Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of language
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 323356
References
Arndt, Erwin
(1956) Die begründenden Sätze im Neuhochdeutschen und ihre wichtigsten Konjunktionen. Dissertation. Humboldt Universität: Berlin.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(1984) How people use adverbial clauses. In C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 437-449.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter
(1989) Grundriß der Deutschen Grammatik. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin
(1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia
(1993) Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text 14.4: 531-554.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaumann, Ulrike
(1982) Weil die machen jetzt bald zu’. Dissertation, Universität Mainz.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia
(1976) Main clause phenomena in subordinate. Language 521: 382-397. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
(1993a) ‘… weil – man kann es ja wissenschaftlich untersuchen’ -Diskurspragmatische Aspekte der Wortstellung in WEIL-Sätzen. Linguistische Berichte 1431: 37-59.Google Scholar
(1993b) Diskursstrategien in der Interkulturellen Kommunikation. Analysen deutschchinesischer Gespräche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Exemplary stories: The cooperative construction of indignation. Versus 70/71: 147-175.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
.& Ruqaiya Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A Thompson
(1994) Introduction. Text 14.4: 461-463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi
(1993) Das epistemische WEIL. Bedeutungswandel einer Konjunktion. In HJ. Heringer & G. Stötzel (eds.), Sprachgeschichte und Sprachkritik. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, pp. 219-247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
(1985) On the history of concessive connectives in English. Qiachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua 661: 363-381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Crosslinguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In J.A Hawkins (eds.), Explaining Language Universals. New York: Basil Blackwell, pp. 145-166.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Eisenberg
(1984) Zur Pragmatik von Konzessivsätzen. In G. Stickel (ed.), Pragmatik in der Grammatik. Düsseldorf: Schwann, pp. 313-332.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
(1988) Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 101-133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küper, Christoph
(1984) Zum sprechaktbezogenen Gebrauch der Kausalverknüpfer DENN und WEIL: Grammatisch-pragmatische Interrelationen. Linguistische Berichte 921: 15-30.Google Scholar
(1991) Geht die Nebensatzstellung im Deutschen verloren? Zur pragmatischen Funktion der Wortstellung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Deutsche Sprache 191: 133-158.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
(1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 181-226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 493-535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
(1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20.3: 441-458. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
(1994) Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse. Manuscript. University of California.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder
(1983) Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 551-579. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.Google Scholar
Sandig, Barbara
(1973) Zur historischen Kontinuität normativ diskriminierender syntaktischer Muster in spontaner Sprechsprache. Deutsche Sprache 31: 37-57.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
(1995) Prosodie im Gespräch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E
(1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
(1987) ‘Concessive’ as a discourse relation in expository written English. In: B. Joseph & A.M. Zwickey (eds.), A Festschrift for Use Lehiste. Ohio State University, pp. 64-73.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
(1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott & Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 189-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Heide
(1994) weil – das hat schon seinen Grund. Zur Verbstellung in Kausalsätzen mit WEIL im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Deutsche Sprache 41: 289-305.Google Scholar
Willems, Klaus
(1994) weil es hat mit Bedeutung nicht viel zu tun… Zum Sprachwandel einer Konjunktion. Deutsche Sprache 31: 261-279.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 39 other publications

Abraham, Werner
2016. Zum grundsätzlichen Unterschied von Ereignissubjunktion (de re) und Prämissensubjunktion (de dicto) im Westgermanischen. Glottotheory 7:2 DOI logo
Bendig, Ina, Emma Betz & Thorsten Huth
2016. “weil – das ist eben doch richtig so” Teaching variant types of weil‐ and obwohl‐structures in German. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 49:2  pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Catasso, Nicholas
2021. How large is the left periphery of Present-Day German? A unifying approach to multiply-filled-prefield configurations. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 760 ff. DOI logo
Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Torben Juel Jensen
2022. When Variants Lack Semantic Equivalence: Adverbial Subclause Word Order. In Explanations in Sociosyntactic Variation,  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Daniels, Don
2014. Complex coordination in diachrony. Diachronica 31:3  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Detges, Ulrich & Thomas Weidhaas
2016. Coherence and interaction. The French causal connectors comme and car. Language Sciences 58  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Diessel, Holger & Katja Hetterle
2011. Causal clauses: a cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation,  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?. Journal of Pragmatics 60  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Eppler, Eva
2004. “…because dem Computer brauchst' es ja nicht zeigen.”*: because + German main clause word order. International Journal of Bilingualism 8:2  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline, Liesbeth Degand, Benjamin Fagard & Liesbeth Mortier
2011. Historical and comparative perspectives on subjectification: A corpus-based analysis of Dutch and French causal connectives. Linguistics 49:2 DOI logo
Glaznieks, Aivars
2022. Syntactic variation and interactional coherence in online communication: The German conjunction “weil” in written interactions. Psychology of Language and Communication 26:1  pp. 330 ff. DOI logo
Golato, Peter & Andrea Golato
2018. The real-time processing of pragmatics: An experimental psychological-conversation analytic study of obwohl clauses in spoken German. Journal of Pragmatics 132  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Günthner, Susanne
2000. Grammatik der gesprochenen Sprache – eine Herausforderung für Deutsch als Fremdsprache?. Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache 27:4  pp. 352 ff. DOI logo
Günthner, Susanne
2008. „die Sache ist…“: eine Projektor-Konstruktion im gesprochenen Deutsch. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Günthner, Susanne
2016. Concessive patterns in interaction: uses of zwar…aber (‘true…but’)-constructions in everyday spoken German. Language Sciences 58  pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
He, Qingshun
2019. Introduction. In A Corpus-Based Approach to Clause Combining in English from the Systemic Functional Perspective [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2015. Periphery of utterances and (inter)subjectification in Modern Japanese. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Huth, Thorsten & Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm
2006. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics?. Language Teaching Research 10:1  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1  pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Su Jeong & Dong-Ju Choi
2018. The Types of ‘-myeon’ Conditionals and Tense. Korean Journal of Linguistics 43:2  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Lindström, Jan
2022. Interactional linguistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 795 ff. DOI logo
Lindström, Jan K.
2006. Interactional linguistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Linguistic structures in social interaction. Interactional Linguistics 1:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Raymond, Chase Wesley
2022. Suffixation and sequentiality. Interactional Linguistics 2:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schäfer, Roland & Ulrike Sayatz
2016. Punctuation and syntactic structure inobwohlandweilclauses in nonstandard written German. Written Language & Literacy 19:2  pp. 212 ff. DOI logo
Schönenberger, Manuela
2010. The surprisingly high proportion of Verb Second in causal adverbial clauses with wil ‘because’ in child Swiss German. Lingua 120:11  pp. 2589 ff. DOI logo
Smet, Hendrik De & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17:3 DOI logo
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Stukenbrock, Anja
2014. Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics 65  pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Suzuki, Ryoko & Sandra A. Thompson
2016. Beyond dichotomies and continua?: an interactional approach to the grammar of clause combining in Japanese. Language Sciences 58  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2005. Sprechaktbezogene kausale Satzverknüpfung mitporqueim gesprochenen Spanisch. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 121:1  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
van Veen, Rosie, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted Sanders & Huub van den Bergh
Vandergriff, Ilona
2008. “weil der schmeckt so gut!” The Learner as Linguist. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 38:1  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005. Two types of coordination in clause combining. Lingua 115:4  pp. 611 ff. DOI logo
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe & Sarah D'Hertefelt
2016. Chapter 3. Running in the family. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Watzinger‐Tharp, Johanna
2006. German Weil‐Clauses: Current Research and Its Implications for the L2 Classroom. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 39:1-2  pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2005. Literaturverzeichnis. In Sprachgeschichte von unten,  pp. 481 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.