Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 10:2 (2019) ► pp.230–250

Time tells a story

Temporality as a marker of ideology in the Palestinian political discourse

| An-Najah National University
This study provides a synthesized perspective on the functions and ideological orientation of time adverbials as (re)situated in their socio-political contexts in five speeches by the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the UN. By analysing adverbials of truncated, extending, and fixed time references, the study reveals some systematic ideological formulations of conflict and resolution in the Palestinian political discourse. Adverbials of truncated and extending time are incongruous and generate a sense of interpretive dissonance. The truncated sense is embedded and more particular, thus counteracting the extending time which is established as more progressive, perseverant and consistent. This represents power asymmetries and different ideological orientations to conflict and resolution. Adverbials of fixed time, however, are transformative; they grant an end to a clash of ideologies due to the conflict between truncated and extending temporalities, and therefore resurrect a discourse that is based on equity and justice.
Keywords: temporality, adverbials, political discourse, language function, ideology, power
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Palestine between time and atemporality
    • 1.2On time
    • 1.3On deictics
    • 1.4On ideology
  • 2.Temporality expressed through adverbials in the Palestinian political discourse
    • 2.1[laħðˤah]: The truncated sense
    • 2.2[mə zælə]: The extending sense
    • 2.3[?al?æn]: The fixed sense
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Links
Published online: 5 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16005.abu
References (55)
References
Abuarrah, Sufyan. 2016. “Now’: a marker to a different mental representation and proximization of threat”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 42(2): 195–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aggestam, Karin & Annika Björkdahl. 2011. “Just peace postponed: Unending peace process and frozen conflicts”. JAD-PbP Working Paper 10. Retrieved from [URL]
Badarin, Emile. 2016. Palestinian Political Discourse: Between Exile and Occupation. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzi, Samia. 2009. Arab News and Conflict: A Multidisciplinary Discourse Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benovsky, Jiri. 2010. “The Relationist and Substantivalist Theories of Time: Foes or Friends?” European Journal of Philosophy 19(4): 491–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1982. “ The Deictic Field of Language and Deictic Words ”. In: Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, ed. by Robert Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein, 9–30. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul & Christina Schäffner. 2002. Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse. In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, eds. by Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner, 1–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniton, Barry. 2014. Space and Time. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 2014. Ideology. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2005. The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman & Ruth Wodak. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1971. “Towards a Theory of Deixis”. Working Papers on Linguistics, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The subject and power”. Critical Inquiry 8(4): 777–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2003. Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2011. “Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes”. Comparative Political Studies 44(9): 1267–1297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William. 2009. “Fieldwork on Deixis”. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 10–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2008. Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues: A Study with Special Reference for the French Phrasal Adverbs. The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Hill, Tom. 2008. “After Oslo: Truth and Reconciliation in the Palestinian Discourse”. Mediterranean Politics 13(2): 110–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirtle, Walter. 1977. “Already, Still and Yet”. Archivum Linguisticum 81: 28–45.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1970. “Aint it Hard Anymore”. In: Papers from the Sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. by M. A. Campbell et al., 318–328, Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hyatt, David. 2005. “Time for a Change: A Critical Discoursal Analysis of Synchronic Context with Diachronic Relevance”. Discourse and Society 16(4): 515–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamal, Amal. 2016. “Conflict Theory, Temporality, and Transformative Temporariness: Lessons from Israel and Palestine”. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 23(3): 365–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmerle, Heinz. 1996. “How to repeat what never has been?” In Time and Temporality in Intercultural Perspective, ed. by Douwe Tiemersma & Henk Oosterling, 1–11. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 2009. How Time is Encoded. In The Expression of Time, eds. by Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li, 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Time in Language. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Deixis. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, eds. by Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward, 97–122. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machover, Moshé. 2012. Israelis and Palestinians: Conflict and Resolution. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Mall, Ram Adhar. 1996. Time Arrow Within the Bounds of Cyclic Time. In Time and Temporality in Intercultural Perspective, eds. by. Douwe Tiemersma & Henk Oosterling, 65–75. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
McDowell, Sara, & Maire Braniff. 2014. Commemoration as Conflict: Space, Memory and Identity in Peace Processes. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Sean. 2016. “Temporality, Peace Initiatives and Palestinian-Israeli Politics”. Middle East Critique 251: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 1993. “Continuity within Three Scalar Models: The Polysemy of Adverbial still ”. Journal of Semantics 101: 193–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pappé, Ilan. 2006. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oxford: One World Publications.Google Scholar
Peteet, Julie. 2017. Space and mobility in Palestine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piwek, Paul, Robbert-Jan Beun & Anita Cremers. 2008. “Proximal’ and ‘Distal’ in Language and Cognition: Evidence from Deictic Demonstratives in Dutch”. Journal of Pragmatics 40(4): 694–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rauh, Gisa. 1983. Aspects of Deixis. In Essays on Deixis, ed. by Gisa Rauh, 9–61. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Ramzi. 2002. On Marginal People: The Case of the Palestinians in Israel. In Psychoanalysis, Identity and Ideology: Critical essays on the Israeli/Palestinian Case, eds. by John Bunzl & Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, 71–83. New York: Springer Science and Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Therborn, Göran. 1980. The Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1995a. Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis. In Language and Peace, ed. by Anita Wenden and Christina Schäffner, 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
. 1995b. “Ideological Discourse Analysis”. The New Courant 41: 135–161.Google Scholar
. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.Google Scholar
. 2011. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitrow, Gerald J. 1972. What is Time? The Classic Account of the Nature of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric. 1990. “Facing Power: Old Insights, New questions”. American Anthropology 921: 586–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Links
The speeches were retrieved from the following websites:
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ma, Qian & Qiufang Wen
2023. Can space be conceptualized in a different way in political discourse? An extended application of Discourse Space Theory. Discourse & Society 34:6 ► pp. 712 ff. DOI logo
Scholz, Norbert
2020. Bibliography of Recent Works. Journal of Palestine Studies 49:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.