Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of language
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 427454
References
Auer, Peter
(1992) The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken German. In M. Kontra & T. Varadi (eds.), Studies in spoken languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric. Budapest: Linguistics Institute/Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp. 41-59.Google Scholar
(1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
(1986) Intonation and its parts: Melody in spoken English. Stanford: Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and pounding in discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 21-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Intonation units and prominences in English natural discourse. Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech, pp. 41-52. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Report No. 92–37. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
(1993) Prosodie and functional units of language. In J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 33-43.Google Scholar
199) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(1993) English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan
(1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
(1969) Prosodie systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, J
(1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, pp. 102-28.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cumming
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-89.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E
(1993Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Sandra A. Thompson
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A, Robert Jasperson & Makoto Hayashi
(1996) Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repair. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
(1980) Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn beginning. Sociological Inquiry 501: 272-302. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1986a) Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text 6.3: 283-316.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986b) Between and within: Alternative treatmens of continuers and assessments. Human Studies 91: 205-17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986c) Gesture as a rexource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62.1/2: 29-49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Turn construction and conversational organization. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. OKeefe & E. Wartella, (eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 2, Paradigm exemplars. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, pp. 88-102.Google Scholar
(1995) Sentence construction within interaction. In U.M. Quasthoff (ed.), Aspects of oral communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 198-219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin
(1986) Gesture and (»participation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62.1/2: 51-75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-54.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, Junko Mori & Tomoyo Takagi
(1995) Emergent nature of tums-at-talk: Preliminary observations of turn construction in Japanese conversation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1973) A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica: 91 47-96. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 31: 181-99 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 79-96.Google Scholar
(1983) Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. dUrso and P. Leonardi (eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric. Padua: Cleup, pp. 11-38.Google Scholar
(1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-369.Google Scholar
(1986) Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies 91: 153-183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
(1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20.3: 441-58. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another participant. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene & Tomoyo Takagi
In press) On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics. DOI logo
Local, John
(1992) Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer & A De Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, John & J. Kelly
(1986) Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 91: 185-204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B.B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 221-301.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Örestrom, Bengt
(1983) Turn taking in English conversation. Lund Studies in English 66. Lund: CWL Gleerup.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action, pp. 57-101.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1992a) Lectures on conversation. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1992b) Lectures on conversation. Volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: Can I ask you a question? Sociological Inquiry 501: 104-152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. (Advances in Discourse Processes XXIX.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 135-158.Google Scholar
(1989) Body torque. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meeting, November. New Orleans.Google Scholar
(1995) Reflections on Studying Intonation in Talk-in-Interaction. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Meeting, March, Long Beach.Google Scholar
(1996) Turn organization as a direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization fo repair in conversation. Language 531: 361-82. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan
(1992) Prosodie phrase as a prototype. Proceedings of the IRCS workshop on prosody in natural speech. University of Pennsylvania, August, 1992. (Institute for Cognitive Research Report), pp. 92-37.Google Scholar
To appear) Prosody, grammar, and discourse pragmatics: Organizational principles of information flow in German conversational narratives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber
(1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses Language and Speech 341: 207-234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen & Ulrike Hartge
(1992) Gestures at the transition place. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 135-157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
(1996) Prosodie, grammatical, and discourse functional units in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 121 other publications

A. Fox, Barbara
2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies 9:3  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2011. Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics 43:10  pp. 2594 ff. DOI logo
Argaman, Einav
2023. Neither speaker nor recipient: The middle-distance look of unaddressed participants. Discourse Studies 25:5  pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2022. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Uwe-A. Küttner & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. Pivots revisited: Cesuring in action. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 613 ff. DOI logo
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Richard Ogden
2021. “Chunking” spoken language: Introducing weak cesuras. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Barthel, Mathias, Antje S. Meyer & Stephen C. Levinson
2017. Next Speakers Plan Their Turn Early and Speak after Turn-Final “Go-Signals”. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim
2009. Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Belhiah, H.
2012. You Know Arnold Schwarzenegger? On Doing Questioning in Second Language Dyadic Tutorials. Applied Linguistics 33:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Bonu, Bruno
2002. Présentation. Cahiers de praxématique :39  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Bonu, Bruno
2002. L’opinion de l’autre : perturbations interactionnelles dans les échanges interculturels médiatisés. Cahiers de praxématique :38  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Bonu, Bruno
2002. Transcription et analyse : les Unités Évaluatives de Construction de Tour. Cahiers de praxématique :39  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Broth, Mathias & Lorenza Mondada
2013. Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 47:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2006. Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the ‘new’ quotatives in the U.K.1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:3  pp. 362 ff. DOI logo
Caspers, Johanneke
2003. Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 31:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Yiya & Agnes Weiyun He
2001. Dui bu dui as a pragmatic marker: evidence from chinese classrom discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 33:9  pp. 1441 ff. DOI logo
Constantin de Chanay, Hugues & Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni
2010. Les interruptions dans les débats médiatiques : une stratégie interactionnelle. Pratiques :147-148  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2002. Prosody. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf, Lorenza Mondada & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Early Responses: An Introduction. Discourse Processes 58:4  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Fernandez, Raquel, Tatjana Lucht, Kepa Rodriguez & David Schlangen
2006. 2006 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop,  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay
FISCHER, KERSTIN
2015. Conversation, Construction Grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition 7:4  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Fischer, Kerstin, Kilian Foth, Katharina Rohlfing & Britta Wrede
2011. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ford, Cecilia E.
1999. Collaborative Construction of Task Activity: Coordinating Multiple Resources in a High School Physics Lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:4  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Ford, Cecilia E.
2004. Contingency and Units in Interaction. Discourse Studies 6:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Ford, Cecilia E.
2012. Conversation Analysis and Turn Taking. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Fox, Barbara
1999. Directions in Research: Language and the Body. Research on Language & Social Interaction 32:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Girard-Groeber, Simone
2015. The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology 6 DOI logo
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2020. Un caso de variación pragmático-discursiva:queinicial en tres variedades dialectales del español. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 71:1  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2015. An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish. Text & Talk 35:4 DOI logo
Guillot, Marie-Noëlle
2022. Revisiting the methodological debate on interruptions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Guthrie, Anna M.
2022. On the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academic advising sessions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Haddington, Pentti
2009. Conversation Analysis by Ian Hutchby and Robin Wooffitt
An Introduction to Conversation Analysis by Anthony J. Liddicoat
Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:5  pp. 702 ff. DOI logo
Hayashi, Makoto
2003. Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 36:2  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Hayashi, Makoto
2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:8  pp. 1337 ff. DOI logo
HAYASHI, MAKOTO
2004. Discourse within a sentence: An exploration of postpositions in Japanese as an interactional resource. Language in Society 33:03 DOI logo
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, Tomoko Endo & Elise Kärkkäinen
2018. Units in responsive turns. Journal of Pragmatics 123  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Hellermann, John
2005. Syntactic and Prosodic Practices for Cohesion in Series of Three-Part Sequences in Classroom Talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction 38:1  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Hellermann, John & Yo-An Lee
2014. Members and their competencies: Contributions of ethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second language acquisition. System 44  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Holler, Judith, Phillip M. Alday, Caitlin Decuyper, Mareike Geiger, Kobin H. Kendrick & Antje S. Meyer
2021. Competition Reduces Response Times in Multiparty Conversation. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Holler, Judith & Kobin H. Kendrick
2015. Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology 6 DOI logo
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2015. ‘Pivotage’ in French talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 593 ff. DOI logo
Hulcelle, Marc, Giovanna Varni, Nicolas Rollet & Chloe Clavel
2023. International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction,  pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Hömke, Paul, Judith Holler & Stephen C. Levinson
2017. Eye Blinking as Addressee Feedback in Face-To-Face Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:1  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Ivarsson, Jonas & Christian Greiffenhagen
2015. The Organization of Turn-Taking in Pool Skate Sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:4  pp. 406 ff. DOI logo
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom Horie
1998. The `Northridge Earthquake' Conversations: Conversational Patterns in Japanese and Thai and their Cultural Significance. Discourse & Society 9:4  pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Jacoby, Sally
1999. Turn. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9:1-2  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Jacquin, Jérôme
2011. Orientation interactionnelle et multimodale vers l’activité de « débattre ». Analyse d’un extrait de débat public. Mots :96  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Kamunen, Antti
Karlsson, Susanna
2020. The Meanings of List Constructions: Explicating Interactional Polysemy. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Keevallik, Leelo
2014. Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics 65  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2012. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2020. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kikuchi, Kouhei
2008. Turn-taking Mechanism in Japanese Sign Language Conversation. Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies 17:0  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Kyu-hyun
1999. Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation. Human Studies 22:2-4  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Kyu-hyun
2022. Sequential organization of post-predicate elements in Korean conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
Lerner, Gene H. & Tomoyo Takagi
1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoting
2016. Some interactional uses of syntactically incomplete turns in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoting
2021. Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 549 ff. DOI logo
Lilja, Niina & Arja Piirainen-Marsh
2019. How Hand Gestures Contribute to Action Ascription. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Luke, K.K. & Mei Fang
2021. Special issue on joint production of conversational turns. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Luke, Kang-kwong & Wei Zhang
2022. Retrospective turn continuations in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Markee, N.
2007. Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics 29:3  pp. 404 ff. DOI logo
Matsumoto, Kazuko
2003. Unit linking in conversational Japanese. Language Sciences 25:5  pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Mira, Caio
2016. CONVERSAÇÃO NAS AFASIAS: UMA ANÁLISE DO TÓPICO DISCURSIVO E DO TURNO CONVERSACIONAL SOB A PERSPECTIVA TEXTUAL-INTERATIVA. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 16:1  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking. Discourse Studies 9:2  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2014. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2015. Multimodal completions. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27],  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Mori, Junko
Morof, Julia
2018. Patterns of construction in spoken French. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana, Joe Blythe, Josua Dahmen, Caroline de Dear, Rod Gardner, Francesco Possemato & Lesley Stirling
2023. Towards an interactional grammar of interjections: Expressing compassion in four Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:2  pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Linguistic structures in social interaction. Interactional Linguistics 1:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Nakamura, Kanae
2018. Chapter 4. “Late projectability” of Japanese turns revisited. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285],  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2018. Genre and constructional analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3  pp. 543 ff. DOI logo
Park, Innhwa & Jacob Kline
2020. Incomplete utterances as critical assessments. Discourse Studies 22:4  pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Park, Jae-Eun
2016. Turn-taking in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 99  pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Pauletto, Franco
2020. L’analisi della conversazione per valutare l’autenticità dei materiali audio per l’insegnamento dell’italiano L2: una proposta metodologica. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 7:2  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: the on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent,  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Persson, Rasmus
2017. Fill-in-the-Blank Questions in Interaction: Incomplete Utterances as a Resource for Doing Inquiries. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:3  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Persson, Rasmus
2017. La prosodie comme ressource pour l’organisation de l’interaction : état des lieux et illustrations. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXII:2  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Piotrowski, Michał
2014. Prosody in Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 61  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole
2020. Text selection proposals in dialogic reading in primary school. Pragmatics and Society 11:4  pp. 591 ff. DOI logo
Riou, Marine
2015. A Methodology for the Identification of Topic Transitions in Interaction. Discours :16 DOI logo
Riou, Marine
2017. Transitioning to a new topic in American English conversation: A multi-level and mixed-methods account. Journal of Pragmatics 117  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Roulet, Eddy
2001. A la frontière de l'ordre de la langue et de l'ord re du discours: a clause et l'acte. In Sprachkontakt, Sprachvergleich, Sprachvariation,  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Sidnell, Jack
2007. Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:1  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Skidmore, David & Kyoko Murakami
2010. How prosody marks shifts in footing in classroom discourse. International Journal of Educational Research 49:2-3  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Song, Zixuan & Stefana Vukadinovich
2021. Collaborative construction of turn constructional units in responsive positions of question-answer sequences in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:1  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Sparrow, Karen, Christopher Lind & Willem van Steenbrugge
2020. Gesture, communication, and adult acquired hearing loss. Journal of Communication Disorders 87  pp. 106030 ff. DOI logo
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2017. “Can I say something?”. Pragmatics and Society 8:2  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Taboada, Maite
2022. Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn-taking. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Tanaka, Hiroko
2000. Turn Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 33:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Turk, Monica J.
2004. Using and in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 37:2  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
van Kruiningen, Jacqueline F.
2013. Educational design as conversation: A conversation analytical perspective on teacher dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education 29  pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Vatanen, Anna
2018. Responding in Early Overlap: Recognitional Onsets in Assertion Sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Vatanen, Anna, Tomoko Endo & Daisuke Yokomori
2021. Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Projection in Overlapping Agreements to Assertions: Stance-Taking as a Resource for Projection. Discourse Processes 58:4  pp. 308 ff. DOI logo
Vranjes, Jelena & Geert Brône
2020. Chapter 8. Eye-tracking in interpreter-mediated talk. In Linking up with Video [Benjamins Translation Library, 149],  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Vranjes, Jelena, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
Walker, Gareth
2007. On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39:12  pp. 2217 ff. DOI logo
Ward, Nigel & Wataru Tsukahara
2000. Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 32:8  pp. 1177 ff. DOI logo
Weatherall, Ann
2011. I don't knowas a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 44:4  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Young, Richard F. & Elizabeth R. Miller
2004. Learning as Changing Participation: Discourse Roles in ESL Writing Conferences. The Modern Language Journal 88:4  pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Zawiszová, Halina
2018. On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people, DOI logo
Zellers, Margaret
2017. Prosodic Variation and Segmental Reduction and Their Roles in Cuing Turn Transition in Swedish. Language and Speech 60:3  pp. 454 ff. DOI logo
이진아
2013. L2 Learner’s Identities and Gender in ESL and EFL Classroom Interaction. English21 26:2  pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis,  pp. 741 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Syntax in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Interplay of syntax, prosody, body movements and pragmatic resources in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 7. Conclusion. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Glossing conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Body movements in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Preliminaries and methodology. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Prosody in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Transcription conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.