Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Police interviews: Communication challenges and solutions
Edited by Luna Filipović
[Pragmatics and Society 10:1] 2019
► pp. 1–8
Introduction

Police interviews

Communication challenges and solutions

| University of East Anglia
Article outline
  • Avenues for further research in this area
  • Note
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 28 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00012.int
References (13)
References
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 2002. “The Miranda Warnings and Linguistic Coercion: The Role of Footing in the Interrogation of a Limited-English Speaking Murder Suspect”. In Language in the Legal Process, ed. by Janet Cotterill, 127–143. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Negotiation and Communicative Accommodation in Bilingual Police Interrogations: A critical Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2071: 29–58.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna. 2007. “Language as a Witness: Insights from Cognitive Linguistics”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14 (2): 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “The role of Language in Legal Contexts: A Forensic Cross-linguistic Viewpoint”. In Law and Language: Current Legal Issues (15), ed. by Michael Freeman and Fiona Smith, 328–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. “Applied Language Typology: Applying Typological Insights in Practice”. Languages in Contrast 17(2): 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “Applying Language Typology: Practical Applications of Research on Typological Contrasts between Languages”. In Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications, ed. by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 399–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, Luna, and Alberto Hijazo-Gascón. 2018. “Interpreting Meaning in Police Interviews: Applied Language Typology in a Forensic Linguistics Context”. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics VIAL 151: 67–103.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna and Suzanne Abad Vergara. 2018. “Juggling Investigation and Interpretation: The Problematic Dual Role of Police Officer-Interpreter”. Law and Language/ Linguagem e Direito 5(1): 62–79.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 91–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heydon, Georgina. 2005. The Language of Police Interviews: A Critical Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2016. Meaning in Linguistic Interaction: Semantics, Metasemantics , Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linfoot-Ham, Kerry. 2006. “Conversational Maxims in Encounters with Law Enforcement Officers”. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13(1): 23–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Christian A., Allison R. Redlich, Stephen W. Michael, Jacqueline R. Evans, Catherine Camilletti, Sujeeta Bhatt, and Sussan Brandon. 2014. “Accusatorial and Information-gathering Interrogation Methods and their Effects on True and False Confessions: A meta-analytic Review”. Journal of Experimental Criminology 101: 459–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Congram, Derek, Maria Mikellide & Matthew Vennemeyer
2022. Improving Witness Interviewing for the Investigation of Disappeared Persons Due to Armed Conflict. Forensic Sciences Research 7:3 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.