Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of languageEdited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 389–426
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 389–426
Intonation and clause combining in discourse
The case of because
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References (40)
Altenberg, Bengt (1984) Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38.1: 20-69. 
(1987) Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In J. Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Pinter, pp. 50-64.
Chafe, Wallace (1984) How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 101: 437-449.
(1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman and S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-27.
Cohen, Antonie and Johan ‘t Hart (1965) Perceptual analysis of intonation patterns. Proceedings of the Vth International Congress on Acoustics, Liège 1964 : Paper A 16.
Cohen, Antonie, René Collier & Johan’t Hart (1982) Declination: Construct or intrinsic feature of speech pitch? Phonetica 391: 254-273.
Cooper, William E. & John M. Sorensen (1981) Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Berlin: Springer.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting (1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodie perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation-Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-56.
Cruttenden, Alan (1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Du Bois, John W. (1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-365.
Ducrot, Oswald, Marie-Claire Barbault et al.. (1975) Car, parce que, puisque. Revue romane 101: 248-280.
Erdmann, Peter (1990) Discourse and grammar. Focussing and defocussing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1988) The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization: 35-55.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay et al.. (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
. Language 64.3: 501-538. BoP
BoPFillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay (1995) Construction grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications. BoP
Ford, Cecilia E. (1993) Grammar in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoP. (1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text 14.4: 531-554. BoP
Ford, Cecilia E. & Junko Mori (1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1: 31-61. BoP
Fox, Barbara (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPGivón, Talmy (1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Haiman, John & Sandra A Thompson (1984) ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 101: 510-523.
(1988) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoPHalliday, M. A K & Ruqaiya Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman, pp. 226-273. BoP
Hart, J.t., R. Collier et al.. (1990) A perceptual study of intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinämäki, Orvokki (1975) Because and since. Linguistica Silesiana 11: 135-143.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Ladd, D. Robert (1984) Declination: A review and some hypotheses. In C. Ewen & J. Anderson (eds.), Phonology Yearbook. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, pp. 53-74.
(1988) Declination “reset” and the hierachical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84.2: 530-544.
Lehmann, Christian (1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 181-225.
Mann, William C. (1984) Discourse structures for text generation. Information Sciences Institute Research Report 1271: 1-17.
. (1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoPMatthiessen, Christian & Sandra A Thompson (1988) The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 275-329. BoP
BoPOno, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A Thompson (1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the alternative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPSchuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber (1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech 341: 207-234.
Schleppegrell, Mary J. (1991) Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 323-337.
Sweetser, Eve (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPThorsen, Nina (1978) An acoustical investigation of Danish intonation. Journal of Phonetics 61: 151-175.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König (1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 189-218.
Willems, Nico (1982) English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris.
Cited by (57)
Cited by 57 other publications
Field, Margaret
2022. Increments in Navajo conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 637 ff. 
Kitano, Hiroaki
2022. On interaction and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 383 ff.
PEKAREK DOEHLER, SIMONA & SØREN W. ESKILDSEN
2022. Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Shaheen, Jonathan
2022. How general can theories of ‘why’ and ‘because’ be?. Inquiry 65:8 ► pp. 1042 ff.
Catasso, Nicholas
2021. Some notes on central causal clauses in Venetian. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 519 ff.
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Spagnolli, Anna, Sonia Genovese & Mattia Mori
2021. Similarities and Differences Across Settings: The Case of Turn Continuations in Instant Messaging. In Analysing Digital Interaction, ► pp. 133 ff.
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2020. Chapter 11. Relative-clause increments and the management of reference. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 303 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Fonctionnement macro-syntaxique et dimension anaphorique des relatives produites post hoc : une analyse interactionnelle et multimodale. Langue française N° 210:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
2019. “May I tell you something?”: When questions do not anticipate responses. Text & Talk 39:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
Gipper, Sonja & Foong Ha Yap
2019. Chapter 9. Life of =ti: Use and grammaticalization of a clausal nominalizer in Yurakaré. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 363 ff.
Sanders, Ted J.M. & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2019. Chapter 10. Subjectivity and Causality in discourse and cognition. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305], ► pp. 273 ff.
Levis, John M.
2018. Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
Basterrechea, María & Regina Weinert
2017. Examining the Concept of Subordination in Spoken L1 and L2 English: The Case ofIf‐Clauses. TESOL Quarterly 51:4 ► pp. 897 ff.
Li, Fang, Willem M. Mak, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders
2017. On the online effects of subjectivity encoded in causal connectives. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
Čermáková, Anna, Zuzana Komrsková, Marie Kopřivová & Petra Poukarová
2017. Between Syntax and Pragmatics: The Causal Conjunction Protože in Spoken and Written Czech. Corpus Pragmatics 1:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
Cristofaro, Sonia
2016. Chapter 15. Routes to insubordination. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 393 ff.
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2016. Toward a global approach to discourse uses of conjunctions in spoken French. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 79 ff.
Detges, Ulrich & Thomas Weidhaas
2016. Coherence and interaction. The French causal connectors comme and car. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 111 ff.
Ehmer, Oliver & Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
2016. Adverbial patterns in interaction. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016. On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 341 ff.
Gonen, Einat, Zohar Livnat & Noam Amir
2015. The discourse marker axshav (‘now’) in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Discursive and prosodic features. Journal of Pragmatics 89 ► pp. 69 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2015. Managing the Boundary Between “Yes” and “But”: Two Ways of Disaffiliating With Germanja aberandjaber. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Burridge, Kate
2014. Cos—A New Discourse Marker for Australian English?. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 524 ff.
Markaki, Vassiliki
2014. Désalignement et gestion des territoires épistémiques : l’utilisation de yes but dans des réunions professionnelles internationales. In Corps en interaction, ► pp. 227 ff.
van Veen, Rosie, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted Sanders & Huub van den Bergh
2014. “Why? Because I’m talking to you!” Parental input and cognitive complexity as determinants of children’s connective acquisition. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 209 ff.
Canestrelli, Anneloes R., Willem M. Mak & Ted J. M. Sanders
2013. Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:9 ► pp. 1394 ff.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2011. Action, prosody and emergent constructions: The case of and. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 263 ff.
Diessel, Holger & Katja Hetterle
2011. Causal clauses: a cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, ► pp. 23 ff.
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim
2007. Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology 21:3-4 ► pp. 256 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking. Discourse Studies 9:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Pander Maat, H. & T. Sanders
2006. Connectives in Text. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 33 ff.
Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2005. Sprechaktbezogene kausale Satzverknüpfung mitporqueim gesprochenen Spanisch. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 121:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Bolden, Galina
2004. The quote and beyond: defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36:6 ► pp. 1071 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto
2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:8 ► pp. 1337 ff.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization,
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012. Turn Continuation and Clause Combinations. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 273 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2002. The functional value of non-integration in clause combining: Interpersonal versus discursive independence. <i>WORD</i> 53:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005. Two types of coordination in clause combining. Lingua 115:4 ► pp. 611 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2006. The role of mood marking in complex sentences A case study of Australian languages. <i>WORD</i> 57:2-3 ► pp. 195 ff.
Caspers, Johanneke
1998. Who's Next? The Melodic Marking of Question vs. Continuation in Dutch. Language and Speech 41:3-4 ► pp. 375 ff.
Caspers, Johanneke
2003. Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 31:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Interplay of syntax, prosody, body movements and pragmatic resources in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 195 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Glossing conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 7. Conclusion. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 241 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Preliminaries and methodology. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 23 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 247 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Prosody in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 71 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Syntax in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 33 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Body movements in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 139 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Transcription conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2015. Références bibliographiques. In La dislocation à droite revisitée [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 261 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.