Interpreting and diverging in clinical interviews
References (37)
Aguttes, P. & A. Salazar Orvig (1986) Analyse du discours et toxicomanie. In C. Ferbos & A. Magoudi (eds.), Approche psychanalytique des toxicomanes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 213-241.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atkinson, J.M. & J. Heritage (1984) Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Apothéloz, D. & M. Grossen (1996) Dynamique conversationnelle dans un entretien psychothérapeutique. Interaction et cognitions 1.1: 115-149.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtine, M. (Volochinov, V.N.) (1977, 1st ed., 1920) Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage. Paris: Minuit, Le Sens Commun.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bange, P. (1983) Points de vue sur l’analyse conversationnelle. DRLAV 291: 1-28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conein, B. (1987) Quelques formes de l’interprétation de la conversation dans la conversation. Lexique 51: 37-64.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Gaulmyn, M.M. (1987a) Reformulation et planification métadiscursives. In J. Cosnier & C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni (eds.), Décrire la conversation. Lyon: Presses Unversitaires de Lyon, pp. 167-198.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Gaulmyn, M.M. (1987b) Actes de reformulation et processus de reformulation. In P. Bange (ed.), L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 83-98.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ducrot, O. (1980) Analyse de textes et linguistique de l’énonciation, In O. Ducrot et al.. (1980) Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit, pp. 7-56. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eco, U. (1992) Les limites de l’interprétation. Paris: Biblio essais, Le livre de poche.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
François, F. (1995) Organising principles, discourse mouvements and atmosphere in dialogue: A clinical interview between a psychiatrist and a patient. International Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 11. 2 (31): 205-225.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
François, F. (1990) (ed.) La communication inégale. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
François, F. (1993) Pratiques de l’oral, Dialogue, jeu et variations des figures du sens. Paris: Nathan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
François, F. (unpublished manuscript) Interpréter l’interprétation: Quelques fils.
Freud, S. (1925, consulted ed. 1975) La dénégation. Paris: Coq Héron.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech acts. New york: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grossen, M. (1996) Counselling and gatekeeping: Definitions of the problem and situation in a first therapeutic interview. Text 16.2: 161-198. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grunig, B.N. & R. Grunig (1985) La fuite du sens. Paris: Hatier. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grunig, B.N. (1994) Pour une conception dynamique du contexte. La linguistique 31.2: 5-13.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gülich, E. & T. Kotschi (1987) Les actes de reformulation dans la consultation “La dame de Caluire”. In P. Bange (ed.), L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 15-81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, J. (1992) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-252.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, J. (1995) Mutual inferencing in conversation. In I. Marková, C.F. Graumann & K. Foppa (eds.), Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101-123.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1989) Le principe d’interprétation dialogique. Cahiers de Praxématique 1321: 43-59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. & D. Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marková I. & K. Foppa (1990) The dynamics of dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marková I. & K. Foppa (1991) Asymmetries in dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marková I., C.F. Graumann & K. Foppa K. (eds.) (1995) Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moeschler, J. (1989) La problématique des rPgles d’enchaînement et d’interprétation revisitée. In C. Rubattel (ed.), ModPles du discours. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 61-84.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moeschler, J. (1996) Théorie pragmatique et pragmatique conversationnelle. Paris: Armand Colin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rommetveit, R. (1990) On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 83-104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roulet, E., A. Auchlin, J. Moeschler, C. Rubattel & M. Schelling (1985) L’articulation du français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salazar Orvig, A. (1986) Analyse des stratégies langagiPres de patients psychotiques dans le dialogue et le monologue, Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris V.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salazar Orvig, A. (1995) Misunderstandings and the construction of dialogue in a clinical interview. International Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 11.2[31]: 227-247.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salazar Orvig, A. (in press) Espace discursif et interprétations dans le dialogue. Remarques B partir de l’analyse d’entretiens cliniques, In S. Cmejrkova et al.. Dialoganalyse VI. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
Salazar Orvig, A. (1997) Interprétations et temporalité de l’espace discursif. Paper presented at The XVIth International Conference of Linguistics. Paris, July 1997.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salazar Orvig, A. & C. Hudelot (1989) Enchaînements, continuités et déplacements dialogiques chez le jeune enfant. Verbum 12.1: 99-115.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trognon A. (1993) La négociation du sens dans l’interaction, In J.F. Halté (ed.), Inter-actions. Metz: Université de Metz, pp. 91-120.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Carcassonne, Marie
2023.
Récits, dialogues et dialogisme à l’École.
Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation 24:3
► pp. 10 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Grossen, Michèle & Anne Salazar Orvig
2011.
Third parties' voices in a therapeutic interview.
Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 31:1
► pp. 53 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Michèle Grossen
2008.
Le dialogisme dans l'entretien clinique.
Langage et société n° 123:1
► pp. 37 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.