Article published In:
The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 275296
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., and M. Schlesewsky
(2009) Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, C
(2008) Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences 30.1: 1-30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W
(1994) Discourse, Conciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, J.H
(2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística 51/21: 11-33.Google Scholar
Cornish, F
(2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In E. Keizer, and G. Wanders (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 821: 97-115.Google Scholar
(2013) On the dual nature of the Functional Discourse Grammar model: Context, the language system/language use distinction, and indexical reference in discourse. Language Sciences 381: 83-98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, D
(2007) Lexical competence and Functional Discourse Grammar. ALFA: Revista de Lingüística 51.2: 165-187.Google Scholar
this issue) Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics 24.2: 297-316. DOI logo
Gurevich, O., M. Johnson, and A.E. Goldberg
(2010) Incidental verbatim memory for language. Language and Cognition 2.1: 45-78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K., and J.L. Mackenzie
(2008) Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
this issue) Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics 24.2: 203-227. DOI logo
Keizer, M.E
(2007a) Possessive constructions in English: The proposal’s supporters or the supporters of the proposal? In M. Hannay, and G. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 59-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b) The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J.L
(2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 341: 421-432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
this issue) The Contextual Component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 249-273. DOI logo
Pickering, M.J., and S. Garrod
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 271: 169-226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Establishing and using routines during dialogue: Implications for psychology and linguistics. In A. Cutler (ed.), Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 85-102.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, F
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Connolly, John H.
2015. The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2020. Headedness and modification in Functional Discourse Grammar. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2021. The Place of Interpersonal Lexemes in Linguistic Theory, with Special Reference to Functional Discourse Grammar. Corpus Pragmatics 5:2  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Lopes Câmara, Aliana & Roberto Gomes Camacho
2019. La expresión del pronombre reasuntivo en la cláusula relativa en la lengua española. Hispanic Research Journal 20:3  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2015. The contextual component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2016. Dynamicity and dialogue. English Text Construction 9:1  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Seraku, Tohru
2020. Placeholders in Yoron Ryukyuan: A view from Functional Discourse Grammar. Lingua 245  pp. 102852 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.