Article published In:
Ideologies of politeness
Edited by Manfred Kienpointner
[Pragmatics 9:1] 1999
► pp. 119153
References
Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Harnish, R. M.
(1980) Overcoming the inadequacies in the ‘message model’ of linguistic communication. Communication & Cognition 131: 317–336.Google Scholar
Allen, Greg, Buxton, Richard B., Wong, Eric C., Courchesne, Eric
(1997) Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science 2751: 1940–1943. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis
(1971) Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, John R.
(1985) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 2nd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.
(1957) Intention. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arndt, Horst, Janney, Richard W.
(1987) Intergrammar: Toward a integrative model of verbal, prosodic, and kinesic choices in speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B.
(1991) Studies in the way of words: Grice’s new directions in conceptualizing meaning in conversational interaction. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
(1993) Culture specific assumptions and the concept of face: A proposal toward a cultural universal for studying face management in using language. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Pragmatics Association, Kobe, Japan.
(1997) Re-analyzing Grice’s maxims and cooperative principle from a conversational perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
(1998) An outline of Face Constituting Theory: An alternative to politeness theory grounded in an alternative ideology of communication. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Pragmatics Association, Reims, France.
Bavelas, Janet Beavin
(1991) Some problems with linking goals to discourse. In K. Tracy (ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 119–130.Google Scholar
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., Radley, A.
(1988) Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack
(1986) Discourse and behavior. New York: Plenum. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope
(1995) Politeness strategies and the attribution of intention: The case of Tzeltal irony. In E. N. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 153–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, Levinson, Stephen C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Page numbers in the 1987 edition can be obtained by subtracting five from page numbers 60–289 of the 1978 edition.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cartier, Francis A.
(1963) Three misconceptions of communication. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 201: 135–145.Google Scholar
Chen, Victoria
(1990/1991) Mien tze at the Chinese dinner table: A study of the interactional accomplishment of face. Research on Language and Social Interaction 241: 109–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., Clark, Eve V.
(1977) Psychology & language. New York: Harcourt Brace Javonovich.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., Thompson, Sandra A.
Fraser, Bruce
(1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics: 141, 219–236. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Good, David A.
(1989) The viability of conversational grammars. In M. M. Taylor, F. Neel & D. G. Bouwhuis (eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 135–144.Google Scholar
(1990) Repair and cooperation in conversation. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert, & D. Frolich (eds.), Computers and communication. London: Academic Press, 133–149.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
Grice, H. Paul
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy
(1996) The language connection: Philosophy and linguistics. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodolgy. Cambridge: UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
(1989) Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistics politeness. Multilingua 81: 233–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Sally, Ochs, Elinor
(1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 281: 171–183. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jary, Mark
(1998) Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 301: 1–19. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, D. Lawrence
(1987) The convergence theory of communication, self organization, and cultural evolution. In D. L. Kincaid (ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and western perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 209–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus
(1970) On generating data in communication research. Journal of Communication 201: 241–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1975) Some principles of information storage and retrieval in society. General Systems 201: 15–35.Google Scholar
(1984) An epistemological foundation for communication. Journal of Communication 34(3): 21–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) On the ethics of constructing communication. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, & E. Wartella (eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 1, Paradigm issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 66–96.Google Scholar
(1993) Major metaphors of communication and some constructivist reflections on their use. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21: 3–25.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
(1994) A recursive theory of communication. In D. Crowley & D. Mitchell (eds.), Communication theory today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 78–104.Google Scholar
(1997) Review of J.R. Searle, The construction of social reality. Communication Theory 71: 81–84.Google Scholar
Lannamann, John W.
(1994) The problem with disempowering ideology. In S. A. Deetz (eds.), o mmunication yearbook 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 136–147.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
(1996) Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 591: 303–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 221–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logo
Linell, Per
(1982) The written language bias in linguistics. Linkoping, Sweden: Dept. of Communication Studies, University of Linkoping.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Ulric
(1976) Cognition and reality: Principles and limitations of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
(1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. search on Language and Social Interaction 261: 287–306. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pearce, W. Barnett, Cronen, Vernon E.
(1980) Communication, action and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael J.
(1979) The conduit metaphor-A case study in frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 284–324.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lectures on conversation: Volume II. Edited by Gail Jefferson, with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A, Jefferson, Gail
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of the turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696–735. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
(1981) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 71–93.Google Scholar
(1984a) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. Max Atkinson & John C. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 266–298.Google Scholar
(1984b) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. Max Atkinson & John C. Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 28–52.Google Scholar
(1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 501: 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988a) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 135–158.Google Scholar
(1988b) Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 121: 55–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 971: 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi-Xu
(1994) Ideology: Strategies of reason and function of control in accounts of the non-western other. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 645–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stewart, John R.
(1995) Language as articulate contact: Toward a post-semiotic philosophy of communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy A.
(1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N.
(1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko., Ehlich, Konrad
(eds.) (1992) Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory, and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Beavin, Janet H., Jackson, Don
(1967) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Werner, Carol M., Baxter, Leslie A.
(1994) Temporal qualities of relationships: Organismic, transactional, and dialectical views. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 323–379.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas P., Wiemann, John M., Zimmerman, Don H.
(1984) Models of turn taking in conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31: 159–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 114 other publications

Archer, Dawn
2017. (Im)politeness in Legal Settings. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B
2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2:2 DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5:2 DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2010. Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42:8  pp. 2078 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2013. Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics 58  pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2013. Conceptualizing ‘interaction’ in interpersonal pragmatics: Implications for understanding and research. Journal of Pragmatics 58  pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2013. Face, relating, and dialectics: A response to Spencer-Oatey. Journal of Pragmatics 58  pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Bannink, Anne & Jet Van Dam
2013. The first lecture: Playing upon identities and modeling academic roles. Linguistics and Education 24:4  pp. 556 ff. DOI logo
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
2003. Face and politeness: new (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35:10-11  pp. 1453 ff. DOI logo
Bell, Nancy D.
2018. Pragmatics, humor studies, and the study of interaction. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294],  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Blitvich, Pilar Garces-Conejos
2006. Interlanguage pragmatics: A response to Andrew Cohen's “Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts” published in Vol. 2, No. 3, of Intercultural Pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics 3:2 DOI logo
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010. Introduction: The status-quo and quo vadis of impoliteness research. Intercultural Pragmatics 7:4 DOI logo
Bolonyai, Agnes
2013. FrancescaBargiela‐Chiappini and MichaelHaugh (eds.). Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox. 2009. 331 pp. Hb (9781845‐532918) $80.00.. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17:3  pp. 402 ff. DOI logo
Boxer, Diana & Florencia Cortés-Conde
2021. Social Groups and Relational Networks. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Brown, P.
2001. Politeness and Language. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences,  pp. 11620 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Penelope
2015. Politeness and Language. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences,  pp. 326 ff. DOI logo
Bubel, Claudia M.
2008. Film audiences as overhearers. Journal of Pragmatics 40:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
CARBÓ, TERESA
2001. Regarding Reading: on a Methodological Approach. Discourse & Society 12:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Chang, Wei-Lin Melody & Michael Haugh
2011. Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 43:12  pp. 2948 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Jing & Rui Zhao
2019. Book review: Xinren Chen (ed.),Politeness Phenomena across Chinese Genres. Discourse & Communication 13:2  pp. 270 ff. DOI logo
Clancy, Brian & Michael McCarthy
2014. Co-constructed turn-taking. In Corpus Pragmatics,  pp. 430 ff. DOI logo
Cooren, François
2008. Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency. Journal of Pragmatics 40:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Claire Hardaker
2017. Impoliteness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár
2017. Introduction. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Czerwionka, Lori & Sydney Dickerson
2022. Spanish and English compliment responses in discourse. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Debray, Carolin & Sophie Reissner-Roubicek
2018. Chapter 4. Closeness at a distance. In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292],  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf
2021. Social Actions. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf & Michael Haugh
2022. Action Ascription in Social Interaction. In Action Ascription in Interaction,  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Don, Zuraidah Mohd & Ahmad Izadi
2013. Interactionally achieving face in criticism–criticism response exchanges. Language & Communication 33:3  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2010. On "Revolutionary Road": A Proposal for Extending the Gricean Model of Communication to Cover Multiple Hearers. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6:2 DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. With or without intentions: Accountability and (un)intentional humour in film talk. Journal of Pragmatics 95  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Elder, Chi-Hé
2021. Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Elder, Chi-Hé & Michael Haugh
2018. The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal account of conversational inference. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:5  pp. 593 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía
2022. Politeness in hotel service encounter interactions in Spain. Pragmatics and Society 13:2  pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía, María de la O Hernández-López & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014. Spanish Travelers' Expectations of Service Encounters in Domestic and International Settings. Tourism Culture & Communication 14:2  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Forget, Danielle
2001. Figures, politesse et organisation textuelle. Journal of Pragmatics 33:7  pp. 1157 ff. DOI logo
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César & Gerrard Mugford
2017. (Im)politeness: Learning and Teaching. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus & Patricia Bou-Franch
2010. A genre approach to impoliteness1 in a Spanish television talk show: Evidence from corpus-based analysis, questionnaires and focus groups. Intercultural Pragmatics 7:4 DOI logo
Grainger, Karen
2011. Chapter 6 ‘First order’ and ‘second order’ politeness: Institutional and intercultural contexts. In Discursive Approaches to Politeness,  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Grainger, Karen
2013. Of babies and bath water: Is there any place for Austin and Grice in interpersonal pragmatics?. Journal of Pragmatics 58  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Granato, Luisa & Anamaria Harvey
2004. Topic Progression in Science Interviews. In Dialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and Misunderstanding in Dialogue,  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
HARRIS, SANDRA
2003. Politeness and power: Making and responding to requests in institutional settings. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 23:1 DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2007. Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics 39:4  pp. 657 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2007. The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39:1  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2007. The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 3:2 DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2008. Intention and diverging interpretings of implicature in the “uncovered meat” sermon. Intercultural Pragmatics 5:2 DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2008. The discursive negotiation of international student identities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29:2  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2009. Intention(ality) and the Conceptualization of Communication in Pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2010. Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics 42:8  pp. 2106 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2011. Chapter 9. Practices and defaults in interpreting disjunction. In Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing,  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2013. Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics 58  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2017. Prompting offers of assistance in interaction. Pragmatics and Society 8:2  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2022. Utterance-final conjunctive particles and implicature in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2022. Action Ascription, Accountability and Inference. In Action Ascription in Interaction,  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael & Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini
2010. Face in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42:8  pp. 2073 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang & Dániel Z. Kádár
2022. “Doing deference”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael & Carl Hinze
2003. A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 35:10-11  pp. 1581 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár & Sara Mills
2013. Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. Journal of Pragmatics 58  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael & Anthony J. Liddicoat
2009. Examining Conceptualizations of Communication. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Held, Gudrun
2024. The Italian Bella Figura – a challenge for politeness theories. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Izadi, Ahmad
2017. Culture-generality and culture-specificity of face. Pragmatics and Society 8:2  pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Jaszczolt, K.M.
2021. Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning?. Journal of Pragmatics 171  pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Jumanto, Jumanto, Rahmanti Asmarani, Ismarita Ramayanti , Siti Yulidhar Harunasari , Bayu Aryanto & Rahmawati Zulfiningrum
2024. A Pragmatic Social Verbal Project: Character Language for the National Harmony. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18:8  pp. e05667 ff. DOI logo
Kaneyasu, Michiko & Shoichi Iwasaki
2017. Indexing ‘entrustment’: An analysis of the Japanese formulaic construction [N da yo N]. Discourse Studies 19:4  pp. 402 ff. DOI logo
Kasper, Gabriele
2006. When once is not enough: Politeness of multiple requests in oral proficiency interviews. mult 25:3  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Kasper, Gabriele
2006. Introduction. mult 25:3  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Kasper, Gabriele & Steven J. Ross
2013. Assessing second language pragmatics: An overview and introductions. In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kecskes, Istvan
2019. English as a Lingua Franca, DOI logo
Kecskes, Istvan
2021. Sociocognitive Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 592 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2003. Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries. The Case of Greek and Turkish. Journal of Pragmatics 35:5  pp. 803 ff. DOI logo
Koike, Dale & Lori Czerwionka
2016. Diálogo. In Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica,  pp. 1-405 ff. DOI logo
Koike, Dale April & Lynn Pearson
2005. The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System 33:3  pp. 481 ff. DOI logo
Krishna, Arunima & Soojin Kim
2020. Understanding President Trump supporters’ behaviors about a political controversy. Journal of Communication Management 24:2  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Labben, Afef
2018. Face and identity in interaction: A focus on Tunisian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 128  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Landone, Elena
2022. Where is Politeness?. In Methodology in Politeness Research [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Leather, Jonathan & Jet Van Dam
2002. Towards an Ecology of Language Acquisition. In Ecology of Language Acquisition [Educational Linguistics, 1],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
López, María de la O Hernández & Lucía Fernández Amaya
2019. What makes (im)politeness for travellers?Spanish tourists’ perceptions at national and international hotels. Journal of Politeness Research 15:2  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Mason, Marianne
2013. Can I get a lawyer? A suspect’s use of indirect requests in a custodial setting. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 20:2  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Mason, Marianne
2016. The ‘preparatory’ and ‘argumentation’ stages of police interrogation: A linguistic analysis of a criminal investigation. Language & Communication 48  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Mason, Marianne
2018. Negotiated exchanges in the Spanish–English bilingual courtroom. Perspectives 26:5  pp. 663 ff. DOI logo
Mason, Marianne
2022. Examining the rhetorical structure and discursive features of letters of leniency as a genre. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
McCarthy, Michael
2015. “’Tis mad, yeah”. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],  pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Morton, Eugene S. & Richard G. Coss
2013. Mitogenetic rays and the information metaphor: transmitted information has had its day. In Animal Communication Theory,  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Nicholas, Allan
2020. Dynamic assessment and requesting: Assessing the development of Japanese EFL learners’ oral requesting performance interactively. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:5  pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Nicolle, Steve
2022. Communicated and non-communicated acts in relevance theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Odebunmi, Akin
2016. Book review: Istvan Kecskes, Intercultural Pragmatics. Discourse Studies 18:4  pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Ohashi, Jun & Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2017. (Im)politeness and Relationality. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Perez, James
2022. I’m not going to have a conversation with you: Linguistic refusals of 1stAmendment YouTube auditors during police interactions. Communication and Democracy 56:2  pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Piatti, Guillermina
2015. Pragmatic criteria in the syntactic organization of oral discourse. Romanica Olomucensia 27:2  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Reiter, Rosina Márquez
2021. How can ethnography contribute to understanding (im)politeness?. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Ruhi, Şükriye
2007. Higher-order Intentions and Self-Politeness in Evaluations of (Im)politeness: The Relevance of Compliment Responses. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27:2  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Ruhi, Şükriye
2008. Intentionality, communicative intentions and the implication of politeness. Intercultural Pragmatics 5:3  pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2022. Face as an interactional construct in the context of connectedness and separateness. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 547 ff. DOI logo
Shum, Winnie & Cynthia Lee
2013. (Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong Internet discussion forums. Journal of Pragmatics 50:1  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria
2011. On the Concept of Face and Politeness. In Politeness Across Cultures,  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria & Angeliki Tzanne
2010. Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics 7:4 DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria & Angeliki Tzanne
2021. Face, Facework and Face-Threatening Acts. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Skovholt, Karianne, Anette Grønning & Anne Kankaanranta
2014. The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19:4  pp. 780 ff. DOI logo
Tai, Hsuan-Yu
2016. A Study on Symbolic Competence and Face in ELF Email Communication. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca,  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
TANAKA, HIROAKI
2017. IS THE THEORY OF POLITENESS PRAGMALINGUISTIC OR SOCIOPRAGMATIC?: A NEW LOOK INTO THE UNIVERSALITY/CULTURE SPECIFICITY DIVIDE. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2  pp. 511 ff. DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio
2023. Resonance and recombinant creativity: Why they are important for research in Cognitive Linguistics and Pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:4  pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina
2024. Reconfiguring the strategic/non-strategic binary in im/politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Tetreault, Chantal
2015. “What do you think about having beauty marks on your—Hashek!”: Innovative and Impolite Uses of an Arabic Politeness Formula among French Teenagers. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25:3  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Tracy, Karen
2008. “Reasonable Hostility”: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 4:2 DOI logo
Watts, Richard J.
2003. Politeness, DOI logo
Yu, Changrong
2013. Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 50:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
YUNGWOOKKIM & Youjin JANG
2018. “Chemyeon,” the Korean Face: Finalizing the Scale and Validity through Self-Construal. Korea Journal 58:3  pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Wei
2021. Chen, Xinren (ed.). 2017. Politeness phenomena across Chinese genres. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing Ltd, Hardback ISBN 978-1-78179-176-9; 291 pp. Price: Hb GBP £75.. Journal of Politeness Research 17:2  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2009. 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.