories of Brexiter and Remainer in Online Comments about the EU referendum.” Community and Applied Social Psychology 29 (1): 43–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishizaka, Aug. 2021. “Partitioning a Population in Agreement and Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 1721: 225–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim, and Leslie Jeffries. 2019. “Introduction: The Origins of The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by M. Evans, L. Jeffries, and J. O’Driscoll. 1–9. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35 (5): 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Edward. 2011. “Enticing a Challengeable in Arguments: Sequence, Epistemics and Preference Organisation.” Pragmatics 21 (3): 411–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “How Participants in Arguments Challenge the Normative Position of an Opponent.” Discourse Studies 17 (3): 299–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robles, Jessica S. 2011. “Doing Disagreement in the House of Lords: ‘Talking around the Issue’ as a Context-Appropriate Argumentative Strategy.” Discourse & Communication 5 (2): 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robles, Jessica S., and Theresa Castor. 2019. “Taking the Moral High Ground: Practices for Being Uncompromisingly Principled.” Journal of Pragmatics 1411: 115–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing “Being Ordinary”.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage. 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth H. 2003. “Mothers, Single Women and Sluts: Gender, Morality and Membership Categorization in Neighbour Disputes.” Feminism and Psychology 13 (3): 317–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tainio, Liisa. 2003. “‘When Shall We Go for a Ride?’ A Case of the Sexual Harassment of a Young Girl.” Discourse & Society 14 (2): 173–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Schepen, Nynke. 2019. “Political Transparency Matters: Citizens Challenging Officials via ‘Have You Planned X’-Type Questions.” Discourse & Society 30 (5): 521–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walz, Linda, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2020. “A Stranger in a Foreign Land: Identity Transition in Blogs about Transnational Relocation.” Discourse, Context & Media 361: 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdicombe, Sue, and Robin Wooffitt. 1990. “‘Being’ versus ‘Doing’ Punk: On Achieving Authenticity as a Member.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9 (4): 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Kim, Younhee & Richard Fitzgerald
2024. Occasioned Semantics and Membership Categorisation Analysis: Fields of meaning, categorial consistency and omni-relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 226 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Walz, Linda, Jack B. Joyce & Natalie Flint
2024. “Facebook’s about to know, Karen”. Internet Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2023. ‘We are not putschists’: Accountability and the negotiation of membership categories in political news interviews. Discourse, Context & Media 56 ► pp. 100743 ff. DOI logo
Joyce, Jack B
2022. Resistance in public disputes: Third-turn blocking to suspend progressivity. Discourse Studies 24:2 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Joyce, Jack B. & J. Sterphone
2022. Challenging racism in public spaces: Practices for interventions into disputes. Journal of Pragmatics 201 ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.