Our paper concerns the grammar of clause combining in Finnish and Japanese conversation. We consider the patterns of clause combining in our data and focus on the verbal and non-verbal cues which allow participants to determine whether, after the end of a clause-sized unit, the turn will end or continue with another clause-sized unit, resulting in a clause combination. We conclude that morphosyntax alone cannot account for the patterns found in our data, but that the participants orient to, at least, prosodic and nonverbal cues in determining the boundaries of clauses and projecting continuation in the form of another clause. Also important for projection are fixed expressions or ‘prefabs’. In addition, semantic and pragmatic factors play a role. In that sense, we explore the question of where the limits of grammar for interaction, understood as the knowledge which speakers share and which forms the basis for the creation and processing of novel utterances, should be drawn, and whether grammar should include, beyond morphosyntax, not only prosodic, pragmatic and semantic features but also bodily behavior.
Aho, E. (2010) Spontaanin puheen prosodinen jaksottelu. [Prosodic segmentation in spontaneous speech]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Auer, P. (1992) The neverending sentence: On rightward expansion in spoken syntax. In M. Kontra, and T. Váradi (eds.), Studies in spoken Languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp. 41-60.
Auer, P. (2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25.1: 7-36. BoP
Auer, P. (2009) Projection and minimalistic syntax in interaction. Discourse Processes 46.2: 180-205.
Auer, P., and S. Pfänder (2011) Constructions: Emerging or emergent? In P. Auer, and S. Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-21.
Bybee, J. (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, W.L. (1980) The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In W.L. Chafe (ed.), The Pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 9-50. BoP
Chafe, W.L. (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 21-51.
Chafe, W.L. (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP
Clancy, P.M. (1980a) The Acquisition of Narrative Discourse: A Study in Japanese. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Clancy, P.M. (1980b) Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W.L. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 127-202.
Cook, H.M. (1992) Meanings of non-referential indexes: A case study of the Japanese sentence-final ne. Text 12.4: 507-539.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009) On combining clauses and actions in conversation. In Virittäjä 31. [URL]
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012) Turn continuation and clause combinations. Discourse Processes 491: 273-299.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., and S.A. Thompson (2008) On assessing situations and events in conversation: Extraposition and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10.4: 443-467. BoP
Du Bois, J.W. (1987) The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 631: 805-855.
Du Bois, J.W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, D. Paolino, and S. Cumming (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J.A. Edwards, and M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-89.
Duvallon, O., and S. Routarinne (2005) Parenthesis as a resource in the grammar of conversation. In A. Hakulinen, and M. Selting (eds.), Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 45-74.
Evans, N. (2007) Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 366-431.
Ford, C. (2004) Contingency and units in interaction. Discourse Studies 61: 27-52. BoP
Fromkin, V., and R. Rodman (1993) An Introduction to Language. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.
Goffman, Erving (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Goodwin, Charles (2003) The body in action. In J. Coupland, and R. Gwyn (eds.), Discourse, the Body and Identity. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 19-42.
Haddington, P., L. Mondada, and M. Nevile (2013) Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter.
Hakulinen, A., M. Vilkuna, R. Korhonen, V. Koivisto, T.R. Heinonen, and I. Alho (2004) Iso suomen kielioppi. [The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
Hauser, M.D., N. Chomsky, and W.T. Fitch (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 2981: 1569-1579.
Hinds, J. (1982) Ellipsis in Japanese. Carbondale: Linguistic Research. BoP
Hopper, P. (1987) Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131: 139-157.
Hopper, P., and S.A. Thompson (2008) Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In R. Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 99-124.
Iwasaki, S. (1993a) The structure of the intonation unit in Japanese. In S. Choi (ed.), Japanese and Korean linguistics, vol. 3. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 39-53.
Iwasaki, S. (2002) Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Iwasaki, S. (2013) Japanese. Revised edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Iwasaki, S., and T. Ono (2002) “Sentence” in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse. In J. Bybee, and M. Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of S.A. Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 175-202.
Jefferson, G. (1972) Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press, pp. 294-338.
Keenan, E., and B. Comrie (1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 63-99.
Keevallik, L. (2003) From Interaction to Grammar: Estonian Finite Verb Forms in Conversation. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Kirkkomäki, E. (2012) Johtoilmaukset ja referointi kertomuksissa. [Framing expressions and quotation in Stories]. MA thesis, University of Helsinki.
Koivisto, A. (2011) Sanomattakin selvää? Ja, mutta ja että puheenvuoron lopussa. [Goes without saying? Ja, mutta and että at the end of a turn at talk]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Koivisto, A. (in prep.) Online emergence of alternative questions in Finnish with the conjunction/particle vai ‘or’. Submitted to R. Laury, M. Etelämäki and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Combining Clauses and Actions in Interaction.
Koivisto, A., R. Laury, and E-L. Seppänen (2011) Syntactic and actional characteristics of Finnish että-clauses. In R. Laury, and R. Suzuki (eds.), Subordination in conversation: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 69-102 BoP
Kuno, S. (1973) The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kuroda, S-Y. (1965) Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Kärkkäinen, E. (forthcoming) I Thought It Was Very Interesting: Conversational Formats for Taking a Stance. Oulu: Department of English, University of Oulu
Laury, R., and T. Ono (2010) Recursion in conversation: What speakers of Finnish and Japanese know how to do. In H. van der Hulst (ed.), Recursion and Human Language. Studies in Generative Grammar 140. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: pp. 69-92.
Laury, R., R. Suzuki, and T. Ono (2013) Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. Paper given in the Workshop on Linguistic and Interactional Units in Everyday Speech, International Conference on Cognitive Linguistics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, June 21–22.
Laver, J. (1994) Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Local, J., and J. Kelly (1986) Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 91: 185-204.
Mazeland, H. (2007) Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1816-1869. BoP
Newmeyer, F.J. (2003) Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 791: 682-707.
Ogden, R.(2004) Non-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnish. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, and C.E. Ford (eds.), Sound patterns in interaction. Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 29-62.
Ohori, T. (1992) Diachrony in Clause Linkage and Related Issues. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Okamoto, S. (1990) Potential Complements and Complementation: The Case of Japanese. Unpublished ms., California State University.
Ono, T. (2011) The actual status of so-called particle ellipsis in Japanese: Evidence from conversation, acquisition, diachrony, and contact. In S. Rice, and J. Newman (eds.), Experimental and empirical methods. Chicago: CSLI, pp. 180-189.
Ono, T., and R. Suzuki (2011) Toward a new understanding of the so-called zero anaphora in Japanese everyday talk. Paper given in the panel ‘Beyond Pro-Drop: The Pragmatics of Subject Ellipsis and Expression from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective’ IPrA 12, Manchester, GB.
Ono, T., and S.A. Thompson (1997) Deconstructing ‘zero anaphora’ in Japanese. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 481-491.
Payne, T. (1997) Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sadler, M. (2001) Iconically motivated use of the Japanese discourse makers sorede, nde, and de in conversation. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 22.2: 143-161.
Shibatani, M. (1990) The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart Jr., T.W., and N. Vaillette (2001) Language Files: Materials for an Introduction to Language and Linguistics, Eighth Edition. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
Suzuki, R. (1991) A study of wake in Japanese narrative discourse. In M. Takeuchiet al.. (eds.), Kotoba no mozaiku: Okuda Natsuko meiyo kyooju koki kinen ronbunshuu. [Mosaic of words: Papers in honor of Professor Emeritus Natsuko Okuda]. Tokyo: Mejiro Linguistic Society, pp. 124-137.
Tanaka, H. (2000) The particle ne as a turn-management device in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32.8: 1135-1176. BoP
Thompson, S.A., and E. Couper-Kuhlen (2005) The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7.4/5: 481-505. [Reprinted in Language and Linguistics 6.4: 807-837, 2005] BoP
Tsujimura, N. (1996) An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Vatanen, A. (forthc.) Responding in Overlap. Turn onset timing and social action in Finnish and Estonian Conversation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugric and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki.
2016. Beyond dichotomies and continua?: an interactional approach to the grammar of clause combining in Japanese. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 35 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.